All Activity
This stream auto-updates
- Past hour
-
Fri 19 Apr 71 Jeff Buckley — Hallelujah 37 La Roux — In For The Kill 37 James Morrison ft. Nelly Furtado — Broken Strings 36 Adele — Chasing Pavements 33 Rihanna — Russian Roulette 33 Kings Of Leon — Use Somebody 30 Taylor Swift — Love Story 30 Jay-Z ft. Alicia Keys — Empire State Of Mind -6 22 Britney Spears — Piece Of Me +4 20 Sam Sparro — Black & Gold 19 The Script — The Man Who Can’t Be Moved No reply so I've added @Paul Bearer's extra 1 point to the song he gave 3 points to, which was his most likely intention.
-
When was the last time I posted there? It must've been weeks ago. Ulitzer messaged me to say his source "came from a head of a newspaper who spoke directly with the King's surgeon".
-
Okay, fair play, I enjoyed reading that twattery, that was funny
-
That's it mango. You tell them. You tell those treasonous rats the truth. King Charles will heal and survive his cancer. Thf big manly monarch will live and punish those who think otherwise. I cannot live in a world where there isn't a big manly monarch watching over me. Keeping me safe. I FUCKING CANTTTTTTTTT
-
So you think the King's surgeon is the only one who knows his prognosis? You don't think members of the household or, just maybe, his son might know? You don't think walls have ears and things are overheard? Loads of places the source could have come from. And it's still just a rumour.
-
self-awareness isn't your strong suit, is it?
-
Ulitzer messaged me to say "he's fucked".
-
And Ulitzer didn't write him off. He reported what he'd heard. Doesn't mean people don't beat bad diagnoses, but just changes the odds.
-
The idea that the King's surgeon would divulge private medical information to a guy at a newspaper, fully expecting him to keep his counsel, beggars belief, surely? I've hardly done most of the posting there. You've probably got me confused with tango.
-
Not to godmod but can you take your bickering elsewhere. You've already ruined the Jimmy Carter thread which I now avoid.
-
You don't know if the source was unnamed. Ulitzer didn't say that. He isn't going to identify anyone here for obvious reasons.
-
I know. Difference is, people enjoy reading my twattery.
-
Whatever. Just don't write him off. Look at how many times we've written Carter off. It's entirely possible he gets through this and you know that.
-
Don't care, virgin.
-
You've made a name for yourself as a twat on this forum, so I'd be careful throwing stones in that glasshouse.
-
You're a Wikipedia editor, like me, and I expected more from you. I still do, even after all this, since you've done a lot of good work there.
-
Political Discussions And Ranting Thread
Toast replied to Deathray's topic in DeathList extra-curricular
I wouldn't trust her as far as I could throw her. -
You've been a member for about a year and a half, and for there or thereabouts a year and a half of that, you've been a twat.
-
This isn't Wikipedia. I don't need to present published sources. It's a fucking forum mango boy. A forum. Where people chat, discuss, gossip and speculate. What part of this are you not understanding?
-
Be interesting to see how this plays out if true. With QEII they could hide behind things being down old age etc..... With Charles not so much even if he's in his mid 70's
-
No, you can't label someone a nutjob for calling out unverifiable information based on anonymous sources that can't be independently confirmed. The idea that whoever you spoke to was able to get the King's surgeon to divulge private medical information? How on earth are you this gullible? I'm not giving a name, bad or otherwise, to anyone. I just think it's absolutely outrageous to be writing off the King's life. It's completely disgusting and I think anybody with a shred of decency would agree. I've frequented this forum for over a decade, so I think I'll be fine.
-
That's what this is all about for you, isn't it? You're a hardcore royalist and think that discussing and speculating about their health is treasonous. In other words you're a nut job and give a bad name to the majority of moderate royalists. The Royals are not above scrutiny and can be subject to speculation just as much as anyone else. If you have a problem with what we do here, then leave the forum. A few other users have suggested that you may not be mature enough to be on here. Take a hint a go elsewhere.
-
Literally the only thing making me believe that this could remotely be possible is that Ulitzer has a very good track record. Otherwise all public signs point in the complete opposite direction. Personally my sign will be if Charles travels to France for the D-Day anniversary. If he does and participates in the full program of events as scheduled, he's definitely in better shape than suggested here.
-
This reminded me of the poem "Warning" by Jenny Joseph: When I am an old woman, I shall wear purple With a red hat that doesn’t go, and doesn’t suit me. And I shall spend my pension on brandy and summer gloves And satin candles, and say we’ve no money for butter. I shall sit down on the pavement when I am tired And gobble up samples in shops and press alarm bells And run my stick along the public railings And make up for the sobriety of my youth. I shall go out in my slippers in the rain And pick the flowers in other people’s gardens And learn to spit. You can wear terrible shirts and grow more fat And eat three pounds of sausages at a go Or only bread and pickles for a week And hoard pens and pencils and beer nuts and things in boxes. But now we must have clothes that keep us dry And pay our rent and not swear in the street And set a good example for the children. We must have friends to dinner and read the papers. But maybe I ought to practise a little now? So people who know me are not too shocked and surprised When suddenly I am old, and start to wear purple.
-
It's entirely possible Charles beats the odds just like Carter did. It's absolutely possible and I don't know why you're being so cynical about his prospects based on anonymous, unnamed sources that you haven't been able to independently verify. If that source told you they were sleeping with the Princess of Wales, would you believe them as well? To believe this rubbish is so ridiculous it would be laughable if it wasn't so outrageous and borderline treasonous. Whoever gave you that misinformation is a scumbag of the highest order.
