Deathray

Turned it off after the first sentence when i realised it was that tosser.

Listen, if you were 92 and she was sucking your knob YOU wouldn't look to horrendous either!!!!! The face he's pulling isn't dissimilar to the one I'd be pulling while she was sucking my knob...

Fucking hell. Did they lose 40-0 in a match or something? Nah, but an eight goal drubbing is about par for their course. I'm still minded that Deathlisters should stay the course with the Fort, mind. This isn't a normal Rothes season. Is there a relegation/promotion system in the Highland League. If so would Rothes/Fort be in contention to go down?

Fucking hell. Did they lose 40-0 in a match or something?

Doesn't look horrendous for a 92 year old African

That's because most music after 1994 is ear-shite. Actually most music after about 1986 is fucking bollocks.Most music after 1906 is fucking bollocks. I blame the N-words. Tempus. You're heading for a warning. 'Non whites' is the correct response. I'm not politically correct. I very much hope the era of having to be careful what you say (lest you offend someone or someone takes offence on behalf of others) is coming to an end. Free speech should be an absolute, including incitement to violence. This isn't about political correctness it's about basic levels of respect to people of a different skin colour. No, it's about freedom of speech, the word N-word should not be censored, nor should; Paki, nig nog, jungle bunny, coon, kaffir, spick, chink, kike, etc... They shouldn't really be used though, given that there is far less emotive terminology for all of them. You seem to be using these terms purely to make a point about free speech without consideration for emotional and historical connections, which makes you a quite vile person. Its utterly shocking, nearly as shocking as hearing a 5yr old shout out the word 'fuck' in the middle of Tescos. Nice to see a legendary DL pro coming out of retirement, although id still have to go for Dr Z finishing it in the 3rd round. A five year old using the word fuck is not very shocking round my neck of the woods. Anybody using the n word would be met with gasps of shock. They might get away with chink and depending on the company paki or calling anyone from asia a jap. I've just how ridiculous this arbitrary societal lines are.. My betting is Dr Z has stopped posting because he remembered his Tempus Fugit password

doesn't Robin Williams and David Bowie cunt. No they don't - they would be Class 2 deaths. ok what is this class system of deaths you mysteriously come up with. With examples please My personal class system falls as such: Class 1: Monarchs, former Prime Ministers, former Presidents of the United States. Major world statesmen. Historically important figures like Mandela. (Some Living examples: Queen Elizabeth, George Bush Sr, Jimmy Carter, John Major) Class 2: Internationally famous public figures Entertainers and authors etc - plus those who are massive in UK cultural history or worldwide cultural history. (Some living examples: Prince, Paul McCartney, Ringo Starr, Mick Jagger, Kieth Richards , Vera Lynn, William Roache, Barbara Windsor, Tom Baker) Class 3: People's who are household names in the United Kingdom regardless of origin of heritage, but not necessarily internationally famous. (Some living examples: Bernard Cribbins, Norman Lamont, Alan Shearer, Kieth Gillespie, Steve McFadden, Andrew Niel) Class 4: Low-rent celebrities whose fame derives from short careers, or careers made up of bit-part work popping up here and there. (Some examples being reality show contestants, members of one hit wonder bands etc) Class 5: Dying people whose sole claim to fame to derives from the fact they have been unwell or dying. I would take extreme issue with only political figures being considered for Class 1 status, but it's your system and you've presented it well. So I applaud that which makes me twitch nonetheless. SC Historically important is a bit more lenient than just political figures, if someone like Einstein was still around they'd probably creep into that class.

That's because most music after 1994 is ear-shite. Actually most music after about 1986 is fucking bollocks.Most music after 1906 is fucking bollocks. I blame the N-words. Tempus. You're heading for a warning. 'Non whites' is the correct response. I'm not politically correct. I very much hope the era of having to be careful what you say (lest you offend someone or someone takes offence on behalf of others) is coming to an end. Free speech should be an absolute, including incitement to violence. This isn't about political correctness it's about basic levels of respect to people of a different skin colour. No, it's about freedom of speech, the word N-word should not be censored, nor should; Paki, nig nog, jungle bunny, coon, kaffir, spick, chink, kike, etc... They shouldn't really be used though, given that there is far less emotive terminology for all of them. You seem to be using these terms purely to make a point about free speech without consideration for emotional and historical connections, which makes you a quite vile person.

doesn't Robin Williams and David Bowie cunt. No they don't - they would be Class 2 deaths. ok what is this class system of deaths you mysteriously come up with. With examples please My personal class system falls as such: Class 1: Monarchs, former Prime Ministers, former Presidents of the United States. Major world statesmen. Historically important figures like Mandela. (Some Living examples: Queen Elizabeth, George Bush Sr, Jimmy Carter, John Major) Class 2: Internationally famous public figures Entertainers and authors etc - plus those who are massive in UK cultural history or worldwide cultural history. (Some living examples: Prince, Paul McCartney, Ringo Starr, Mick Jagger, Kieth Richards , Vera Lynn, William Roache, Barbara Windsor, Tom Baker) Class 3: People's who are household names in the United Kingdom regardless of origin of heritage, but not necessarily internationally famous. (Some living examples: Bernard Cribbins, Norman Lamont, Alan Shearer, Kieth Gillespie, Steve McFadden, Andrew Niel) Class 4: Low-rent celebrities whose fame derives from short careers, or careers made up of bit-part work popping up here and there. (Some examples being reality show contestants, members of one hit wonder bands etc) Class 5: Dying people whose sole claim to fame to derives from the fact they have been unwell or dying.

doesn't Robin Williams and David Bowie cunt. No they don't - they would be Class 2 deaths.

Why haven't we had a good old-fashioned Class 1 death since Mandela and Thatcher in 2013?

That's because most music after 1994 is ear-shite. Actually most music after about 1986 is fucking bollocks.Most music after 1906 is fucking bollocks. I blame the N-words. Tempus. You're heading for a warning. 'Non whites' is the correct response. I'm not politically correct. I very much hope the era of having to be careful what you say (lest you offend someone or someone takes offence on behalf of others) is coming to an end. Free speech should be an absolute, including incitement to violence. This isn't about political correctness it's about basic levels of respect to people of a different skin colour.

Absolutely there's been some discussion of this on other sites and there's a few cracks in the BBC's official stories even between the BBC News site's own articles. I reckon BBC staff we're told to comply with the party line or say goodbye to jobs, he didn't so this tiny link between him and an allegation years ago has been brought in to get rid of him. They've changed the phrasing from "fired" as it was this morning to "parted company" but the point stands... One BBC arcticle: "Relevant part "BBC staff knew of complaints against DJ Jimmy Savile, but senior management were not told because of a culture of fear that still exists, a report says." http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-35658398 'They included two BBC managers who confronted Savile over claims he took teenagers home from Top of the Pops.' http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-35656367 He's being thrown under the bus to show that they meant the threats to him and other staff, but he's rich enough and old enough and judging by some of his photos ill enough he doesn't give a fuck. Apparently he is thinking of suing.I bloody would! I'd guessing sacking someone over their actions in a supposedly independent inquiry could warrant unfair dismissal, if his sacking his directly connected to the "independent inquiry" surely the BBC would have to throw the findings out and start again?. On another note is just me or do Tony Hall and Janet Smith both look like your stereotypical nonce? That's the type of person we've all been taught to be wary of. The ones that end up being found guilty of, are the ones that no one would really suspect in a million years because of their position in the local community or even higher. Or like in the case of Saville where it's been covered up by enough people you kick yourself because all the warning signs were there, but you weren't 100% convinced. I know that which is why I used the word stereotypical. However there is a secret lizard family you could easily see them as members. Also the cynic in me would say that if you were say, organising a inquiry into something you'd been covering up for generations, you might just have people who had an interest in covering that up running the inquiry - that doesn't mean their guilty of anything. Not that a national state broadcaster would ever stoop to such a low.

Absolutely there's been some discussion of this on other sites and there's a few cracks in the BBC's official stories even between the BBC News site's own articles. I reckon BBC staff we're told to comply with the party line or say goodbye to jobs, he didn't so this tiny link between him and an allegation years ago has been brought in to get rid of him. They've changed the phrasing from "fired" as it was this morning to "parted company" but the point stands... One BBC arcticle: "Relevant part "BBC staff knew of complaints against DJ Jimmy Savile, but senior management were not told because of a culture of fear that still exists, a report says." http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-35658398 'They included two BBC managers who confronted Savile over claims he took teenagers home from Top of the Pops.' http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-35656367 He's being thrown under the bus to show that they meant the threats to him and other staff, but he's rich enough and old enough and judging by some of his photos ill enough he doesn't give a fuck. Apparently he is thinking of suing.I bloody would! I'd guessing sacking someone over their actions in a supposedly independent inquiry could warrant unfair dismissal, if his sacking his directly connected to the "independent inquiry" surely the BBC would have to throw the findings out and start again?. On another note is just me or do Tony Hall and Janet Smith both look like your stereotypical nonce?

Hope he can afford McDonalds on his dole money.

That level of sexism still existed even in to the 90s and I'm sure it still exists toda (in some places) I meant for a prime time telly show. Well, that's how it was in the 70s. You'll be surprised with how much sexual innuendo and even racist jokes you could get away thing in those days. It wasn't that long ago that a radio presenter mentioned that visibility where she was living was so poor that she suggested that black people should open their eyes and smile to avoid being run over crossing the street. Back in the 70s there would be raucous laughter from the studio audience and contestants. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1567904/Sarah-Kennedy-cant-see-black-people-in-dark.html There's seem to be a fair whack of defence for it in the Torygraph.

That level of sexism still existed even in to the 90s and I'm sure it still exists toda (in some places) I meant for a prime time telly show.

Absolutely there's been some discussion of this on other sites and there's a few cracks in the BBC's official stories even between the BBC News site's own articles. I reckon BBC staff we're told to comply with the party line or say goodbye to jobs, he didn't so this tiny link between him and an allegation years ago has been brought in to get rid of him. They've changed the phrasing from "fired" as it was this morning to "parted company" but the point stands... One BBC arcticle: "Relevant part "BBC staff knew of complaints against DJ Jimmy Savile, but senior management were not told because of a culture of fear that still exists, a report says." http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-35658398 'They included two BBC managers who confronted Savile over claims he took teenagers home from Top of the Pops.' http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-35656367 He's being thrown under the bus to show that they meant the threats to him and other staff, but he's rich enough and old enough and judging by some of his photos ill enough he doesn't give a fuck.

The sexism is in that episode is unbelievable by modern standards.

Just to close the loop on this - she's dead. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2016/02/13/grandmother-who-punished-9-year-old-with-fatal-run-dies-in-prison/ wait how did the child die the arctle confused me. The step-grandmother forced her to exercise (running) at an extreme rate that her body physically couldn't tolerate as a punishment, hitting and mentally abusing her if she didn't.

"New documentary claims Prince Philip cheated on The Queen" Nothing new there, those stories have been told over and over again. "While the production doesn’t name any women in particular" Everybody else could though. This is a bit like that infamous Charles saga where we all new what sort of "relations he'd been having". The general public can say it, the media can't. As summed up by Stephen Colbert. http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x2hyyf_prince-charles-scandal_shortfilms The claim he forced the Queen mum out by turning the heating down is of more interest to me? Although research suggests other claimants beside the Duchess of Kent to be the mystery woman.

Just to close the loop on this - she's dead. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2016/02/13/grandmother-who-punished-9-year-old-with-fatal-run-dies-in-prison/ The kind of scummy bastard who you hope hell might just exist for. Good riddance to the physcopathic cunt.

So you managed to log in using the new pw provided by the forum, but you can't change it to something else. I have no idea why that is, but often it's a matter of typing (or copy and pasting) the required bits carefully. My advice is: log out, log in again and if that succeeds, try to change your pw again. If that fails, PM me, I can help. How exactly? You shouldn't be able to interfere with passwords? We're Admins. We can interfere with anything here. On all forum software I've ever come across you are only able to use email resets to change passwords, and admins certainly would never be able to know passwords of users or change them out of that system. The security's for this are obvious and I really hope they are in place on this forum. I cannot read passwords, they're not stored in the database. I can set passwords. That should suffice in this case. That's only really any use if the person themselves can then change the pword so the admins don't know it, in SCs situation that fix requires you knowing his password along with him as he can't then change it himself. That's poor security. You've got that bit wrong. I've changed a few peoples passwords as they can't remember it possibly after being away for a while. We have no idea what the original pw is, that's for the individual to know. When we change it, and give you the new pw, it's always advisable to change it asap. That's exactly what I was saying. The only way to change it would be using the inbuilt forum system, the only reason SC is asking is because those systems aren't working for him. There's no point MH given him a new password unless he can change it himself, which at the minute he can't.

I swear you made the same statement not too long ago and you were wrong. I swear I was right. You made that prediction in late September 2015. Unless you're really into British politics, or Cajun cooking, no big death occurred soon after your prediction. I made it in January and Alan Rickman died. Along with Robert Darene and Buzzy Wilkinson who the fuck are the last two fuck off.Whats going on????You have gone from Sam Dingle to Tom Hardy in a matter of days. who the fucking hell is sam dingle Lay off the Lemonade Kid!!!! I think life gave him to many lemons.

Either you've just repaired the stairs in Bruce Forsyth's house, or Phantom's told you which new album he's obtained. Am I right? I'm not a stair fitter and I don't know Phantom that well. I feel it in my fingers, I feel in my toes. Death is all around me and so the feeling grows.