Deathray

Bloody hell that makes your racist jokes look mildly amusing!

I can cook. I just didn't have any food in. i can't cook. my mum makes my meals for me and delivers them to my house .i'm single and male by the way Anyone adult who can't cook at least 7 basic meals should be ashamed.

Read my new post in that thread.

I do, just wanted to get a dig in at Guest_Guest. (Let's be honest 90% of Guest_Guest posts are one keyboard warrior) Negotiate with a bunch of lunatics would'd murder you and all your children in and still think they'll go to heaven? Good luck. Bombing them isn't the answer though.

Unfortunately you cant skip all the ads.on YouTube you can after 5 seconds even if you can't does it really matter its still only like 40 seconds I don't want to watch an ad. I want to watch what I picked. Adblocker, you can even turn it on and off for sites you like.

No. That one wasn't. Not all guests have the same IP You mean to say there is more than one "Guest_Guest"?! God help us all!

Wasn't he just IP banned?

Adblocker.

What's going on at Gatwick, should I build a barricade and get in supplies until we're clear of the threat?

This clearly was pre-planned however I'm wondering if they held back until it would look like retaliation.

Even by this sites standards that seems a bit callous and unnecessary. The situation looks to have be one of the most serious terror attacks in years, the only positive thing to take from it is for whatever reason they didn't detonate the explosions during the exodus from the match as we'd be talking a much higher number of deaths.

Zorders, calm down - most DDP team names aren't that subtle. Also Morbidkid there's already a thread for suggesting DDP team names.

Jesus!! For a moment I thought the unthinkable or summat! Sadly not that unthinkable, giving CIN and CR are just fronts for money laundering.

The worst would be Rhythm is a Dancer.be serous about this guys, as serious as cancer They're malignant - be careful! Certain death - it'll grow on them!

DNS? Did Not Survive? Did Not Start - I think

Assuming that you're a new guest and not a previous member/regularly posting guest back under a new guide, or even a current member trolling then I wish to bring to attention a few points regarding your very brief post that may be considered a rant. Your justification behind this rant is entirely preposterous - you posit that DL is "killing all the celebrities". Lets deconstruct this a little bit. Firstly it is explicitly in the rules of most deadpools and the unwritten rules of Deathlist that we cannot, yes cannot, kill a celebrity for advantage and as such there's no point, an allegation of murder is very serious and should not be waged so easily, if the implication that we are indirectly killing the celebrities by including them on the list then you appear to have just elected the DL committee as some kind of god - whilst I'm sure they will be delighted at their new status the reality is that people on the list were going to die anyway at that time irrespective of the list's existence. The lists existence is mainly just a acknowledgement that these people are more likely to snuff it than the general population - and even then we've failed to break or even come close to 50% of them actually doing so, so if the list does somehow have this amazing power of determine someones time of death then it's failing miserably at doing so. The second main issue is that you posit we're killing all the celebrities, each day thousands and thousands more people with claims to be a celebrity are living than dying and furthermore only 50 a year appear on the list, out of tens of thousands. As for your reference to you guys, you may wish to know that women are involved in this as well and as such, whilst not technically incorrect you may have been better using an expression such as "you people" or "you lot". Finally you claim that it's not nice, well the way you describe the DL would certainly not be nice but we've cleared up that's not the case, where the actual Deathlist is not nice is a matter of opinion. Personally I can't see why it would be seen that way - it's in the main agreeing with people who have public ally stated they're ill or are so old you'd expect them to come to terms with the fact that at some point soon they'll die - there's not even a competitive element of dubious morality in the main Deathlist that you can stand claim as not being nice. Im not sure there are any words that could adequately describe the utter despair and futility of knowing that those precious few minutes ive wasted reading that fucking drivel ( and you can try and get me banned for being naaaaaastie coz I don't care) will never be given back to me. I've found a poem you might have wrote by Allan Allhberg http://acupofpoetry.tumblr.com/post/53449901905/slow-reader-by-allan-ahlberg Well I may have done but, obviously, I didn't because Allan Allhberg got in first you fuck knuckle. How do I know you are not in fact Allan Ahlbergh?

Assuming that you're a new guest and not a previous member/regularly posting guest back under a new guide, or even a current member trolling then I wish to bring to attention a few points regarding your very brief post that may be considered a rant. Your justification behind this rant is entirely preposterous - you posit that DL is "killing all the celebrities". Lets deconstruct this a little bit. Firstly it is explicitly in the rules of most deadpools and the unwritten rules of Deathlist that we cannot, yes cannot, kill a celebrity for advantage and as such there's no point, an allegation of murder is very serious and should not be waged so easily, if the implication that we are indirectly killing the celebrities by including them on the list then you appear to have just elected the DL committee as some kind of god - whilst I'm sure they will be delighted at their new status the reality is that people on the list were going to die anyway at that time irrespective of the list's existence. The lists existence is mainly just a acknowledgement that these people are more likely to snuff it than the general population - and even then we've failed to break or even come close to 50% of them actually doing so, so if the list does somehow have this amazing power of determine someones time of death then it's failing miserably at doing so. The second main issue is that you posit we're killing all the celebrities, each day thousands and thousands more people with claims to be a celebrity are living than dying and furthermore only 50 a year appear on the list, out of tens of thousands. As for your reference to you guys, you may wish to know that women are involved in this as well and as such, whilst not technically incorrect you may have been better using an expression such as "you people" or "you lot". Finally you claim that it's not nice, well the way you describe the DL would certainly not be nice but we've cleared up that's not the case, where the actual Deathlist is not nice is a matter of opinion. Personally I can't see why it would be seen that way - it's in the main agreeing with people who have public ally stated they're ill or are so old you'd expect them to come to terms with the fact that at some point soon they'll die - there's not even a competitive element of dubious morality in the main Deathlist that you can stand claim as not being nice. Im not sure there are any words that could adequately describe the utter despair and futility of knowing that those precious few minutes ive wasted reading that fucking drivel ( and you can try and get me banned for being naaaaaastie coz I don't care) will never be given back to me. I've found a poem you might have wrote by Allan Allhberg http://acupofpoetry.tumblr.com/post/53449901905/slow-reader-by-allan-ahlberg or maybe he just doesn't want you hammering points in that were made time and time again to deaf ears, that and your post is too fucking long. You really think a drive by ranters going to have been here when those points were previously hammered home?

Assuming that you're a new guest and not a previous member/regularly posting guest back under a new guide, or even a current member trolling then I wish to bring to attention a few points regarding your very brief post that may be considered a rant. Your justification behind this rant is entirely preposterous - you posit that DL is "killing all the celebrities". Lets deconstruct this a little bit. Firstly it is explicitly in the rules of most deadpools and the unwritten rules of Deathlist that we cannot, yes cannot, kill a celebrity for advantage and as such there's no point, an allegation of murder is very serious and should not be waged so easily, if the implication that we are indirectly killing the celebrities by including them on the list then you appear to have just elected the DL committee as some kind of god - whilst I'm sure they will be delighted at their new status the reality is that people on the list were going to die anyway at that time irrespective of the list's existence. The lists existence is mainly just a acknowledgement that these people are more likely to snuff it than the general population - and even then we've failed to break or even come close to 50% of them actually doing so, so if the list does somehow have this amazing power of determine someones time of death then it's failing miserably at doing so. The second main issue is that you posit we're killing all the celebrities, each day thousands and thousands more people with claims to be a celebrity are living than dying and furthermore only 50 a year appear on the list, out of tens of thousands. As for your reference to you guys, you may wish to know that women are involved in this as well and as such, whilst not technically incorrect you may have been better using an expression such as "you people" or "you lot". Finally you claim that it's not nice, well the way you describe the DL would certainly not be nice but we've cleared up that's not the case, where the actual Deathlist is not nice is a matter of opinion. Personally I can't see why it would be seen that way - it's in the main agreeing with people who have public ally stated they're ill or are so old you'd expect them to come to terms with the fact that at some point soon they'll die - there's not even a competitive element of dubious morality in the main Deathlist that you can stand claim as not being nice. Im not sure there are any words that could adequately describe the utter despair and futility of knowing that those precious few minutes ive wasted reading that fucking drivel ( and you can try and get me banned for being naaaaaastie coz I don't care) will never be given back to me. I've found a poem you might have wrote by Allan Allhberg http://acupofpoetry.tumblr.com/post/53449901905/slow-reader-by-allan-ahlberg

I assume you're talking about a thread regarding a 15th death not a 15th death in 2015 - unless there was a some forward thinking going on. If you try using grammar and reading your drafy before you post, it might make it easier to discern your meaning. Was there even a forum in 2003. Doesn't seem to be any posts from that far back. Gone for Zsa Zsa.

Assuming that you're a new guest and not a previous member/regularly posting guest back under a new guide, or even a current member trolling then I wish to bring to attention a few points regarding your very brief post that may be considered a rant. Your justification behind this rant is entirely preposterous - you posit that DL is "killing all the celebrities". Lets deconstruct this a little bit. Firstly it is explicitly in the rules of most deadpools and the unwritten rules of Deathlist that we cannot, yes cannot, kill a celebrity for advantage and as such there's no point, an allegation of murder is very serious and should not be waged so easily, if the implication that we are indirectly killing the celebrities by including them on the list then you appear to have just elected the DL committee as some kind of god - whilst I'm sure they will be delighted at their new status the reality is that people on the list were going to die anyway at that time irrespective of the list's existence. The lists existence is mainly just a acknowledgement that these people are more likely to snuff it than the general population - and even then we've failed to break or even come close to 50% of them actually doing so, so if the list does somehow have this amazing power of determine someones time of death then it's failing miserably at doing so. The second main issue is that you posit we're killing all the celebrities, each day thousands and thousands more people with claims to be a celebrity are living than dying and furthermore only 50 a year appear on the list, out of tens of thousands. As for your reference to you guys, you may wish to know that women are involved in this as well and as such, whilst not technically incorrect you may have been better using an expression such as "you people" or "you lot". Finally you claim that it's not nice, well the way you describe the DL would certainly not be nice but we've cleared up that's not the case, where the actual Deathlist is not nice is a matter of opinion. Personally I can't see why it would be seen that way - it's in the main agreeing with people who have public ally stated they're ill or are so old you'd expect them to come to terms with the fact that at some point soon they'll die - there's not even a competitive element of dubious morality in the main Deathlist that you can stand claim as not being nice.

So the first third of the year when we only got 2 hits wasn't good enough of a drought for ya? A drought is a period with no hits (2 hits in 4 months is fairly respectable). We've gone a third of the year without any hits before.

Going to stick my neck out and say we won't break the record. We haven't had a decent drought yet this year so we'll probably get that now!

Am I missing something? He's not dead yet! Close as you can feasibly get without actually being so: http://news.yahoo.com/german-ex-leader-schmidts-health-dramatically-worsens-105047650.html

You've obviously had more success than me they mormally lead to counts (1 tug 2 tug 3 tug)

Zsa Zsa should really be 50 rather than 1. Carter bumped to 1.