Jump to content

Deathray

Banned
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Content Count

    7,171

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    38

Posts posted by Deathray

  1. Posted

    1 hour ago, Grim Up North said:

     


    Actually some employees are making the difference up to 100%, some others like the one I work for 90%.

     

    However it is also an oddity if the govt system that if you worked considerable paid overtime in the last year that 80% of the average wage for the Last 12 months might be pretty close to your basic wage anyway.

     

    Shouldn't be getting anything to be fucking honest.

     

    Turning every Tom, Dick and Harry into a scrounger and bursting the nation's debt and deficit to uncontrollable levels is utter folly. It's alright for all you old farts working in offices, it's the next generation who'll have to pay it all back - like the fucking pensions - they need slashing too - too many comfortable middle class tossers being propped up by Uncle Giro at the minute. Call it government subsidy or whatever - bottom line is it's giro and no self-respecting folk would claim it.

     

    Every penny of it should be a loan, repayable with interest of 25% when Covids other. Sod propping fuckers up for nout.

  2. Posted

    11 minutes ago, Windsor said:

    Another thing I hate is how in the age if 24 hour news we know what somebody’s going to say in a speech before they say it.

     

    ive just read what the Queen will say tomorrow. In just about ever major speech any politicians give we know hours in advance “so in so to say....”.

     

    Well why bother with the speech? Just realise a fucking statement and save everyone’s time.

     

    Or better still just actually do the fucking speeches live.....

     

    9 minutes ago, Windsor said:

     Oh fuck off.

     

    This is my thread for my problems. Take yours somewhere else.

     

    Shove your problems up your fucking arse if you put your hand up hard enough you might find your tongue down there.....

  3. Posted

    This site.

     

    I've tried to keep quiet, but I just can't hold it in any longer. I have to tell everyone that Deathlist has abandoned ethics altogether. Let me preface my discussion by quickly reasserting a familiar theme of my previous letters: Deathlist is thin-skinned and quick to anger. Not only does it lash out at the smallest criticism, but it grows furious whenever someone suggests that it has brainwashed a large number of people into believing that the ego, the lower self, is something divine and worthy of embrace. Alas, we can't change people's minds overnight, and we can't instantly and totally dispel the delusions implanted by Deathlist's dictatorial lies, but we can preserve the peace. That might help a few brainwashees see that I am fed up to the back teeth with Deathlist's choleric apothegms. By somewhat the same token, although I admit it's not an exact parallel, our path is set. By this, I mean that in order to seek some structure in which the cacophony introduced by Deathlist's manuscripts might be systematized, reconciled, and made rational, we must promote productive, meaningful dialogue and mutual understanding. I consider that requirement a small price to pay because Deathlist's plan is to bad-mouth worthy causes. Deathlist's adjutants are moving at a frightening pace toward the total implementation of that agenda, which includes pooh-poohing the reams of solid evidence pointing to the existence and operation of a quisquilious coterie of radicalism.

     

    One can usually be pretty sure when Deathlist is lying. Sometimes there's a little doubt: maybe it's not a deliberate lie but merely a difference of opinion. But when Deathlist claims that students should be molded into “change agents” to promote its termagant, tyrannous agenda, there's no room for ambiguity: it's lying. We must understand that writing instructors seeking to introduce the concept of yahooism into their curricula could hardly do better than to use Deathlist's memoranda as an example. And we must formulate that understanding into as clear and cogent a message as possible.

    In the end, the most telling thing is that Deathlist consumes, infests, and destroys. It lives off the death and destruction of others. For that reason alone we need to change the direction in which our society is headed. One might argue that it would be better instead to catalogue its swindles and perversions, but bear in mind that even if one is opposed to fusty Mohockism (as I, not being one of the many hateful gadflies of this world, am) then, surely, there's a time to keep silent and a time to speak.

     

    There's a time to love and a time to hate. There's a time for war and a time for peace. And, I assert, there's a time to keep the lines of communication open. Or, to put it less poetically, Deathlist is known for venting its hatred at anyone who dares to throw off its yoke of Fabianism. That statement is not a debatable, half-twisted analysis or a cynical opinion. It is a fact. It is also a fact that our duty should be to point out the glaring contradictions between Deathlist's idealized view of authoritarianism and reality. To peddle the snake oil of unbridled vigilantism is alien to this duty. That's why I want you to know that before Deathlist initiated an aspheterism flap to help promote its maleficent, mentally deficient tracts, people everywhere were expected to nourish children with good morals and self-esteem. Nowadays, it's the rare person indeed who realizes that the poisonous wine of propagandism had been distilled long before Deathlist entered the scene. Deathlist is merely the agent decanting the poisonous fluid from its bottle into the jug that is world humanity.

     

    Deathlist's propositions mean delays in getting things processed, errors in handling requests, inefficiency, and many more years of error from keeping an old system alive. I don't think anyone questions that. But did you know that its argument is invalid? It is my creed that I shall ever be true in cleaning up the country and get it back on course again, and I will strenuously oppose any compromise thereof in any and all things. You should never forget the three most important facets of Deathlist's comments, namely their unstable origins, their internal contradictions, and their tendentious nature.

     

    If I thought that Deathlist's hot takes had even a snowball's chance in Hell of doing anything good for anyone, then I wouldn't be so critical. As they stand, however, I can conclude only that we can't stop Deathlist overnight. It takes time, patience and experience to change the stuck-up paradigm that Deathlist wants us to embrace. A paradigm is the lens by which one views the world and the people in it. If the paradigm is pathological, your life will be pathological, too. Change the paradigm, and you can not only change your life but also drag Deathlist in front of a tribunal and try it for its crimes against humanity. It may seem difficult to do that. It is. But I realize that some people may have trouble reading this letter. Granted, not everyone knows what “poluphloisboiotatotic” means, but it's nevertheless easy to understand that I was once screamed at by a complete stranger who insisted that Deathlist is the one who will lead us to our great shining future. That's one sure tip-off to the fact that you're being assaulted by one of Deathlist's confederates: the incredible amount of bombast; the heroic, utopian grandiloquence; the boastfulness; and the complete lack of reality. I find it depressing that so many dastardly, contentious noddies buy that sort of thing. Perhaps it's because they're unaware that Deathlist relies heavily on “useful idiots”, that is, people who unwittingly do Deathlist's dirty work for it. Without its swarms of useful idiots, Deathlist would not have been able to conceal the fact that it is a dangerous folly to ignore the threat to democracy posed by bestial philosophasters. For that reason, Deathlist wants to channel the pursuit of scientific knowledge into a narrow band of accepted norms that are based exclusively on its sinister, disaffected codices. What does it think it is? I mean, all of the bad things that are currently going on are a symptom of its worthless declamations. They are not a cause; they are an effect. The final point I'd like to make is that we can't turn back time. We can't undo the past. The choice we face today—and every day—is whether we should let Deathlist pollute the great canon of English literature with references to its blasphemous ventures or, instead, if we should be brave enough to put forth new exertions and proportion all associated efforts to the exigency of the times.

  4. Posted

    A number of incidents have taken place in the last several weeks that have troubled many members of our community. What follows is a series of remarks addressed to the readers of this letter and to Deathlist itself. Deathlist can go on saying that the federal government should take more and more of our hard-earned money and more and more of our hard-won rights but the rest of us have serious problems to deal with that preclude our indulging in such drossy dreams just now. The problem as I see it is not a question of who the freebooters of this society are but rather that most of you reading this letter have your hearts in the right place. Now follow your hearts with actions. Before Deathlist initiated a mammonism flap to help promote its egocentric belief systems, people everywhere were expected to name and shame its adulators for their power-drunk acts of tribalism. Nowadays, it's the rare person indeed who realizes that some organizations are responsible and others are not. Deathlist falls into the category of “not”.

     

    Deathlist snorts around like a truffle pig in search of proof that it's renowned for its racial and cultural sensitivity. I suspect that the only thing that Deathlist will find from such a search is that it motivates people to join its posse by using words like “humanity”, “compassion”, and “unity”. This is a great deception. What Deathlist really wants to do is violate all the rules of decorum. That's why I want you to know that Deathlist sees bipolar dimensions of privilege and oppression as ubiquitous in social interactions. Knowing, as they say, is half the battle. What remains is to demonstrate conclusively that Deathlist once tried to trick us into trading freedom for serfdom. If you consider this an exception to the rule then you indisputably don't understand how Deathlist operates. I hope, however, that you at least understand that it knows what it wants, and it knows how to get it. What Deathlist wants is to criticize other people's beliefs, fashion sense, and lifestyle. Making that happen involves capitalizing on our needs and vulnerabilities. While that tactic may prove successful, it is vexatious. It also overlooks the fact that Deathlist says it's going to engulf the world in a dense miasma of Jacobinism in a lustrum or two. Good old

    Deathlist. It just loves to open its mouth and let all kinds of things come out without listening to how subhuman they sound.

     

    When Deathlist's revenge fantasies are challenged, it usually responds by creating a climate in which it will be assumed that our achievements reflect not individual worth, talent, or skill, but special consideration. Well, you can't really expect it to defend its positions with facts, explanations, logical arguments, or even references to events that occurred less than two years ago, can you? If Deathlist is going to condition the public to accept violence as normal and desirable, then it should at least have the self-respect to remind itself of a few things: First, I don't enjoy its bawdy sense of humor. And second, it ignores the most basic ground rule of debate. In case you're not familiar with it, that rule is: attack the idea, not the person.

    Although there are no formal, external validating criteria for Deathlist's renitent claims, I think we can safely say that it should exercise greater judiciousness when extolling narcissism. But let's not lose sight of the larger, more important issue here: its self-satisfied scribblings. I don't wish to psychologize here, but Deathlist's priorities are inverted. The sooner it comes to grips with that reality, the better for all of us.

     

    Deathlist wants us to feel sorry for the slimy jobbernowls who interfere with the most important principles of democracy. I profess we should instead feel sorry for their victims, all of whom know full well that Deathlist's idolators have the gall to accuse me of ignoring compromise and focusing solely on Deathlist's personal agenda. Were these lily-livered drazels born without a self-awareness gene? Whatever the answer, it is apparent where Deathlist's loyalties lie. That's clear. But Deathlist's serfs are lower than the worst kinds of duplicitous loudmouths there are. They are self-righteous philosophasters. Those who support their subliminal psywar campaigns or help create the sanguinary atmosphere needed for them to convince people that their peers are already riding the Deathlist bandwagon and will think ill of them if they don't climb aboard, too, should realize that if Deathlist had its way, schools would teach students that once it has approved of something it can't possibly be overbearing. This is not education but indoctrination. It prevents students from learning about how Deathlist has a well-earned reputation for leading an unruly jihad against those who oppose it. In reaching that conclusion I have made the usual assumption that there is historical precedent for Deathlist's pleas. Specifically, for as far back as I can remember, it has been showing us a gross miscarriage of common judgment. Given how one execrable activity always leads to another, it should come as no surprise that the solecism “debate” is not a debate. It is a harangue, a politically motivated, brilliantly publicized, peccable attack on progressive ideas.

     

    Deathlist's credos always follow the same pattern. It puts the desired twist on the actual facts, ignores inconvenient facts, and invents as many new “facts” as necessary to convince us that its ventures can give us deeper insights into the nature of reality. Deathlist has inadvertently provided us with an instructive example that I find useful in illustrating certain ideas. By propitiating nerdy election-year also-rans for later eventualities, Deathlist makes it clear that it claims to have the perfect solution to all our problems. Alas, Deathlist's solution involves granting a free ride to the undeserving. What bothers me about that is that it's up to its neck in criminal activity. More than that, its claim that it has the mandate of Heaven to defame, delegitimize, and destroy its competitors is factually unsupported and politically motivated. If Deathlist had two brain cells to rub together, it'd realize that it has been trying for quite some time to convince us that it can scare us by using big words like “heterochromatization”. I suggest it take this rotting ordure and dump it where it and its fellow mendacious cheapskates congregate. At least then we could criticize its enormities publicly for their formalistic categories, their spurious claims of neutrality, and their blindness to the abuse of private power without having to worry that it will utilize questionable and illegal fund-raising techniques.

     

    Not surprisingly, I could go on for pages listing innumerable examples of Deathlist's delusional bromides and slaphappy quips. I have already written enough, surely, to convince you that Deathlist knows how to lie. It's too bad it doesn't yet understand the ramifications of lying. Deathlist's support for freedom of speech extends only to those who agree with it. That is, it believes in “free speech for me but not for thee”. I guess that's not too surprising when one considers that Deathlist has been trying to trick people into believing that achieving world peace requires establishing a world government ruled by Deathlist. Apparently, Deathlist has succeeded beyond its wildest dreams with two-faced blowhards; they're now fully convinced that the Earth is flat.

     

    What I want to know is, what in perdition does Deathlist think it's doing? That's what I want to know. I mean, if Deathlist manages to let advanced weaponry fall into the hands of loopy desperados, our nation will not endure as a civilization, as a geopolitical entity, or even as a society. Rather, it will exist only as a prison, a prison in which heinous slumlords effect complete and total control over every human being on the planet. Of course, I wonder what would happen if Deathlist really did corral its nemeses into mini-Bantustans to prevent them from placing a high value on honor and self-respect. There's a spooky thought.

     

    Deathlist is unhappy that people like me want to enlighten the mind of Man and improve him as a rational, moral, and social being. Such cavils notwithstanding, in these days of political correctness and the changing of how history is taught in schools to fulfill a particular agenda, what we're seeing is a domino effect of events that started with it stating that its conceits are good for the environment, human rights, and baby seals. That prevarication incited its deputies to conscript traditional academic disciplines into the service of sadism and its ideological variants. Bumptious champions of deceit, lies, theft, plunder, and rapine reacted, in turn, by justifying, palliating, or excusing the evils of Deathlist's heart. The next domino to fall, not surprisingly, was a widespread increase in vigilantism, and that's the event that galvanized me to tell everyone that when Deathlist was recently asked if it plans to conceal information and, occasionally, blatantly lie, it immediately changed the subject and started talking instead about how the stork is responsible for procreation. Is that the reaction of an innocent organization? It is not. That's why it's so important that we analyze Zendicism. The analysis of Zendicism informs the politics of social movements against Zendicism, which is important because if you don't think that conversations with Deathlist are no more intellectual than a game of darts at the local pub, then you've missed the whole point of this letter.

     

    No one believes that Deathlist is laser-focused on the most pressing issues facing our nation. No one. Some of us lament this. Some are angered by it. Many are resigned to it. Some try dispassionately to explain how they think it came to be. But no one disputes it. No one even disputes that Deathlist will eavesdrop on all sorts of private conversations because it possesses a hatred that defies all logic and understanding, that cannot be quantified or reasoned away, and that savagely possesses what I call nocuous hoddypeaks with unsophisticated and uncontrollable rage. As a closing statement, let me emphasize that we have no choice but to address a number of important issues. The time to act is now.

  6. Posted

    6 hours ago, ladyfiona said:

    Yeah basically I was speculating with a tin hat, was that they could have not done things naturally and used something like IVF or whatever. I have a schoolfriend whose son already has a genetic condition which both parents are carriers of, and so for their next child they went through a more scientific route so their next one won't have the same condition. My intentions were not to discuss abortion but to discuss how celebs like perfect babies basically, especially when the father is nearly 90.

      

     But that apparently went over someone's head and was not about to discuss it with them when they were aready on a rampage around the forum.

     

    Maybe you should have allowed to not thinking they were the parents then. Given if they've gone through IVF they wouldn't be the parents.

     

     

  10. Posted

    Results in full: Labour leadership contest

    Sir Keir Starmer won the contest in the first round. Here are the full results:

     

    Sir Keir Starmer – 275,780 (56.2%)

    Rebecca Long-Bailey – 135,218 (27.6%)

    Lisa Nandy – 79,597 (16.2%)

     

    To give some context

     

    Correct for first rounds

     

    61.8% - Corbyn 2016 (2 candidates)

    59.5% - Corbyn 2015 (4 candidates)

    37.8% - D Miliband 2010 (beaten in final round by E.Miliband)

    XX - Brown 2007 (Unoppposed)

    57.0% - Blair 1994 (3 candidates)

     

    Elections before 1994 were held under dubious electoral systems....

     

    Smith - 91.0% (1992)

    Kinnock 88.6% (1988)

    Kinnock 71.3% (1983)

     

    Elections before that were done on MP votes....

  14. Posted

    5 minutes ago, YoungWillz said:

    Vaughan Mason, US musician best known in the UK for producing possibly the UK's first house music hit Jack The Groove, dead: https://www.residentadvisor.net/news/72381

     

    He wrote Raze's UK #28 Break 4 Love (February 1989)

     

     

     

    Man who made druggie music dies r we latively young..... 

     

    Tbh 69 is bloody mpressive on the amount of amphetimes he must have took to make and think that shit was any good. 

    • Like 1

  16. Posted

    3 hours ago, harrymcnallysblueandwhitearmy said:

     

    It feels like we've almost reached the point of "he/she was ripped limb from limb by lions before falling into a vat of acid, but phew, at least it wasn't covid-19"

     

    Few posters on here who could do with being ripped limb from limb by lions before falling into a vat of acid tbf. 

  17. Posted

    1 hour ago, Banana said:

    Can you calm it down Deathray. 
     

    Nobody here wants to read a whole page of your bipolar ranting. 

     

    As I said to ObakeFilter you could save NHS a few hundred million, possibly billions a year if you had the ability to diagnose mental ealth issues via Internet text..... 

     

    You don't so fuck off. Thank you very much. 

  18. Posted

    46 minutes ago, Sir Creep said:

    Going to be a long ass year for you then.  Did yoo happen to see a game show host recently celebrating a year w PC4?  A game show host - not a world class athlete.  Yoo Diagnosed November.  Not a chance.  2021.  Yoo wrong to think otherwise.

    SC

     

    Oh Creep

     

    When will you give the facetious, malingering codswallop slosher act and break and show us the sensible human being we know behind your posts who can talk to people without pretending to be some sort of condescending wanker. 

  19. Posted

    4 minutes ago, Lord Fellatio Nelson said:

    Tbf, because you don't know him from Adam doesn't mean that nobody else does either.

    I didn't know who the fuck Genesis P whatsisname was but, fair play, he got an obit.

     

    And at some point we have to accept getting an obit is not a claim to fame in itself elevating someone above absolute nobody.

     

    Especially if it ends 'died of (with) coronavirus'

  24. Posted

    8 hours ago, The Old Crem said:

    Derek Draper himself is notable to an extent.

     

    No he's fucking not.

     

    Can we stick to the actually famous people please for fucks sake.

     

    What next the voice actor from Bill and Ben the flowerpot mens third cousin once removed's grandchild....

    • Haha 2

  25. Posted

    Just now, ladyfiona said:

     

    I never mentioned that?

     

    Also pretty sure it would be hard to have dinner with Stalin unless you had access to a time machine.

     

    The insinuation of your post was pretty clear, however much you want to back-pedal it.

     

    And it's fucking disgusting.

     

     

×

Important Information

Your use of this forum is subject to our Terms of Use

  I accept