-
Content Count
957 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by Harvester Of Souls
-
Steady on CarolAnn... Comments like that will land you in a Portugese court faster than you can say "I'm just nipping across town to check on the kids..."
-
Death close to home
Harvester Of Souls replied to Larry Pestilence III's topic in DeathList extra-curricular
You were thinking about DL in the gym? You sad bastard! -
Kate And Gerry
Harvester Of Souls replied to harrymcnallysblueandwhitearmy's topic in DeathList Forum
I concur with Godot, although I feel this thread should be merged with the Princess Diana one in order to appease the Daily Express. -
I voted for Spears. Her recent fall from 'Mouseketeerdom' has been quite amusing.
-
Gascoigne could be an outsider for future DL's. His loveable Geordie persona is hiding a liver the size of a golf ball... 2009/2010, perhaps?
-
Good old predictable Deathlist.
-
D List Royals turn out for Diana tribute.
-
Dead Amy Winehouse
Harvester Of Souls replied to harrymcnallysblueandwhitearmy's topic in DeathList Forum
Wise words MPFC. Hopefully we'll see a "Double Header" in the Winehouse family... -
Thank f**k. At last a voice of reason.
-
Dead Amy Winehouse
Harvester Of Souls replied to harrymcnallysblueandwhitearmy's topic in DeathList Forum
What would the odds be on a husband and wife combo suicide? -
Take Care Banshees.
-
Someone's Abusing Entropy
Harvester Of Souls replied to Entropy's topic in DeathList extra-curricular
Paragraph 2 -
Too much yappin and not enough drinkin...
- 2,945 replies
-
- fight
- fellow deathlisters
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
Is that picture from Viz? Up the arse corner?
-
Stop sugar coating it. Alot of us will win money if Castro dies this year. It's not morbid fascination it's profit.
-
Well said Arry.
-
Harvester Of Souls Revealed In Kirlian Shocker...
-
Golden age? Illusions of grandeur, more like. I'm flattered that I've been tolerated by the DL community but the shite that gets peddled here on a daily basis is reaching new lows. I can only work within the parameters set by the community so we all deserve a huge pat on the back for the quality forum that we call home.
- 2,945 replies
-
- fight
- fellow deathlisters
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
I can only concur with the above two posts from Mono and LG. The excuses you have offered simply do not wash. 'Probability' is a bullshit apologist tool to attempt to downgrade the seriousness of the offence commited. Langham downloaded child porn. He admits it. He was convicted of it. Anyone seriously researching child abuse knows full well that there are specialist places that will, legally, provide all the information you need without needing to illegally download the stuff. You can blame the right wing media all you wish, but face the fact that what has happend sickens normal people and most normal people know that for child porn to be manufactured, children have to be raped and videotaped to supply this vile market. Downloading pictures may not make someone an actual paedophile but it's hardly the victimless crime you're attempting to portray it as. I agree that we don't know the full details about Langham and his dubious research. We probably never will until he attempts to sell his story when his work dries up. Does that mean we shouldn't criticise and condemn his behaviour? What possible positive reason could he have had from illegally downloading child porn? Can we understand Langham? Can he be rehabilitated? I hope so. I'd like to think that these problems are fixable however many years of cynicism suggest other wise. If he can't be rehabilitated then Judge Harvester will don the Black Cap and Langham should dangle from the end of a rope. Cure first... if that fails then euthanise the dirty bastard. With the need to keep this in context I can only assume that apologists, for these crimes, have no real understanding of what actually happens.
-
Superb death! Excellent call BHB.
-
Now come on Windy. You know that isn't true. While I don't share the obsessiveness of some posters I do tend to read this site most days. The fact that I don't post much anymore reflects the shadow of it's former glory. This site used to be genuinely witty and funny, with some superb threads and material from many contributors. Now it isn't. We had a similar discussion, to this, in April 07 and now that it's official DL policy to condence everything into a master list I refer the Honourable Gentleman to the comments I made some time ago. I totally agree. Children were abused in the making of these pictures and if he was genuinely researching child abuse then why didn't he enlist the help of the various police investigation departments and children's charities? They openly encourage researchers and are willing to provide information to assist research without the need to commit a criminal offence. This is common knowledge. Townshend made it headline news across the world. Okay. He's not a child molester. Excellent foresight. So he admitted downloading child porn. He was convicted of downloading child porn. He shouldn't have been doing it in the first place. It doesn't matter whether cash or credit card details were exchanged or not. It doesn't matter that he's trying to say it was for research. Any normal person wouldn't download child porn or would be pretty f***ed off at someone who does. I hope you can clarify your post as the context I'm reading it in sounds like you're saying because he didn't pay, he's okay?
-
I have nothing against peas or those that are sexually involved with peas, providing that the all involved are consenting and of legal age. F**k YEAH! CUT HIS HEAD OFF! We won't know for definite until Langham is convicted or acquitted. However if he's convicted of manufacturing, downloading or possessing child porn then I can't quite understand how that isn't related to paedophilia. If kids are being abused for the sexual gratification of adults then there should be zero tolerance. "I was only looking at pictures" isn't a defence, and you will hang, once convicted by Judge Harvester, when the new world order arrives. If he's acquitted and there is absolutely no chance that he did any of the crimes he's charged with then he'll receive an official "NOT A NONCE" graphic from me. It'll also please yourself, and DDT, to know that I won't be posting in Langham's Nonce Thread again, unless he 1) admits/is convicted of interfering with children 2) is close to death because his career is now totally f*****. If he's found guilty then he should be paraded around the city, in a bright orange jump suit, wearing a sandwich board that reads "I AM A CHILD MOLESTER." He should then be put in the stocks, where an angry mob will throw stones (of varying size)at him from a pre-determined distance. What's left of his kiddy-diddling carcass will then be burnt at the stake... twice (this is because I haven't logged in for 24 hours and is to ensure that there is no confusion as to my feelings about paedophiles.) Regardless of the outcome people shouldn't read the Daily Mail as it's f****** shite.
-
Mr Langham said: "Yes, that's absolutely correct." Now taking odds on a suicide attempt...
-
Boxing Clever?
Harvester Of Souls replied to harrymcnallysblueandwhitearmy's topic in DeathList Forum
Shot boxer pronounced brain dead -
Seen Any Good Films Lately?
Harvester Of Souls replied to Cowboy Ronnie's topic in DeathList extra-curricular
I shall be looking for a copy there... Watched The Straight Story last night... another worth while view.