Cat O'Falk

He's on Facebook so he's brain dead at least. According to this article 5 years ago, he was alive http://www.independe...pe-1651179.html Norman Scott is still very much alive, living on Dartmoor, in a house said to have been originally provided by a benefactor. Andrew Newton, however, is the case's most curious character. He subsequently changed his name to Hann Redwin, and, in 1993, featured in a west London inquest into the death of his partner, Caroline Mayorcas, whom he had met at a west London health club. He had been her only companion when she fell 900ft to her death while climbing in the Alps. Redwin also fell, but survived. He was last heard of living in Chiswick, and engaged to a woman called Rosalieve Lowsley, described as a "wealthy company director". He's still alive and living in this farmhouse: http://goo.gl/maps/XbZ8L

He's on Facebook so he's brain dead at least.

I'm genuinely quite disturbed by this worrying trend. Why are people assuming that the work of disgraced artists must be suppressed or destroyed? There's plenty of classic art, literature, music, films etc whose creators were dodgy people. By the same token, if say a builder gets done for some infamous crime, they don't go out and knock down all the houses he built, do they? No. Well then. Fred West was a builder and I'm pretty sure Gloucester is still on the map. Gloucester is, but 25 Cromwell Street isn't. I think the reason that they need to destroy the work that this person has done is the feeling that if they possess or take enjoyment from the work that they're in some way supporting the crimes perpetrated by that person. I haven't destroyed any of my Rolf Harris albums, although the t-shirt I have now gets worn when I do gardening. I haven't destroyed any of my three Caravaggios either and he was a bit of a naughty boy.

I'm genuinely quite disturbed by this worrying trend. Why are people assuming that the work of disgraced artists must be suppressed or destroyed? There's plenty of classic art, literature, music, films etc whose creators were dodgy people. By the same token, if say a builder gets done for some infamous crime, they don't go out and knock down all the houses he built, do they? No. Well then. Fred West was a builder and I'm pretty sure Gloucester is still on the map.

How come I've got page 41 bookmarked and it doesn't exist? Was it all a dream? Mom, is that you mom?

Matron! The f Doctor is out of bed again!

Didn't he acquire two new diddymen after his last trial, Diddy Pay and Diddy Eck?

Have a read of the link I posted up the page a bit, and then tell me you feel sorry for the bearded Stylophone-fiddling cunt - I really didn't want to believe it was true of wholesome Rolf, but it is, so I hope he gets bummed to death by Big Ron on A Wing. Big Ron was paroled last week; he's at home on a tag now. Who the fuck is Big Ron? Phwoaaaar! Isn't that one sexy motherfucking love machine!

Have a read of the link I posted up the page a bit, and then tell me you feel sorry for the bearded Stylophone-fiddling cunt - I really didn't want to believe it was true of wholesome Rolf, but it is, so I hope he gets bummed to death by Big Ron on A Wing. Big Ron was paroled last week; he's at home on a tag now. Who the fuck is Big Ron? If he's reading this, expect a knock on your front door.

Have a read of the link I posted up the page a bit, and then tell me you feel sorry for the bearded Stylophone-fiddling cunt - I really didn't want to believe it was true of wholesome Rolf, but it is, so I hope he gets bummed to death by Big Ron on A Wing. Big Ron was paroled last week; he's at home on a tag now. In which case, I hope he gets bummed to death by Andy Coulson. I wonder if coulson will still be saying that prisons are a holiday camp when he gets out. Jeffrey Archer said it too and just like Coulson, went on to experience the conditions at first hand. There's a moral there I think.

Have a read of the link I posted up the page a bit, and then tell me you feel sorry for the bearded Stylophone-fiddling cunt - I really didn't want to believe it was true of wholesome Rolf, but it is, so I hope he gets bummed to death by Big Ron on A Wing. Big Ron was paroled last week; he's at home on a tag now.

Well, unless he has given up his Australian citizenship,I doubt very much whether the Aussies would be able to turn away their bastard son. It COULD be a case of us revoking his citizenship and deporting the c**t, however,Im pretty sure that there will a shit load of human rights laws which would prevent us from sending him back. He's still an Aussie I think so we could deport him once he's served his sentence (probably to avoid the aussies letting him off), wonder if it'd be worth the effort though. Both of his parents were born in Wales and apparently "Those born abroad to a British father before or after 1983 or born after 1982 to a British mother need not pay any nationality registration fees, undergo a good character check, or attend a civil ceremony as they are considered automatically British and can apply for a passport directly through the Identity and Passport Services (IPS)". In other words, he can't be kicked out.

Bugger, you just beat me to it.

Sky News is reporting Rolf's been gaoled for 5 years 9 months

See you next Thursday!

Fat bastard in Rochdale ... Whoever could that be? Nice one squirrel!

Bindi, have you had gender reassignment surgery and changed your first name? That's no way to talk about your mother!

Like Jack Lyons in the Guinness scandal; he avoided gaol due to ill health and went on to live for the next 20 years before croaking it aged 92. I can't remember who it was but I seem to recollect someone had Alzheimer's, avoided gaol and made a miraculous recovery a couple of years later.

Unless you've got a shitload of money, I'd be very careful If I were you. Here's what the Daily Mirror has to say about Blue Peter Presenters.

She's alive and well but not living in Japan.

All I need now is someone to reupload Jarvis Cocker's Stars In Their Eyes appearance as Rolf. If you're really really desperate, you can buy it.

I actually think the judge will be fairly lenient. Because of his age and positive attitude (compared with Max Clifford) he might even get a suspended sentence, or maybe 2 or 3 years jail time Time for definite, but Rolf might even comply with a treatment programme and I'd say 30 months tops. Treatment program's might be fair enough if this was the kind of over-familiarity we were looking at in William Roach's allegation, it's something much more sinister though. I think a treatment programme would be a complete waste of time and money; he's hardly likely to go out and do it again, if not on health grounds, then on account everyone knows what he's like and will steer clear.

Anatoly Kornukov who relayed the order to shoot down the Korean Air Lines civil airliner flight KAL007 has died aged 72.

This may not be the right place or time to discuss this but I am interested in your comment. How is Dutch justice perceived? Who decides on the guilt or ortherwise? A few years ago it was suggested by Jack Straw to limit trial by jury in certain complex cases and the reaction this provoked was as though he had suggested barbecuing kittens. I understand the arguments for being tried in front of your peers but we need to look at all options and experience of fully developed democracies that cope without the system should be allowed to inform the debate. If, for example, you put a truly heart-rending case of assisted suicide before a jury, the chances are the defendant will be acquitted, even if they said they did it when giving evidence. A bench trial would almost certainly find them guilty. Although it doesn't happen very often, a jury can ignore a judge's direction. Probably the most famous case being Bushel's Case which resulted in a commemorative plaque being placed in the Old Bailey. It says: "established the right of juries to give their verdict according to their conviction". http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bushel's_Case

My 18 year old nephew said the exact same thing whilst we were watching the news last night.