Jump to content

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, Toast said:

 

How would you know what I do and don't agree with?

Because your reasoning was because you were voting against the tories, you never mentioned that you voted Lib Dems because of their policies.

  • Facepalm 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, TQR said:


I mean, this is just class :lol:

 

Get back to parroting hysterical fascism on Facebook with your skinhead family, you might not be laughed at so much there. 

Last word!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

With BJ perhaps threatening a General Election, this doesn't actually come at a great time for Starmer.

 

He may during the period of lead up be fined for his gathering and be forced to step down by his own honour. Damaged Tory leader against no leader Labour? Hmmm.

 

Also, that's what you get when your country is run by two special interest parties.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Pal of mine swears he's an alcoholic - "he's got the face of someone who knocks back half a bottle of Scotch a day".

 

He's Scottish so I guess he's seen a few in his time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 06/06/2022 at 14:43, YoungWillz said:

He may during the period of lead up be fined for his gathering and be forced to step down by his own honour.


Nope. Cleared by Durham police.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 10/06/2022 at 22:40, Imelda said:

Pal of mine swears he's an alcoholic - "he's got the face of someone who knocks back half a bottle of Scotch a day".

 

He's Scottish so I guess he's seen a few in his time.

 

 

The evidence of this is Starmer's face, right - I mean no eye-witness accounts of Starmer reeling home with a diversion for a piss in a bush and chunder down a drain, or owt?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Brutally attacked on stage but said to be in a stable condition

 

IMG_8391.thumb.jpeg.2278323d3c562e917e6a0a698d8b1a93.jpeg

  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Glitter's bad for the planet, isn't it? Not a very eco-friendly protest.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank god someone read the memo right. 

 

"We are going to start Starmer's speech with a Glitter bomb."

 

Out walks Gary Glitter...

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, YoungWillz said:

Thank god someone read the memo right. 

 

"We are going to start Starmer's speech with a Glitter bomb."

 

Out walks Gary Glitter...

No. A bunch of Asian kids saying 'I love you long time' would be better. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites


 

Are the Telegraph trying to suggest he might be losing it?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, The Old Crem said:
Are the Telegraph trying to suggest he might be losing it?

 

Of course they are. They're desperate as fuck.

  • Facepalm 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, TQR said:

 

Of course they are. They're desperate as fuck.

There is a conspiracy theory going around saying he has a trans child as well. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, The Old Crem said:

There is a conspiracy theory going around saying he has a trans child as well. 

 

Uncle?

  • Facepalm 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
41 minutes ago, TQR said:

 

Of course they are. They're desperate as fuck.

Full blown depeseration from the Tory shitrags. Harry Cole is already on a war footing for them.  Trying to drag up 'currygate' yet again. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
41 minutes ago, TQR said:

 

Of course they are. They're desperate as fuck.

 

An interesting point - the die-hard Tory press aren't doing what they did in 1997 and giving into the inevitable. There's far too much political capital burned in favour of Brexit, Truss, Boris and sending asylum seekers to Rwanda. 

 

We could be months away from them ranting in support of an imploding opposition who snagged their lowest ever vote. 

 

Interesting times and that, eh?

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, tomarse said:

Full blown depeseration from the Tory shitrags. Harry Cole is already on a war footing for them.  Trying to drag up 'currygate' yet again. 

The Daily Mail should have been charged with wasting police time for forcing a second investigation that came to the same conclusion as the first on this matter.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not a lot of laughs as usual as he speaks in Glasgow.

 

Looks like he's woken up to idea of a ceasefire between Israel and Palestine. Took him long enough.

 

Unfortunately he's congratulated Sarwar and Baillie for their tremendous leadership in Scotland. They are possibly two of the worst performers I have ever seen, still dug in to their belief that Labour have the divine right to seats in Scotland. If anything, if the rest of the country votes Labour, Scotland needs somebody else. What he doesn't understand is that Scotland doesn't need yesmen to London run Labour. We all remember how Labour First Ministers said yes to policies designed for Middle England being imposed on Scotland.

 

Labour if it needs Scotland might get it by default. But what it needs to do imo is to have a design for Scotland different from the needs of Milton Keynes, Manchester or Swansea. And that means breaking from his idiotic clinging to a Union idea that what is best for those places is best for Scotland.

 

Welcome to Glesca, how long will he spend here in Scotland? Bet he's out of the country in hours.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 10/01/2024 at 11:02, tomarse said:

Full blown depeseration from the Tory shitrags. Harry Cole is already on a war footing for them.  Trying to drag up 'currygate' yet again. 

 

Curriegate?

 

article-2200025-14E59605000005DC-387_306

 

Pants! B)

 

 

  • Haha 1
  • Facepalm 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The bloke isn’t dying. Why is there a thread about him? 
 

It’s not like he is the Duke of Sussex who has been left at risk due to his UK security arrangements. 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Windsor said:

The bloke isn’t dying. Why is there a thread about him? 
 

It’s not like he is the Duke of Sussex who has been left at risk due to his UK security arrangements. 

There's also a thread about Liz Truss. These threads only exist to give users a much-needed tirade against the figure in question. Or maybe to speculate on how soon sepsis will set in whenever they get a paper cut. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×

Important Information

Your use of this forum is subject to our Terms of Use