The Yeti 14 Posted June 15, 2005 now, how about a sentence 'This is a sentence.' Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Paul Bearer 5,614 Posted June 15, 2005 'This is a sentence.' Yes, I know. Actually I thought someone would come up with that line after I posted it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Strikje 0 Posted June 16, 2005 He is just so guilty. And is seems that he payd the parents of the childeren. And thats why they say that he is innocent !!!! and the Jury sayd he waas innocent wonder how many he payd them Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Ben Herr Posted May 2, 2006 MJ IS INNOCENT AND FOREVER WILL BE those people are frauds and are after money look at the facts thankyou Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
maryportfuncity 9,987 Posted May 2, 2006 Look at his record sales in the last five years in comparison to the massive marketing job that's been put in to try and revive his stalled career. The public have spoken. Our 24 year old bought his records and loved his music, our 13 year old tells jokes about him. End of. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Tuber Mirum 119 Posted May 2, 2006 MJ IS INNOCENT AND FOREVER WILL BE And I am a Dutchman. (Which I'm not, incidentally. My great grandmother did pretend to be one for a while, but she was in fact a Russian.) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Canadian Paul 93 Posted May 2, 2006 Never saw this poll before... voted guilty because even if he didn't molest the children, he's most certainly guilty of inhuman stupidity. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Six 22 Posted May 3, 2006 MJ IS INNOCENT AND FOREVER WILL BE And I am a Dutchman. (Which I'm not, incidentally. My great grandmother did pretend to be one for a while, but she was in fact a Russian.) Very good Notapotato! If MJ is innocent then I'm a teetotaller. ( Which I'm not, by the way- and my great grandmother may have been but it's unlikely, knowing my family.) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Magere Hein 1,397 Posted May 4, 2006 MJ IS INNOCENT AND FOREVER WILL BEAnd I am a Dutchman. (Which I'm not, incidentally. My great grandmother did pretend to be one for a while, but she was in fact a Russian.) Very good Notapotato! If MJ is innocent then I'm a teetotaller. ( Which I'm not, by the way- and my great grandmother may have been but it's unlikely, knowing my family.) If MJ is guilty then I'm a Dutchman. (Which I actually am. Most of my great grandmothers were Dutch too. One of them was German.) regards, Hein Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DevonDeathTrip 2,288 Posted May 4, 2006 If MJ is innocent then I really do live on North Sentinel Island . Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BrunoBrimley 83 Posted May 17, 2006 MJ IS INNOCENT AND FOREVER WILL BE And I am a Dutchman. (Which I'm not, incidentally. My great grandmother did pretend to be one for a while, but she was in fact a Russian.) I wonder if we are related. My great grandpappy and his sons were Russian. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
beebee 1 Posted May 18, 2006 U.S. doesn't have a "not proven" verdict. michael jackson almost certianly molested children, i think he's guilty as hell. but if there wasn't enough evedence, he a "not guilty" verdict is perfectly correct. but he still should of been given at least 10 years for being ugly in public. and another 10 for stupid in a no stupid zone. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Windsor 2,142 Posted May 18, 2006 U.S. doesn't have a "not proven" verdict. Isn't that just a Scottish thing? Or do other countries exercise it? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Six 22 Posted May 18, 2006 U.S. doesn't have a "not proven" verdict. michael jackson almost certianly molested children, i think he's guilty as hell. but if there wasn't enough evedence, he a "not guilty" verdict is perfectly correct. but he still should of been given at least 10 years for being ugly in public. and another 10 for stupid in a no stupid zone. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Canadian Paul 93 Posted May 28, 2006 Michael Jackson appears in rare showing, for those who are interested. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Tuber Mirum 119 Posted May 30, 2006 U.S. doesn't have a "not proven" verdict. Michael Jackson almost certianly molested children, I think he's guilty as hell. but if there wasn't enough evidence, then a "not guilty" verdict is perfectly correct. But he ought still should to have been given at least 10 years for being ugly in public. and another 10 for stupid in a no stupid zone. A lot of those zones in the United States of America are there, beebee? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
millwall32 105 Posted May 30, 2006 I voted innocent. It seems to me that he has been, in the literal sense, sleeping with children. And that is not what he was accused of. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Four Horsemen 25 Posted May 30, 2006 I think he was only sleeping while waiting for the son to come up........... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Tempus Fugit 212 Posted May 30, 2006 I think he was only sleeping while waiting for the son to come up........... I think he was waiting for the son to go down. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
