lospalmas7 12 Posted June 28, 2005 It is my considered opinion that all Sith Ifricans are tossers. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Heppi Jaapie Posted June 29, 2005 It is my considered opinion that all Sith Ifricans are tossers. Opinions are like arseholes: everyone's got one, and some opinions are bigger than others. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Josco 49 Posted June 29, 2005 It is my considered opinion that all Sith Ifricans are tossers. Opinions are like arseholes: everyone's got one, and some opinions are bigger than others. But will yours be satisfied on Hampstead Heath? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Anubis the Jackal 77 Posted June 29, 2005 It is my considered opinion that all Sith Ifricans are tossers. Opinions are like arseholes: everyone's got one, and some opinions are bigger than others. But will yours be satisfied on Hampstead Heath? Ba-dum-tish! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Anubis the Jackal 77 Posted June 29, 2005 Sir, I rather fear that you are mistaking me for a Seff Effrrican. I will have my satisfaction at dawn on Hampstead Heath... It's not sir. Madame will do nicely, thank you. Live like us Die like us Earn the right to speak your mind like us. I've found that it's hard to tell the difference betwenn Sirs and Madames when it comes to Sif Ifrikaans. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Heppi Jaapie Posted June 30, 2005 I've found that it's hard to tell the difference betwenn Sirs and Madames when it comes to Sif Ifrikaans. That might be because you're used to hanging around with the gay crowd and the cross-dressers. Understandable, considering your admission earlier. Ta. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Anubis the Jackal 77 Posted July 1, 2005 I've found that it's hard to tell the difference betwenn Sirs and Madames when it comes to Sif Ifrikaans. That might be because you're used to hanging around with the gay crowd and the cross-dressers. Understandable, considering your admission earlier. Ta. Ooh, touche. Funnily enough I did spend most of this weekend with a load of cross-dressers, but that is not for a family forum. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Four Horsemen 26 Posted July 1, 2005 I thought all ancient Egyptians wore skirts so nothing to be ashamed of, Anubis! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest IYG Posted July 1, 2005 I've found that it's hard to tell the difference betwenn Sirs and Madames when it comes to Sif Ifrikaans. That might be because you're used to hanging around with the gay crowd and the cross-dressers. Understandable, considering your admission earlier. Ta. Ooh, touche. Funnily enough I did spend most of this weekend with a load of cross-dressers, but that is not for a family forum. Since when is a site discussing death on a regular basis a family forum? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Banshees Scream 110 Posted July 1, 2005 I've found that it's hard to tell the difference betwenn Sirs and Madames when it comes to Sif Ifrikaans. That might be because you're used to hanging around with the gay crowd and the cross-dressers. Understandable, considering your admission earlier. Ta. Ooh, touche. Funnily enough I did spend most of this weekend with a load of cross-dressers, but that is not for a family forum. Since when is a site discussing death on a regular basis a family forum? It sure has me puzzled? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Anubis the Jackal 77 Posted July 10, 2005 Since when is a site discussing death on a regular basis a family forum? You don't have my family. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest IYG Posted July 10, 2005 Since when is a site discussing death on a regular basis a family forum? You don't have my family. Mine is weird enough, thank you very much. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lospalmas7 12 Posted July 10, 2005 Since when is a site discussing death on a regular basis a family forum? You don't have my family. I have your family. Stay by the phone and await further instructions. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Anubis the Jackal 77 Posted July 10, 2005 I have your family. Stay by the phone and await further instructions. Ah! That's where they've gone, I'd wondered why it had gone a bit quiet. You're quite welcome to keep them LP7, but the little one can bite when riled. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest stuart robertson Posted August 5, 2005 that old bugger PW Botha, cos of him i had to spen two whole years in the SA Army and then was subjected to citizen force camps year after year, so i'll be having a few beers when he goes on to the laager in the Sky!! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Windsor 2,233 Posted September 7, 2005 I got a bit excited when I read the headline. No luck. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
millwall32 114 Posted September 7, 2005 Close but no ceegar Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Mark LV Posted September 27, 2005 Listed as a Dictator, wrong, ex RSA State President Anyone ruling a country where 3/4 th of its voting age citizens were not allowed to vote is a dictator. The blacks were not citizens and therefore not entitled to vote. So he was not a dictator, but a democratically elected President. This is the truth, whether you like it or not. I'm not saying that it was right that blacks were not citizens, but legally this was the situation. Legality and morality are two different things. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
sympathyforthedevil 11 Posted September 28, 2005 Listed as a Dictator, wrong, ex RSA State President Anyone ruling a country where 3/4 th of its voting age citizens were not allowed to vote is a dictator. The blacks were not citizens and therefore not entitled to vote. So he was not a dictator, but a democratically elected President. This is the truth, whether you like it or not. I'm not saying that it was right that blacks were not citizens, but legally this was the situation. Legality and morality are two different things. So, if someone bars all the people from voting who undoubtedly would have voted against him (i.e. the blacks), and then he wins the majority of support from those whom he has allowed to vote, (a small white minority) this makes him a fair and democratically elected leader????? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Magere Hein 1,400 Posted September 28, 2005 So, if someone bars all the people from voting who undoubtedly would have voted against him (i.e. the blacks), and then he wins the majority of support from those whom he has allowed to vote, (a small white minority) this makes him a fair and democratically elected leader????? In an old-fashioned view on democracy: yes. Less than a century ago women didn't have the vote in most western democracies. Things have changed, fortunately. regards, Hein Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Josco 49 Posted September 28, 2005 So, if someone bars all the people from voting who undoubtedly would have voted against him (i.e. the blacks), and then he wins the majority of support from those whom he has allowed to vote, (a small white minority) this makes him a fair and democratically elected leader????? In an old-fashioned view on democracy: yes. Less than a century ago women didn't have the vote in most western democracies. Things have changed, fortunately. regards, Hein There speaks a batchelor. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Bald rick 9 Posted September 28, 2005 There speaks a batchelor. And there speaks a man who is VERY confident that his other half doesn't visit the site. Don't Batchelors make cup-a-soups? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Captain of Industry 2 Posted September 28, 2005 So, if someone bars all the people from voting who undoubtedly would have voted against him (i.e. the blacks), and then he wins the majority of support from those whom he has allowed to vote, (a small white minority) this makes him a fair and democratically elected leader????? In an old-fashioned view on democracy: yes. Less than a century ago women didn't have the vote in most western democracies. Things have changed, fortunately. regards, Hein And what about those chappies who invented the thing in the first place? The Greeks I think it was. Not many of their people actually got to take part either. If they could see us now, they'd probably do a lot of laughing to scorn, followed by a lot of head shaking in despair. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Teddy 21 Posted September 28, 2005 At least we now know how to stop all those Cuban protest posts in the Castro thread. Advise Castro to have full and free elections, but nobody apart from him gets a vote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Magere Hein 1,400 Posted September 28, 2005 In an old-fashioned view on democracy: yes. Less than a century ago women didn't have the vote in most western democracies. And what about those chappies who invented the thing in the first place? The Greeks I think it was. Not many of their people actually got to take part either. Yes, 5th century BCE Athens. According to the Wikipedia article on democracy "Only a sixth or a quarter of the whole (adult male) population of Athens could vote[...]". If they could see us now, they'd probably do a lot of laughing to scorn, followed by a lot of head shaking in despair. Of course democracy and human equality are different ideas. Those Greeks were perfectly comfortable with slavery. regards, Hein Share this post Link to post Share on other sites