Sean 6,330 Posted March 30, 2016 http://www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-news/channel-5-blasted-traumatising-viewers-7638429:Watership down apparently too violent for children.It is violent yes but there is a context to it and surely all parents remember the film from when they were young so could make that call! http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/books/news/watership-down-author-richard-adams-plans-to-release-his-first-picture-book-for-five-year-olds-a6941761.html:From a few days ago.He is releasing some unpublished work and the only health problem mention is him being deaf in one ear.Looks fairly well in pictures also.Says he based a lot of the death scenes from his wartime exprience.Kind of makes sense How many of those complaints would be from parents who had no idea what their kids were watching until it had upset them? Surely if it was on Channel 5 no-one would have seen it anyway. I can't remember how old I was when the film came out, but old enough to have left home. I saw it in the cinema and was taken aback by the explicit violence. If it had been a darker style of animation, like the LOTR one, it wouldn't have been so shocking. I don't have any children, but if I had I wouldn't have let them watch that film, not as children anyway. So it's quite possible that these parents hadn't seen it themselves, if their own parents knew it was unsuitable. Hope that makes sense. I may have mentioned this before but I was once witness to a fantastic argument between a couple in a library about whether to borrow this film for their very small son. The U certificate is misleading. I agree it should be a PG due to the occasional scenes of violence which may be unsuitable for young children depending on how sensitive or squeamish they are.It depends on the child though.My friend showed his 5 year old brother the scene in Kill Bill 2 where Uma Thurman rips out Darryl Hannah`s eye and steps on it and he found it utterly hilarious ,whereas when I was the same age I cried when Bambi`s Mum got shot. That's the thing though, we don't see Bambi's mum die, we just hear the shot off-screen. Now I've nothing against gritty realism, but they chose to make WD in a fluffy Bambiesque style of animation, and the way they presented violence and death was inappropriate for that style. And it should never have got a U certificate, that was and still is shamefully misleading. Agreed.With regards to the controversy though surely it is for parents to decide whether Watership Down is appropriate.I find it difficult to believe that parents of any age are not familiar with the film and its contents. 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sean 6,330 Posted March 30, 2016 http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-35924936 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Handrejka 1,904 Posted March 30, 2016 think the reason I dislike cartoons is because I was wrongfooted by Watership Down when I was 7. I've never forgiven it for making me cry and never forgiven myself for crying. It's still only one of two films to have made me cry. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
msc 18,476 Posted March 30, 2016 I hope you didn't try to cheer yourself up by watching or reading Plague Dogs. 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Bibliogryphon 9,586 Posted March 31, 2016 Just looked at the cast list for this film. Not many left John Hurt Richard O' Callaghan Hannah Gordon Lynn Fairleigh Clifton Jones Derek Griffiths Joss Ackland Mike Batt (composed theme tune) Art Garfunkel (theme tune) Martin Rosen (dir) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Guest Posted March 31, 2016 think the reason I dislike cartoons is because I was wrongfooted by Watership Down when I was 7. I've never forgiven it for making me cry and never forgiven myself for crying. It's still only one of two films to have made me cry. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Guest Posted March 31, 2016 And the other was.....? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Youwanticewiththat 611 Posted March 31, 2016 South Pacific? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Handrejka 1,904 Posted April 1, 2016 The other one was The Pianist. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Mad Hatter 1,092 Posted April 1, 2016 The other one was The Pianist.excellent movie. My favourite scene in that movie is when just as the Nazis are going to kill him he starts playing the piano and the nazi starts crying realising what a wonderful person he is going to kill. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Guested Posted April 1, 2016 Amazed Joss Ackland is still going. He looked old in the 1970s. Surely one to consider if he survives until 2017. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Guested Posted April 1, 2016 Little known fact, Bright Eyes was number one when Margaret Thatcher was first elected Prime Minister Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Bibliogryphon 9,586 Posted April 4, 2016 Little known fact, Bright Eyes was number one when Margaret Thatcher was first elected Prime Minister That was the week my Mum died. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Toast 16,144 Posted April 4, 2016 Little known fact, Bright Eyes was number one when Margaret Thatcher was first elected Prime Minister That was the week my Mum died. Sounds like an idea for a topic. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
maryportfuncity 10,651 Posted April 4, 2016 Amazed Joss Ackland is still going. He looked old in the 1970s. Surely one to consider if he survives until 2017. Hell yeah, as obitable as Clive Dunn, easily Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Spade_Cooley 9,537 Posted April 4, 2016 You people sound like you need this website, which has become indispensable when decided what films the missus can actually watch: https://www.doesthedogdie.com/application/list 3 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Vera Johnson Posted April 22, 2016 It seems unjust that Adams is blamed for the film, over which he had little say, when the book is transcendent - and none of the rabbits in the book dies. Not even Bigwig! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Toast 16,144 Posted April 22, 2016 It seems unjust that Adams is blamed for the film, over which he had little say, when the book is transcendent - and none of the rabbits in the book dies. Not even Bigwig! Yes they do. It's years since I read it, but I can still remember the bit where Hazel dies 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Bibliogryphon 9,586 Posted April 23, 2016 It seems unjust that Adams is blamed for the film, over which he had little say, when the book is transcendent - and none of the rabbits in the book dies. Not even Bigwig! Yes they do. It's years since I read it, but I can still remember the bit where Hazel dies There is also a description about the fate of the rabbits left behind at the original warren. 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Cat O'Falk 3,290 Posted April 28, 2016 "Brutal scenes in Watership Down are to be watered down in new £20m BBC remake starring Olivia Coleman and John Boyega". http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3562782/Too-scary-today-s-children-Brutal-scenes-Watership-watered-new-20m-BBC-remake-starring-Olivia-Coleman-John-Boyega.html Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
maryportfuncity 10,651 Posted April 28, 2016 "Brutal scenes in Watership Down are to be watered down in new £20m BBC remake starring Olivia Coleman and John Boyega". http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3562782/Too-scary-today-s-children-Brutal-scenes-Watership-watered-new-20m-BBC-remake-starring-Olivia-Coleman-John-Boyega.html It'd be ironic if the new touchy feely movie got Adams so irate it did for him, eh? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Mad Hatter 1,092 Posted April 28, 2016 "Brutal scenes in Watership Down are to be watered down in new £20m BBC remake starring Olivia Coleman and John Boyega". http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3562782/Too-scary-today-s-children-Brutal-scenes-Watership-watered-new-20m-BBC-remake-starring-Olivia-Coleman-John-Boyega.html Jesus come on it's supposed to be shocking that's the point kids raised like this are the reasons sjws exist. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Phantom 2,533 Posted April 28, 2016 "Brutal scenes in Watership Down are to be watered down in new £20m BBC remake starring Olivia Coleman and John Boyega". http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3562782/Too-scary-today-s-children-Brutal-scenes-Watership-watered-new-20m-BBC-remake-starring-Olivia-Coleman-John-Boyega.html Jesus come on it's supposed to be shocking that's the point kids raised like this are the reasons sjws exist. Exactly, that's why after we watch Watership Down, I serve my kids rabbit stew. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Weebl 216 Posted April 28, 2016 Absolute load of shit. Animals kill each other in nature. Animals die. People die. Life is not some fucking fairy story where everyone lives happily ever after, and that is what they should be teaching kids, not censoring for fear of offending. But we live in the age of political correctness, where you can't say one little fucking thing for fear of being accused of racism, misogyny, homophobia, Islamophobia, anti-Semitism, transphobia ... 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Cat O'Falk 3,290 Posted April 28, 2016 Straight people are so fucking stupid! Every time I wear this T-shirt they haven't a fucking clue what it means. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites