Joey Russ 7,119 Posted August 20, 2016 Who said there will be no more deaths this year? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sir Creep 7,013 Posted August 21, 2016 As stated in The 6th Death of 2016:___________________________________ "[T]he numerals 3-4-7-8-9 are taken, thus no one with that numeral is possible.3: (Crowe) Gabor, MTM, Carter, Pirsig, Kissinger, Greaves4: (Vigoda) LzSmith, Banks 7: (Reagan) Interestingly she's the only one out of fifty names! 8: (Boutras-Ghali) de Cuellar, Norden, Ali, Gascoigne 9: (Michelmore) de Havilland, Adulyadej, KDouglas, CJames, Noakes That leaves the following, but before we get there, The Reaper has made it CLEAR he is only taking folks 94 or older (unless gravely ill -- but we haven't any imo), so I'm eliminating anyone 93 or younger. 0: Prince Philip, Lord Carrington, Stan Lee (Bush, Randi, Domino, Hawking all too young)1: Havelange, BGraham, Sallis (Gall and Dole too young) 2: None (Joost, Scales, MWalker, Forsyth all too young)5: VLynn (Chong, Phillips, Piggott all too young) 6: Wouk, RAdams, Lamotta (Ellis, Castro, Tutu, Campbell, Chirac all too young) So there you have it, the list of 10 real possibilities, the rest are lagniappe. If you've chosen someone outside of the bold names, you are bloody wrong." ___________________________________ Ali was an outlier, period. Havelange was right on target and leaves us with: 0: Prince Philip, Lord Carrington, Stan Lee 5: VLynn 6: Wouk, RAdams, LamottaThat's it! 7 names. You chose someone else, you are wrong. Sir Creep will count out Jake Lamotta on Sept 17.SC Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Joey Russ 7,119 Posted August 21, 2016 As stated in The 6th Death of 2016: ___________________________________ "[T]he numerals 3-4-7-8-9 are taken, thus no one with that numeral is possible. 3: (Crowe) Gabor, MTM, Carter, Pirsig, Kissinger, Greaves 4: (Vigoda) LzSmith, Banks 7: (Reagan) Interestingly she's the only one out of fifty names! 8: (Boutras-Ghali) de Cuellar, Norden, Ali, Gascoigne 9: (Michelmore) de Havilland, Adulyadej, KDouglas, CJames, Noakes That leaves the following, but before we get there, The Reaper has made it CLEAR he is only taking folks 94 or older (unless gravely ill -- but we haven't any imo), so I'm eliminating anyone 93 or younger. 0: Prince Philip, Lord Carrington, Stan Lee (Bush, Randi, Domino, Hawking all too young) 1: Havelange, BGraham, Sallis (Gall and Dole too young) 2: None (Joost, Scales, MWalker, Forsyth all too young) 5: VLynn (Chong, Phillips, Piggott all too young) 6: Wouk, RAdams, Lamotta (Ellis, Castro, Tutu, Campbell, Chirac all too young) So there you have it, the list of 10 real possibilities, the rest are lagniappe. If you've chosen someone outside of the bold names, you are bloody wrong." ___________________________________ Ali was an outlier, period. Havelange was right on target and leaves us with: 0: Prince Philip, Lord Carrington, Stan Lee 5: VLynn 6: Wouk, RAdams, Lamotta That's it! 7 names. You chose someone else, you are wrong. Sir Creep will count out Jake Lamotta on Sept 17. SC That's actually a pretty good analysis there. I would probably say that the king of Thailand, who's been in and out of the hospital could be a possibility. Stan Lee won't be next. I don't think he's ill in anyway shape or form. I wonder why he's even on my list. As for me, my vote still goes out to lord carrington, which strangely enough, was one of your seven. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rockhopper penguin 2,264 Posted August 21, 2016 As stated in The 6th Death of 2016: ___________________________________ "[T]he numerals 3-4-7-8-9 are taken, thus no one with that numeral is possible. 3: (Crowe) Gabor, MTM, Carter, Pirsig, Kissinger, Greaves 4: (Vigoda) LzSmith, Banks 7: (Reagan) Interestingly she's the only one out of fifty names! 8: (Boutras-Ghali) de Cuellar, Norden, Ali, Gascoigne 9: (Michelmore) de Havilland, Adulyadej, KDouglas, CJames, Noakes That leaves the following, but before we get there, The Reaper has made it CLEAR he is only taking folks 94 or older (unless gravely ill -- but we haven't any imo), so I'm eliminating anyone 93 or younger. 0: Prince Philip, Lord Carrington, Stan Lee (Bush, Randi, Domino, Hawking all too young) 1: Havelange, BGraham, Sallis (Gall and Dole too young) 2: None (Joost, Scales, MWalker, Forsyth all too young) 5: VLynn (Chong, Phillips, Piggott all too young) 6: Wouk, RAdams, Lamotta (Ellis, Castro, Tutu, Campbell, Chirac all too young) So there you have it, the list of 10 real possibilities, the rest are lagniappe. If you've chosen someone outside of the bold names, you are bloody wrong." ___________________________________ Ali was an outlier, period. Havelange was right on target and leaves us with: 0: Prince Philip, Lord Carrington, Stan Lee 5: VLynn 6: Wouk, RAdams, Lamotta That's it! 7 names. You chose someone else, you are wrong. Sir Creep will count out Jake Lamotta on Sept 17. SC That's actually a pretty good analysis there. I would probably say that the king of Thailand, who's been in and out of the hospital could be a possibility. Stan Lee won't be next. I don't think he's ill in anyway shape or form. I wonder why he's even on my list. As for me, my vote still goes out to lord carrington, which strangely enough, was one of your seven. No, it's nonsense. It's well presented nonsense but it's nonsense nonetheless. 6 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
WidowsPeak 13 Posted August 21, 2016 Zsa Zsa, pleeeeeeeeease Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sir Creep 7,013 Posted August 22, 2016 As stated in The 6th Death of 2016: ___________________________________ "[T]he numerals 3-4-7-8-9 are taken, thus no one with that numeral is possible. 3: (Crowe) Gabor, MTM, Carter, Pirsig, Kissinger, Greaves 4: (Vigoda) LzSmith, Banks 7: (Reagan) Interestingly she's the only one out of fifty names! 8: (Boutras-Ghali) de Cuellar, Norden, Ali, Gascoigne 9: (Michelmore) de Havilland, Adulyadej, KDouglas, CJames, Noakes That leaves the following, but before we get there, The Reaper has made it CLEAR he is only taking folks 94 or older (unless gravely ill -- but we haven't any imo), so I'm eliminating anyone 93 or younger. 0: Prince Philip, Lord Carrington, Stan Lee (Bush, Randi, Domino, Hawking all too young) 1: Havelange, BGraham, Sallis (Gall and Dole too young) 2: None (Joost, Scales, MWalker, Forsyth all too young) 5: VLynn (Chong, Phillips, Piggott all too young) 6: Wouk, RAdams, Lamotta (Ellis, Castro, Tutu, Campbell, Chirac all too young) So there you have it, the list of 10 real possibilities, the rest are lagniappe. If you've chosen someone outside of the bold names, you are bloody wrong." ___________________________________ Ali was an outlier, period. Havelange was right on target and leaves us with: 0: Prince Philip, Lord Carrington, Stan Lee 5: VLynn 6: Wouk, RAdams, Lamotta That's it! 7 names. You chose someone else, you are wrong. Sir Creep will count out Jake Lamotta on Sept 17. SC That's actually a pretty good analysis there. I would probably say that the king of Thailand, who's been in and out of the hospital could be a possibility. Stan Lee won't be next. I don't think he's ill in anyway shape or form. I wonder why he's even on my list. As for me, my vote still goes out to lord carrington, which strangely enough, was one of your seven. No, it's nonsense. It's well presented nonsense but it's nonsense nonetheless. Haters gonna hate. 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rockhopper penguin 2,264 Posted August 22, 2016 As stated in The 6th Death of 2016: ___________________________________ "[T]he numerals 3-4-7-8-9 are taken, thus no one with that numeral is possible. 3: (Crowe) Gabor, MTM, Carter, Pirsig, Kissinger, Greaves 4: (Vigoda) LzSmith, Banks 7: (Reagan) Interestingly she's the only one out of fifty names! 8: (Boutras-Ghali) de Cuellar, Norden, Ali, Gascoigne 9: (Michelmore) de Havilland, Adulyadej, KDouglas, CJames, Noakes That leaves the following, but before we get there, The Reaper has made it CLEAR he is only taking folks 94 or older (unless gravely ill -- but we haven't any imo), so I'm eliminating anyone 93 or younger. 0: Prince Philip, Lord Carrington, Stan Lee (Bush, Randi, Domino, Hawking all too young) 1: Havelange, BGraham, Sallis (Gall and Dole too young) 2: None (Joost, Scales, MWalker, Forsyth all too young) 5: VLynn (Chong, Phillips, Piggott all too young) 6: Wouk, RAdams, Lamotta (Ellis, Castro, Tutu, Campbell, Chirac all too young) So there you have it, the list of 10 real possibilities, the rest are lagniappe. If you've chosen someone outside of the bold names, you are bloody wrong." ___________________________________ Ali was an outlier, period. Havelange was right on target and leaves us with: 0: Prince Philip, Lord Carrington, Stan Lee 5: VLynn 6: Wouk, RAdams, Lamotta That's it! 7 names. You chose someone else, you are wrong. Sir Creep will count out Jake Lamotta on Sept 17. SC That's actually a pretty good analysis there. I would probably say that the king of Thailand, who's been in and out of the hospital could be a possibility. Stan Lee won't be next. I don't think he's ill in anyway shape or form. I wonder why he's even on my list. As for me, my vote still goes out to lord carrington, which strangely enough, was one of your seven. No, it's nonsense. It's well presented nonsense but it's nonsense nonetheless. Haters gonna hate. There's no hate in death. Oh, hang on a minute.... 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Dead Cow 620 Posted August 23, 2016 Fats Domino Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GossipGabe 333 Posted September 3, 2016 Bhumibol is in and out of hospitals, clearly he's getting closer and closer to his grave. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Joey Russ 7,119 Posted September 5, 2016 If this article is true, then the king of Thailand would be dead within days: http://newsclick.in/time-face-truth-thailand-king-bhumibols-reign-over Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sir Creep 7,013 Posted September 5, 2016 He's going to have to be, Joey, as I said a while ago that Jake Lamotta will die on Sept 17. So it's a race now.SC Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rockhopper penguin 2,264 Posted September 5, 2016 If this article is true, then the king of Thailand would be dead within days: http://newsclick.in/time-face-truth-thailand-king-bhumibols-reign-over Or he's going to be kept alive until some more convenient time. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Youwanticewiththat 610 Posted September 5, 2016 Suspiciously quiet around Brucie imo......... 9th? Higher or lower? 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rockhopper penguin 2,264 Posted September 5, 2016 Suspiciously quiet around Brucie imo......... 9th? Higher or lower? I can't pick the 9th (nothing for a pair...) so higher. 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
swimguy199 1 Posted September 5, 2016 According to this article, The King of Thailand will go soon. http://newsclick.in/time-face-truth-thailand-king-bhumibols-reign-over Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rockhopper penguin 2,264 Posted September 5, 2016 According to this article, The King of Thailand will go soon. http://newsclick.in/time-face-truth-thailand-king-bhumibols-reign-over Wow, deja vu all over again. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
msc 17,762 Posted September 9, 2016 Joost, end of August. End of August was a bit over-keen, but the recent court case seems to back up the view he wont be hanging around too long now. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Joey Russ 7,119 Posted September 17, 2016 As stated in The 6th Death of 2016: ___________________________________ "[T]he numerals 3-4-7-8-9 are taken, thus no one with that numeral is possible. 3: (Crowe) Gabor, MTM, Carter, Pirsig, Kissinger, Greaves 4: (Vigoda) LzSmith, Banks 7: (Reagan) Interestingly she's the only one out of fifty names! 8: (Boutras-Ghali) de Cuellar, Norden, Ali, Gascoigne 9: (Michelmore) de Havilland, Adulyadej, KDouglas, CJames, Noakes That leaves the following, but before we get there, The Reaper has made it CLEAR he is only taking folks 94 or older (unless gravely ill -- but we haven't any imo), so I'm eliminating anyone 93 or younger. 0: Prince Philip, Lord Carrington, Stan Lee (Bush, Randi, Domino, Hawking all too young) 1: Havelange, BGraham, Sallis (Gall and Dole too young) 2: None (Joost, Scales, MWalker, Forsyth all too young) 5: VLynn (Chong, Phillips, Piggott all too young) 6: Wouk, RAdams, Lamotta (Ellis, Castro, Tutu, Campbell, Chirac all too young) So there you have it, the list of 10 real possibilities, the rest are lagniappe. If you've chosen someone outside of the bold names, you are bloody wrong." ___________________________________ Ali was an outlier, period. Havelange was right on target and leaves us with: 0: Prince Philip, Lord Carrington, Stan Lee 5: VLynn 6: Wouk, RAdams, Lamotta That's it! 7 names. You chose someone else, you are wrong. Sir Creep will count out Jake Lamotta on Sept 17. SC Unsurprisingly, Sir Creeps prediction is wrong. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Joey Russ 7,119 Posted September 19, 2016 One person got the 8th death correct: http://t1meslive.co.za/sad-news-desmond-tutu-dead-at-84-after-readmission-on-saturday/ Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rockhopper penguin 2,264 Posted September 19, 2016 One person got the 8th death correct: http://t1meslive.co.za/sad-news-desmond-tutu-dead-at-84-after-readmission-on-saturday/ Not yet but it could be close. Jake LaMotta could get run over. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JiroemonKimura 95 Posted September 19, 2016 One person got the 8th death correct: http://t1meslive.co.za/sad-news-desmond-tutu-dead-at-84-after-readmission-on-saturday/ He is not dead: http://www.news24.com/SouthAfrica/News/love-is-the-best-medicine-tutu-thanks-well-wishers-20160919 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Joey Russ 7,119 Posted September 19, 2016 One person got the 8th death correct: http://t1meslive.co.za/sad-news-desmond-tutu-dead-at-84-after-readmission-on-saturday/ He is not dead: http://www.news24.com/SouthAfrica/News/love-is-the-best-medicine-tutu-thanks-well-wishers-20160919 I saw that. The page that says he dead was fake. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Paul Bearer 5,651 Posted September 19, 2016 One person got the 8th death correct: http://t1meslive.co.za/sad-news-desmond-tutu-dead-at-84-after-readmission-on-saturday/He is not dead: http://www.news24.com/SouthAfrica/News/love-is-the-best-medicine-tutu-thanks-well-wishers-20160919 I saw that. The page that says he dead was fake. I'd wait until I had a more reliable source in future. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Joey Russ 7,119 Posted September 22, 2016 While the tide can turn at any moment, it's looking like Chirac is about to cark. A rumor this morning that he died, but has since been proven wrong, might've been really meant to be saying that he's near death. His wife also became hospitalized due to exhaustion. She might be exhausted due to hearing the news that he's about to die. It's not a guarantee, but it's definitely likely at this point. My vote isn't changing though. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
