Jump to content

lay_kulast95

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Content Count

    111

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by lay_kulast95

  2. Posted

    7 minutes ago, Master Obit said:

     

    Might I suggest that you just don't post on this thread (and forum) and confine your reporting deaths to the 110 club? I promise you that absolutely nobody on here cares that an obscure supercentenarian has just died aged 112, or that someone created a findagrave to pretend someone had died. Either you're interested in starting arguments, or you're interested in wasting your time increasing your post count on yet another forum.

     

    This forum is clearly suited to a more mature and thick-skinned audience than teenagers who have personal rankings of their favourite old people and get upset when an obscure person who they had no personal connection to dies.

     

    In a similar vein, if people on here were to go and infiltrate the 110 club and start posting loads of rubbish that nobody there was interested in, you would also have a right to be annoyed. 

    I wouldn't exactly call it a waste of time, but I do post here simply because I enjoy it. I enjoy posting to longevity forums and threads. And since you asked fairly respectfully, I will reduce my number of posts here, and post much less frequently. If you wanted me to stop posting so much, all you people had to do was ask respectfully and I wouldn't have thought you were attacking me. I understand that. Maybe this isn't the right place to post certain things like the deaths of hardly known Supercentenarians, and there's better places for that. From now,  on I'll keep my posting to a minimum. 

    • Facepalm 1

  3. Posted

    1 minute ago, Ulitzer95 said:


    I never DM’d you then. That’s a total lie. 
     

    You have never complained to me in the DMs about being left alone, on the contrary you are always looking for a fight. 
     

    It’s evident that you’re an underager and should be banned, before you make a tit of yourself any further and before Sir Creep asks you out for ice cream.

    Very well, I'll say it loud and clear. LEAVE ME THE HELL ALONE AND STOP REACTING AND QUOTING MY POSTS!!! There. Was that good enough for you? Now you, and this whole thread know that I asked you to leave me alone. We may be on this same thread, but I wish for us to not engage with each other. That means NO quoting me, and NO reacting to my posts. And quit your obsession with me as well. Idk take up golfing, or cooking, or something. In other words drop your obsession with me, and find another hobby other than bullying me. 

    • Like 2
    • Haha 1
    • Facepalm 1

  5. Posted

    Just now, Ulitzer95 said:


    What’s interesting is you’re not denying you’re a child. You shouldn’t be on here. Go outside and get some fresh air.

     

    And STOP DMing me. I’ve told you several times I do not wish to engage with you via private message. 

    I'll stop DMing YOU, when YOU stop trying to engage with ME. I simply posted about the possible, and now confirmed hoax of Gisaburo Sonobe and you started attacking me here on the forum and in the DMs. I'm simply defending myself and playing along with your stupid and time-wasting charade. YOU are the person I've told several times to LEAVE ME ALONE! Now why don't you actually leave me alone! I don't wish to speak to you. 

    • Like 2
    • Facepalm 1

  6. Posted

    Just now, Ulitzer95 said:

    Going through every single post of mine and facepalming it because you’re losing the argument is exactly what a child or adolescent would do. You’re too young. Shouldn’t be on this forum period. Go back to Habbo Hotel.

     

    IMG_5173.jpeg

    Annnnd you do the exact same thing to me. So why is it okay for you to face-palm all my posts, but me to not face-palm yours??? You're the instigator here. 

    • Like 1

  7. Posted

    And Ulitzer95 has exclaimed that I will "never get a girlfriend". I, however am not interested in getting a girlfriend, therefore his insult is in vain. He can say this as much as he likes, but he's wasting his time. 

    • Like 1

  8. Posted

    What's odd is that every time I join in on the sarcasm, people assume I'm like being fully serious, when in reality I'm not. It's almost like you guys think I'm just some big hunk of metal... a "robot", if you will. I think my humor and sarcasm is some of the funniest and the most creative here. Apparently you all think I'm electronic, and not a human. And my apologies for reading the U2 music track wrong. I thought it said "so cute" instead of "so cruel". To better explain my earlier mishap. 

    • Like 1
    • Facepalm 1

  9. Posted

    13 hours ago, Master Obit said:

     

    I'm now intrigued to know what the hard evidence was.

     

    If I had £1 for every time I'd seen hard evidence that a 110 club member was a wrong'un, I'd have more than £2 for sure. One particular member once expressed their desire to have intercourse with a tank, but he "wasn't sure how that would work logistically".

    If I had a £1 note for every time you acted like an absolute pile of defecation, I'd have enough to fill the Pacific Ocean, and end world hunger.

    • Facepalm 1

  10. Posted

    11 hours ago, Toast said:

     

    This comment after I had simply posted a U2 track seems to me a non sequitur.  Others were confused too. Do feel free to explain.

    My apologies, I misread the title of the U2 track. I thought it was a love song. Can I join in to sing on the album of discord???

    • Confused 2

  11. Posted

    21 hours ago, Ulitzer95 said:


    So CRUEL! :( 
     

      Reveal hidden contents

    Pssst who was he?

     

    Bro, I already explained several times that I am not interested in girls! Your insults don't mean anything to me. Your obsession with me however, is quite annoying. 

    • Confused 3

  12. Posted

    Just now, TQR said:


    You post like a ChatGPT answer to the prompt “write a response to the previous post in the style of a bellend”.

    I am not familiar with this response. Please try again.

  13. Posted

    2 minutes ago, Commtech Sio Bibble said:

    Yes.

    Ok, that was actually a little funny. I admit, I set myself up for that one. But I'm still going to play along... I'm thinking of my 3rd favorite supercentenarian of all time. Who are they?

    • Like 1

  15. Posted

    5 minutes ago, Commtech Sio Bibble said:

    You can hardly be playing along when your 'CRUEL hoax' comment is what spawned the sarcasm.

    And how would you know this? Do you read minds? Are you an oracle? Tell me if you understand these things. 

    • Like 1
    • Facepalm 2

  16. Posted

    Just now, Commtech Sio Bibble said:

    The rumour isn't funny (I couldn't care less) but your reaction certainly is.

    In case you couldn't tell, I was playing along with the sarcasm

  17. Posted

    Just now, drol said:

    I don't know if this is funny or creepy, but I'd go with the latter.

    I would say the web article is more gross than anything. The fact that someone would start a rumor on the death of Japan's oldest man is neither funny or creepy. 

  19. Posted

    9 hours ago, drol said:

    In fact I already picture The Sun headline "National TREASURE Gisaburo Sonobe falls victim of CRUEL hoax"

    Can you post the link to that article on The Sun please? :clap:

  20. Posted

    A matching gravestone was found for Gisaburo Sonobe confirming that he died yesterday 10 February 2024. However, his death has not been released by the public. This could be a hoax. A cruel, CRUEL hoax.

  23. Posted

    29 minutes ago, PLANet said:

    I do not claim that all supercentenarians are fake, since a large number of them has been recorded and several of them are from highly developed societies and rich environments where it would be much more difficult statistically to have a mistake in the date of birth, whether intentional or not or switch identities (in individual cases it still happens ). I am skeptical about those who are very old and those who come from very remote areas with a low life expectancy for the general population. Real hard evidence and real scientific methods are needed there to claim that they really reached this very unlikely age in a too good to be true stable shape. In other occasions a claimed very old age of 115 could be all the way down to more realistic 90-95 (we have already seen even this) or at best 110.

    All right. I'll bite this stupid piece of bait that you're trying to reel us in with, and imagine that for a second you are capable of an intelligent conversation. What do you think of the cases of Kane Tanaka? Lucile Randon? Jiroemon Kimura? Christian Mortensen? Emma Morano? Misao Okawa? Augusta Holtz? Maria Branyas Moreira? Edie Ceccarelli? Are they all "fraudsters" like you claim too? You say that cases require "hard evidence". I'd like to see some of this "hard evidence" to backup your outrageous and ridiculous claims. 

  24. Posted

    7 minutes ago, PLANet said:

    Let's see what even these organizations say

     

    Mat(t)hew Beard was an American supercentenarian claimant who was believed to have been the oldest living person in the world from the death of Emma Wilson on 13 October 1983, until his own death over a year later. He was posthumously validated as the oldest person ever, the title he held from April 1984 until his age was surpassed by Augusta Holtz in 1986. His age was validated by the Gerontology Research Group, but this was later found to be inaccurate and his validation was rescinded by LongeviQuest.

    Heaven help us...

×

Important Information

Your use of this forum is subject to our Terms of Use

  I accept