Jump to content

Jimh

Members
  • Content Count

    60
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Jimh


  1. There have been better weeks. First Mr Borlaug and now Mr Floyd. Keith may not have fed the starving but at least he tried to inspire those who had something to eat to do something good with it.

     

    One last long, lingering close up, eh?


  2. I'm guessing that you haven't listened to Woman's Hour much because your suggested topics have two factual failings.

     

    1. They are too short. A genuine WH topic introduction would go on for some time and involve several sub clauses. In the most extreme examples they twist and turn in an attempt to throw you off the scent that what they are going to be discussing just before the book reading is going to be torpor inducing. The more Pythonesque the better.

     

    2. They are far too direct. Marmalade yes/no, the many uses of Vaseline and how to make a meal for your family out of only bracken and the scrapings from their feet are all reasonably valid to at least nine people in the country. The very best WH article is relevant only to one person and they are usually a mate of the producer.


  3. Full judgement

     

    You can see why she tried to stop it being published. See how many times you can count the phrases:

    • Simply do not believe
    • There was absolutely no evidence to support this assertion
    • Make belief

    It's worth reading.

     

    Edit: An extract taken at random. Don't fret too much about the context. This is typical of the language used throughtout the whole document.

    143. In my judgment it is unnecessary to go so far as to characterise what the wife

    attempted as fraudulent. However, it is not an episode that does her any credit

    whatsoever. Either she knew or must have known that there were no loans on Thames

    Reach, yet she tried to suggest that there were and thereby obtain monies by

    underhand means.

    144. Her attempts when cross-examined to suggest that she may have got in a muddle and

    confused this property with others, to my mind, had a hollow ring. In the light of the

    husband’s generosity towards her, as I have set out, I find the wife’s behaviour

    distinctly distasteful. In any event, as Mr Mostyn rightly submitted, it damages her

    overall credibility.

    Expect a tearful "what would you expect from a male judge.? All men are bastards" appearance on GMTV in the very near furure.


  4. Yes there is a middle ground. It is called growing old gracefully. Plenty of people do it and I don't see too many complaints about it.

     

    Not having a telly I haven't seen poor Judy for many years and after seeing that picture I think you are confusing growing old gracefully with alcoholic bag lady chic.


  5. I thought he had died ages ago

    I heard the news on the radio last night and immediately felt pig ignorant. For my entire life I had thought that Marcel was victorian and had died over a century ago. What a cretin.

     

    As an aside the BBC is having a Have You Say page about Marcel asking for the great unwashed to submit their memories of Marcel and the effect he had on their lives. As you can imagine a page asking the sort of people who submit thoughts to HYS about their memories of a French mime artist is very, very busy at the moment.


  6. Trivialise? Defend? Don't think anyone is doing that.

     

    I think the general feeling was that comparing the offence with that of murder was a little on the hysterical side, to say bone headed things like "the victims of a serial killer are beyond pain" was, well, bone headed and ignorant and arrogant opinions regarding the victims of sexual abuse are not very helpful.

     

    One thought for those so fond of playing the parent card. Would it be churlish to point out that if a child is to be murdered, abused (sexually or otherwise) or used in the creation of images "enjoyed" by Mr Langham then the most likely people to do it are the parents?


  7. [snip] some drivel [/snip]

    Go on, since I'm a parent now I'll bite.

     

    The victims of serial killers are beyond pain. Ah yes, because the victims of serial killers were all childless orphans with not a friend in the world. Did you read that line after you wrote it? You seem to love playing the parent card when it comes to child abuse but not when someone has been raped, strangled and thrown in a ditch. I suppose their parents are glad to have the slag off their hands. Or something.

     

    Defending Langham? No. Suggesting that people regain a sense of perspective? Go on, I'll have a nickel's worth of that.


  8. Oh lordy, that one is a classic.

     

    They were on the Ark were they? I can't help feeling that if they'd had a few dozen dragons on board it might have merited at least one mention. And Noah said, my God those things are bloody huge. And the dragons did feast on the tigers and the lions and the anchovies and the...


  9. Free speech bears a responsibility not to abuse it.  Sorry to sound po-faced but that's the way it is.

    Complete and utter bollocks. Free speech is an absolute.

     

    I'm also amused by someone else's claim that the kid would not be famous if she did not have some terminal disease so is unworthy of inclusion. Surely that is like saying if we found out that we couldn't add Derek to the list because he is only famous because he can kick a ball straight on the odd occasion. In fact now I come to think about it DL's long term inclusion of HM the QM was unjustified because the reason for her fame was an accident of birth.

     

    If I were to make any complaint about her inclusion it would be that it were like shooting fish in a barrel.


  10. Ms Squire has fought to secure regeneration funds for her seat, home to Rosyth dockyard, and also helped to secure the future of a local coal mine.

     

    Without injecting too much politics into this thread the loathesome New Labour whore also voted for the case for war in Iraq, for top up fees, for foundation hospitals, for our glorious "anti" "terror" "legislation" and couldn't be arsed to vote in any of the readings of the ID register bill.

     

    Does anyone know which local coal mine? I'll be buggered if I can think of one in her constituency.

     

    I'll go away now and ponder who to vote for in the up coming by-election.


  11. You sad c**ts at least ronnie had a life and didn't sit around on his arse like you sad little fuckheads that frequent forums I hope I over hear one of you talking about this pathetic site in public i'll put you to the top of the list! Clickable Smilies what a pack of faggots.

    While you're here my little Opal Fruit, would you mind telling me what sort of life Myra had?

×

Important Information

Your use of this forum is subject to our Terms of Use