halleluyahjohntudor

Are you excluding the possibility that they are just turned on beyond endurance by human legs, and beside the pleasure of bestriding these lucious limbs the procreation of their own species is a mundane chore?

Let me be the first of the onrushing tributeers for the anniversary of your birth, Banshees. DL's favourite Philosopher, poet, and pizza deliverer.

'Cos boy dogs are only interested in their own pleasure?

Well, he's been on some ingenious diet - ie, eat whatever you normally do, but in smaller portions. In his case, this probably means cutting back to 3 whole bison at a single sitting. Bound to make him look peaky, a la Lord Lawson.

In that sad eventuality I'm sure that Hillary would find some way to fill the quasi-constitutional lacuna...

Alright I hate to admit this but since you have surfaced the whole idea of teenage attractions I can't help but flash back my memory back 'to the beginning' when a young Mary Tyler Moore provided my fantasy for about three minutes. In those days, surely, three minutes was much more than enough.

Surely, judging by the Saddam exhibition, you mean 'spurting'?

According to the state-run Rossiya channel he later confided that he retained sufficient faith in the country's current leadership to cast all of his 354 votes in favour of Vladimir Putin, without being put under any serious duress, and was happy to testify to his captors that it had been a free and fair election.

If they had any taste, they would surely be hoping to dine on Richard Branson.

Apparently he was on some kind of trip to Devon....

Word is that Lizzie had both of them in her youth You mean that they both had Lizzie, surely? Calm down, it was only a commercial.

None offered HCW, although, I believe, his Grandfather was Scottish. Just thought, it bloody would be with a surname of Carson! When you add the involvement of an individual with the surname 'McLaren', a sinister pattern begins to emerge....

As first posts go your snakeness, this one could well find itself a Monkey contender. I've been looking at it for a minute now and all kinds of subtleties and questions are emerging. What seemed, on the face of it, the dumbest question I've seen for a while, might have hidden meaning. After all it was posted on the Al Molinaro thread, who, unless someone can prove otherwise, is unlikely to have come anywhere within the Thatcher orbit (defined by the outer reach of her handbag). Then there are the two question marks. Does this mean there is a question behind the question, a much bigger question implied by the question, or was it simply a slip of the finger? Finally there is that smiley with the rolling eyes that suggests a certain deliberateness, as if it was posted to provoke exactly this kind of response. Or was it intended to convey irony? If so, I can't find any. My theory - and some may well scoff at the suggestion - is that you are a relatively green Tory MP, sitting just outside the lobby with your lap top, dreaming of great days past. In your isolation - not yet being one of the boys - you have been surfing on the net and somehow you not only wandered on to the DL but registered with a suitably sexy name reflecting childhood phallic fantasies. Lost in your Tory dreamland you search for the Maggie Thacher thread but stumble by chance on to this one. Still in this dreamlike (trancelike as a Cobra) state you frame your question which is more wishful thinking. You would dearly like to shout this with all your heart so that it echoes around Westminster, but instead you reach for the rolleyes smiley, click, and there it goes. And not one of your colleagues will ever know. You don't need an answer because for you, KC, Maggie Thacher will always be around, occupying your spiritual being, guiding those rolling eyes. Am I right or am I wrong? Welcome to Deathlist. Godot Our friend KC registered, posted in an inappropriate place, and immediately left. Could our visitor have been Lady T herself? On the same principle as the joke about the person who telephoned the home for the terminally bewildered, asked to speak to the resident of Room 123, and on being told that the room was empty replied 'Oh good, that means that I must have escaped'?

Who was loitering once, with intent A policeman came by with a glint in his eye but luckily turned out to be bent! DWB It doesn't quite scan. In any case, there is no evidence that Belgian policeman are more prone to the acceptance of pecuniary inducements than any other continental sleuths.

Shows how easy it can be to keep parents entertained, without having to stick them in front of CBBC all evening.

Who was loitering once, with intent A policeman came by with a glint in his eye Though he'd given up ladies for Lent.

Happy birthday Handers. You are, without a doubt, one of the nicest people on this forum.

Lighten up woman, and join a deadpool! If her heart is breaking, maybe she should pick herself before it's too late.

I'll be banging on about it until 31 December 2007. Then you all can do what you want because I've decided I won't be running in any deadpools next year. There is no point if you can't compete and I'll admit that I can't. You've done a lot better than me this year, W. But then I went for the 'Wishful Thinking' approach for all my picks. Next year I might give a trial to the 'Gosh I hope I'm wrong' strategy.

High Fidelity?

Happy Birthday, Days of Thunder

So who told you that? His boyfriend? Yes, Ron Dennis was quite.... oops. ...ready to contact him in his cockpit?

Ah, so that would be why there are folk going about in kilts... I thought that was par for the course at Buckingham Palace dinner parties?

Wouldn't the SC test be a little unfair on patients lying in biscuit-free rooms? Or, more seriously, what if the patient had just woken up and devoured every available biscuit. His/her failure to comply with the request could surely not be taken as a token of cranial inactivity?

What about the carbon footprint from your private limo, BS? Not to mention the environmental cost of your home computer.... Snip, snip snip