Lord Fellatio Nelson

You are a fabulous wordsmith CA.

That one must have been laying dormant at the bottom of your boots.What the fuck dragged it to the surface, I thought she was dead! Naked Gun repeat was on over Easter (forgot Nancy Marchand was in that), and it's been eating away at me ever since. the fact that she has made millions because if it is enough to piss off anyone. Millions, really ? Millions of what? jeez what do you think. You are not funny and stop Nit picking my posts in order to get the attention your parents didn't give you. How would you like if you accidentally misspelt something thanks to your autocorrect and a group of people started to give you shit for it. You have gone from a likeable lad into a complete arsehole. Keep it going and the only people who will bother to interact with you will be those who are not fussy what they tread in, the same people who give Z the time of day when the rest of us have fucked him off our Christmas card list.

There's always time to take up a hobby Oh I have one, cars.

Ive just heard the phone tribute and Brucie sounded very old, very frail and, almost like he has had a stroke. Three months max.

I don't think he understands the definition of a village. Villages that are very close to each other and don't have much open space between them are called estates and usually make up part of a town/city. Damn all those other houses in my village. They really spoil the view from my door. When was that taken? Last summer??

I have been arguing very coherently and responding to every point. Disprovening illogical points doesn't mean arguing incoherently.The prosecution rests m'lud.strange you argue about incoherence but then you change the topic. Get back to the death penalty you hypocritic. Strange how you anti death penslitiers enjoy ridding your high horse but then resort to childish insults.

That's not necessarily the same thing. Armed officers could legitimately take the life of a criminal if that person is about to take the life of someone. You cannot have Police standing by watching someone stab/shoot a person dead. The argument as to whether the Police were justified in shooting before asking questions is another point entirely. This country doesn't routinely arm our Police but we still have armed response units because we must. Mistakes have been made but its far less straighforwards than an actual trial by Jury jobbie. I am kind of with you. However, without proper oversight and the establishment's inherent belief (possibly shared by a majority of the population who have never encountered a police officer) that the officer will always be justified in their use of tasers/truncheons/guns/even physical restraint, there is a form of state sanctioned death penalty already in this country. The fact that so few officers are even taken the distance of prosecution, never mind trial, for any offence should put the shiters up anyone. Well, personally, id not neccessarily trust a Police officer to tell me the right time. Having said that, and I get your points, there isn't going to be a Police officer in the country who would want to be armed and take the risk that they could be put away for getting it wrong, or so it later transpires. Personally, Id not do that kind of job, whatever way you cut it, you have a split second decision to make that could see you infront of a jury and, possibly, Imprisoned. The lack of convictions of Police officers is as much to do with public perception and opinion than anything else.The CPS, obviously, didn't feel that they could secure a conviction and that would have been as much based on previous trials where coppers have been aquitted as anything else. The public wants it both ways, they want protection from a crazed manic with a machete/ bomb vest but they expect the Police to make the right move everytime all of the time. That's proven to be impossible in the past.

it's getting harder and harder to come with an argument against the DEATH penalty. I have beaten you in this debate loser.Killing people is wrong. That's why we have a law against it.and breaking that law is punishable by death.Just a point of reference.It is suggested that, due to technological advances, DNA etc, the chances of wrongful conviction is remote to nil. The famous Hanratty case was finally closed decades later when DNA was extracted from articles at the murder scene which 'proved' Hanratty had committed murder. Based on that new evidence the 'James Hanratty was innocent' lobby had to drop their claim that a miscarriage of justice had occoured. Fast forward to recent times and you had the Barry George trial where one of the major reasons the CPS pressed forward in charging George for murdering Jill Dando was the gunpowder residue found in his coat pocket. On the overturning of his conviction it was stated that this residue could have been due to cross contamination by a careless scenes of crime officer. The point? Capital punishment would have seen George murdered by the state even though he was actually innocent. There is not a single fucking reason on this Planet for any state to take the life of an individual because you cannot have a scenario where people could be wrongly convicted, killed and be assumed that it was a risk worth taking. Anyway, if ive got elements of those cases wrong, fuck it, ive not researched it all, its off the top of my head. The points still stand though. not really since executions are meet with tons of appeals so he wouldn't have been executed. You think everyone in prison is innocent the truth is tons of innocent people have served life imprisonment and yet you here no one scream abolish life imprisonment. In fact when you think of it life imprisonment is the same you just wait for the prisoner to go naturally instead of just doing it yourself. The DEATH penalty just speeds up the process. You truly are as thick as fucking shit.

That's not necessarily the same thing. Armed officers could legitimately take the life of a criminal if that person is about to take the life of someone. You cannot have Police standing by watching someone stab/shoot a person dead. The argument as to whether the Police were justified in shooting before asking questions is another point entirely. This country doesn't routinely arm our Police but we still have armed response units because we must. Mistakes have been made but its far less straighforwards than an actual trial by Jury jobbie.

it's getting harder and harder to come with an argument against the DEATH penalty. I have beaten you in this debate loser.Killing people is wrong. That's why we have a law against it.and breaking that law is punishable by death. Just a point of reference. It is suggested that, due to technological advances, DNA etc, the chances of wrongful conviction is remote to nil. The famous Hanratty case was finally closed decades later when DNA was extracted from articles at the murder scene which 'proved' Hanratty had committed murder. Based on that new evidence the 'James Hanratty was innocent' lobby had to drop their claim that a miscarriage of justice had occoured. Fast forward to recent times and you had the Barry George trial where one of the major reasons the CPS pressed forward in charging George for murdering Jill Dando was the gunpowder residue found in his coat pocket. On the overturning of his conviction it was stated that this residue could have been due to cross contamination by a careless scenes of crime officer. The point? Capital punishment would have seen George murdered by the state even though he was actually innocent. There is not a single fucking reason on this Planet for any state to take the life of an individual because you cannot have a scenario where people could be wrongly convicted, killed and be assumed that it was a risk worth taking. Anyway, if ive got elements of those cases wrong, fuck it, ive not researched it all, its off the top of my head. The points still stand though. I like and appreciate your point. However mine is slightly different. Even if you are 100% certain of guilt (Ted Bundy for example) the state has no right to sanction the taking of life without giving up it's moral imperative and therefore its legitimacy as a state. Granting oneself the power over life and death is the ultimate totalitarianism. I don't disagree. I don't believe in it, period.

it's getting harder and harder to come with an argument against the DEATH penalty. I have beaten you in this debate loser.Killing people is wrong. That's why we have a law against it.and breaking that law is punishable by death. Just a point of reference. It is suggested that, due to technological advances, DNA etc, the chances of wrongful conviction is remote to nil. The famous Hanratty case was finally closed decades later when DNA was extracted from articles at the murder scene which 'proved' Hanratty had committed murder. Based on that new evidence the 'James Hanratty was innocent' lobby had to drop their claim that a miscarriage of justice had occoured. Fast forward to recent times and you had the Barry George trial where one of the major reasons the CPS pressed forward in charging George for murdering Jill Dando was the gunpowder residue found in his coat pocket. On the overturning of his conviction it was stated that this residue could have been due to cross contamination by a careless scenes of crime officer. The point? Capital punishment would have seen George murdered by the state even though he was actually innocent. There is not a single fucking reason on this Planet for any state to take the life of an individual because you cannot have a scenario where people could be wrongly convicted, killed and be assumed that it was a risk worth taking. Anyway, if ive got elements of those cases wrong, fuck it, ive not researched it all, its off the top of my head. The points still stand though.

That one must have been laying dormant at the bottom of your boots. What the fuck dragged it to the surface, I thought she was dead!

I always assumed that a bird was vogel or are all birds called cunt in Germany???

Now it all makes sense.......

just imagine the meal hes going to get as his last one? going to cost a fortune! everythings bigger in texas right? even the steak The steak size in Texas I can confirm as being lunatic compared at least with the UK. There was a 'cowgirl' steak of 20oz, and a 'cowboy' steak of 28oz on a menu in one establishment. Who needs the death penalty when you can be served a cholesterol heart attack in one sitting?Texas no longer gives a special last meal. The condemned gets the same as all the other inmates on that day.thank you for this completely obvious and easy to know information. It really helps people who struggle with simple concepts such as yourself.If you are struggling with the concept of yourself there is therapy available.it's getting harder and harder to come with an argument against the DEATH penalty. I have beaten you in this debate loser. Im all for bringing back hanging. Id have you hung by your bollocks.

How about you either create a new profile and actually join or just fuck off because you are an irritating cunt.don't mind him he just hates guests but you should really get an account. You can enter deathpool and vote on polls. That's crap. I don't mind guests but I fucking hate them when they continually post on here and cant be bothered to register. Those ones should be fucked off and blocked, if possible. Besides, even for a guest, they are a monumentally shit poster.

I didn't realise they were that aggressive!! We have loads here, they waddle in and out of our local Tescos, nobody bats an eyelid.

How about you either create a new profile and actually join or just fuck off because you are an irritating cunt.

Well a few of us did club together, picked him to sort out SC. Flipping the truck failed so....................

Hope you recover quickly Mr. Creepy. Try public transport next time. FTFY Public transportation doesn't work for American who buy trucks. Try bringing home a deer, bear or moose on a bus. Oh I don't know, there are some *Americans* that are considerably fatter larger than a deer, bear or moose and they fit on busses there, right? * Applies to the British too.

Hope you recover quickly Mr. Creepy. Try public transport next time. FTFY

Shame you didn't break your fingers. You redeemed yourself with that one.

It's an excerpt from a book Take it you don't do books ? Not if I can help it.