in eternum+

And it's only 11:30. Impressive!

May I ask what the Warn-O-Meter is for? For what should we expect to receive a warning? What is the result of too many warnings? How many warnings is too many? Does spanking figure into any of this?

Thank God!

Ah... gotcha.

Well I have chat working again but I was messing with the settings a short while ago - is it a pop-up blocker issue? Well Grim, yes it was! Turned the popup blocker off, and it worked!

I can't get in!

I'm sorry, but why are you referring to him as a 'loser'? Though my knowledge of middle eastern politics is limited, the few links provided here do not indicate that he is particularly unsavoury. I hope you are not simply expressing racist sentiment.

Although Bou may be a bit shy, I reckon she'd make a great interviewee for your radio programme. Of course, from what I understand she wouldn't be seen dead in Ireland [sound effect: canned laughter, hoots, whistles, applause].

Ooooooh... noteriety!

Do you mean a calendar like this? An excellent idea!

May I say, scsi, that I thoroughly enjoyed your company Saturday night - as well as that of HoS, LadyG, Bou, and CP! Good times...

Thought you were from Baltimore? (Or is that the same place? DC's not in Baltimore, is it?) How's the blizzard treated y'all?

Guests can't post anymore?? Admittedly, I hated some of the guests who posted (!), but some did provide quality entertainment! And some of them sparked some really good, proper, lively debates as well. Is there no middle ground? I mean, I don't like it when the threads are overrun by crappy, pointless guest posts, but on the other hand, surely there's room for some guest posts? Maybe the "Irate Visitors" thread could remain open to them? Another problem with this (well, as I see it anyway, as mentioned elsewhere) is: won't this lead to zillions of people becoming members, posting something crappy once or twice, and then disappearing into oblivion? Or worse yet, not disappearing, and having rights that guests don't have, so that we have to put up with them? Nightmare! (And this from a member whose computer was practically knackered by a nasty guest's link over the weekend!)

I think Boudicca accidentally deleted it. Really?? I'm practically attached via umbilical cord to this forum all weekend, and the second I elect to actually leave the house, something of this magnitude happens?? Cudos, Bou

Right all - Are you aware that the Wiki Wars are unfolding, all around us, as I type this message?! We really do have a VERY exciting battle afoot: Our hero, RMHED* continues to rage against the machine that is Qualtoo. Archnemesis of the DL Qualtoo** continues to torment the DP/DL page. Recent edits (aka since my last update, above) stand as follows: 11.02.06 Four removal edits by Qualtoo (21:14, 21:22, 23:24, 23:25); two addition edits by RMHED (19:03, 23:04) [Editor's note: Quiet day yesterday. I believe a peaceful game of football occurred at some point, as well.] 12.02.06 Action today has played out thus: @ 00:00: RMHED edits, stating: added internal link @ 00:25: Quatloo edits, stating: rv changes @ 01:56: RMHED edits, stating: rv needless rv @ 02:18: RMHED edits, stating: added external link @ 02:34: Quatloo edits, stating: rv changes @ 02:48: RMHED edits, stating: rv edits @ 03:22: Qualtoo edits, stating: rv changes @ 14:21: RMHED edits, stating: rv @ 20:26: Quatloo edits, stating: rv changes @ 20:37: RMHED edits, stating: rv changes @ 20:49: Quatloo edits, stating: rv changes @ 20:52: RMHED edits, stating: rv poor judgement changes @ 20:54: Quatloo edits, stating: rv changes @ 21:15: RMHED edits, stating: rv changes Oof! I'm all hot and bothered from the excitement! Seems like as the competition has gotten more and more fierce, words have become superfluous. The gauntlet is well and truly down. Remember folks: just because the cameras have gone home, doesn't mean the war isn't still being waged. *who is not an obsessive nutter, as he is our hero. **who is an obsessive nutter, for obvious reasons.

Well now, that is a crying shame. And I was so keen to hear if CP's housemate Louie ever showed up last night...

Could you possibly ask him to hang on until next year. Then keep us posted?

Place it again! Anything to contradict the edits of the incompetant Qualtoo...

Soz Guest - Another guest's earlier posting of an external link practically crashed my computer. Am now extremely dubious.

WARNING! This could well be the same guest who posted a link that f*cked up my computer earlier!

W90 - Couldn't help noticing that Qualtoo removed the link to your new dead pool from the Wiki Dead Pool site, stating "This internal link doesn't belong". How strange that a link to a dead pool doesn't belong in the Wiki Dead Pool entry!

(Link disabled - Boudicca) It is nasty and made many screens on my computer start flashing like crazy!! It requires immediate deletion!!!

Well worth the money, then. regards, Hein And... MBA has just very kindly PM'ed me, to advise of the following: The ultimate fruit of a fruitful discussion in the Deadchat room! Does it get any better than this?

The ages don't work that way on here.. If your born in 1920 this year you would be turning 86. Which Clive Dunn seems to lie about his age. Oh, so the ages shown on the front screen are the ages they're turning this year?

After all Tempus, Lou Rawls isn't going to be 71. There is another wrong age that should be left as is. Clive Dunn's age is even wrong? I actually believe CLS's age is also wrong. If he was born in 1908, wouldn't that mean he just turned 97, not 98?