maryportfuncity

Decorated and distinguished pilot in WW2 and a fairly successful CIA career before he was president. He's done a lot others couldn't do. I think you're struggling to prove Bush's idiocy. Rather like others - Thatcher, Blair - there's no disputing his basic intelligence. Now when it comes to arguing if he was misguided or just plain wrong a few times................

Yeah, but nowhere near as long as David Crosby's new liver. I'm willing to bet if that liver could have understood that David Crosby was waiting it would have joined a union and tried to avoid it's new home.

Ooh, now this is gonna call for some hard thinking and a complicated answer...... got it: the answer is 'Yes.' So long as you stick to identifying and presenting verifiable information you're on solid ground.

True enough but if I had to pick it'd be Bush Jnr!

For as long as we have overpaid, under-talented bullshitters who think themselves somehow more important than the rest of humanity I hope we also have people like Joan Rivers.

BS, I trawl the DL in deep admiration of your wit and intelligence but where low grade football is concerned it strikes me you're talking BS. There is disappointment and then there is CUFC 91/92, trust me, I'm an expert in these matters.

Mike Graham's performance in the final half of the 91/92 season is unquestionably my most painful memory as a Carlisle supporter.

I wouldn't swear by the following but: Legally speaking you're on very dodgy ground as there's no evidence CD sought or enjoyed the experience. The smattering of good news for you is in his health and reputation. Anyone fighting his legal corner would have to prove he had any reputation left to lose - possible since you're defaming his character and therefore possibly limiting the value of his existing work - but still not a given, legally speaking. Useful precedents on their side would be the plummeting value of the work of Gary Glitter and Jonathan King over the last few years. Also, there would be some pressure on his side - legally speaking - to show he supported the action and it would therefore be incumbent on his legal team to gather evidence that he understood any court proceedings. Incidentally, Charlie would be under no obligation to take the stand himself once said evidence was produced.

You'd get longish odds on George Cole at the moment so if you put in a good bet it'd be a 'nice little earner.'

If there's a God he's likely to spare Carter for a while and claim Ford and Bush Snr. Just my opinion, like.

Guys, has anyone seen Josco, I've been trying to text him for over an hour, hang on there's someone at my door, back in a minute.............................

If we could count 'life' other than individual people I think Veritas: the political party founded by Robert Kilroy Silk to fight the 2005 election, will die in 2006 when every annual subscription runs out. Put it this way: the web site is up for sale.

I'm in favour of the death penalty for surviving DLters still breathing on the 31st of December in any given year.

Q - Why did the baker have brown hands? A - Cos he kneaded a S**t!

Isn't he the guy from Little Britain

Arf arf. Presumably people are aware - re football - that Arthur Anderson, as in the very old scotsman, was there when the British and German troops played football at Christmas 1914. Arthur himself opted not to turn out.

I think this should be a lesson to the likes of me. Clearly B.A. didn't get rich frittering her money away on bets about the likely dates of death of the elderly. Not that I'm gonna risk more but I'm now of the opinion she'll see 2006.

Doubtful I'd say. Surely there are 50 more likely if we look amongst the postings over on the forum.

Someone already posted the one about the butchers and 'Best liver for sale' further up this thread.

Not sure he's in such bad shape. He's also pretty busy working, including an appearance in the latest series of Little Britain.

So the man has issues and is prone to losing some of the plot (heh heh), always a good sign when we're looking to shorten the DL odds.

The former prime minister - ie the guy elected after the war - now reckons the place is as lawless and indefensible on human rights as it was under Saddam.

A mate of mine in the media industry rates Archer as the single most objectionable individual - as in arrogant, insensitive, massive ego/little talent - he's ever met. Since he's met many others you'd stick in that category this is worth taking on board. However, Archer's a former athlete who's kept himself in shape so his health seems assured for years to come.

I think any Richard O' Sullivan fans, exploring the sight, would struggle with most of the above.

Not much sign of that gloating post since August 30th. Does anyone have any inside information that might help us assess him for 2006?