Grim Reaper 186 Posted December 31, 2004 This is the place to discuss Jake Lamotta Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest IYG Posted January 4, 2005 Hmm, am I the only one who hates Raging Bull with a passion??? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Banshees Scream Posted January 5, 2005 Jack could soon be taking good old Max Schmelings place Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
honez 79 Posted January 7, 2005 Banshees Scream said: Jack could soon be taking good old Max Schmelings place What would he want with his place? (Answer: chips and mushy peas) 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Jimmy Fitzsimmons Posted January 16, 2005 Jake LaMotta was a professional fighter, with a chin of granite and heart bigger than a lion! A man who feared no fighter in the ring nor man on the street. A figher who beat the best of the best in his day. A man who learned what the word "comeback" was all about later in life. He fought all commers and then some. Hail to the Ragging Bull!!! My kind of fighter bar none. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Dinny Posted January 16, 2005 I just don't know how anyone could not like Raging Bull. I just watched it again last night and Robert Di Niro did an amazing job in that film. He deserved every inch of that academy award for the roll he portrayed. I was aware of the fighting Jake LaMotta did but never really watched him fight as I wasn't a fight buff at that age, I was in high school at the time, or perhaps grammar school, but still, the movie was amazing to me. Except for the parts where he was beating his wife. That was disturbing, obviously Jake was a bull, a real horible person who deserved everything he got after he was champ, I mean the jail and the desertion of his family, but the acting DiNiro did was still amazing! How could you not agree with that? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest IYG Posted January 16, 2005 Dinny said: I just don't know how anyone could not like Raging Bull. I just watched it again last night and Robert Di Niro did an amazing job in that film. He deserved every inch of that academy award for the roll he portrayed. I was aware of the fighting Jake LaMotta did but never really watched him fight as I wasn't a fight buff at that age, I was in high school at the time, or perhaps grammar school, but still, the movie was amazing to me. Except for the parts where he was beating his wife. That was disturbing, obviously Jake was a bull, a real horible person who deserved everything he got after he was champ, I mean the jail and the desertion of his family, but the acting DiNiro did was still amazing! How could you not agree with that? I have problems regarding Martin Scorsese movies, I can't stand most of them. I saw Raging Bull and I heard all the hype about how great it is and blah blah blah and I was just bored, I wanted it to end, the pain of watching it was unbearable. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest yeah rite Posted January 22, 2005 you sound like a little siisy boy that dont like ta fight anyone that is all about fightin would love this movie and if ya a cyber nerd you should look up movies like funny face ya sissy boy Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest IYG Posted January 23, 2005 Thank you for that wonderful insight oh stupid one who can not type, I'll be sure to take your advice. In the words of Russel Crowe: "Making movies, making songs and fighting round the world." Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Anoki Posted January 31, 2005 IYG said: I have problems regarding Martin Scorsese movies, I can't stand most of them. I saw Raging Bull and I heard all the hype about how great it is and blah blah blah and I was just bored, I wanted it to end, the pain of watching it was unbearable. Your criticism of "Raging Bull" is tainted by the fact that you dislike most of the work of one of the greatest filmmakers of our time. You obviously have no taste, nor do you possess any appreciation of true brilliance. Your personal favorites are likely to be "Gone in 60 Seconds" and "Jaws: The Revenge". Revel in your ignorance. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Paul Bearer 6,130 Posted January 31, 2005 Quote You obviously have no taste, nor do you possess any appreciation of true brilliance. Your personal favorites are likely to be "Gone in 60 Seconds" and "Jaws: The Revenge". Revel in your ignorance Actually, mine is Scooby Doo Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Typhoid Harry 23 Posted January 31, 2005 Roobyroobyroo... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
honez 79 Posted January 31, 2005 Anoki said: Revel in your ignorance. We all revel in our own ignorance. If we weren't ignorant to a large degree we'd go mad. No-one knows everything about everything. Even you. I suspect you may not have postulated a solution to Fermat's Last Theorem, or come up with string theory, or are not a brain surgeon. But because you happen to like films that M. Scorsese has made, you believe this somehow elevates you above other "ignorant" people, who happen to disagree with you. This sounds wrong to me. I am better than you because I like this/do this and you are inferior because you do not. I'd say you're the one with the problem, not IYG. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest IYG Posted February 1, 2005 Anoki said: IYG said: I have problems regarding Martin Scorsese movies, I can't stand most of them. I saw Raging Bull and I heard all the hype about how great it is and blah blah blah and I was just bored, I wanted it to end, the pain of watching it was unbearable. Your criticism of "Raging Bull" is tainted by the fact that you dislike most of the work of one of the greatest filmmakers of our time. You obviously have no taste, nor do you possess any appreciation of true brilliance. Your personal favorites are likely to be "Gone in 60 Seconds" and "Jaws: The Revenge". Revel in your ignorance. But did you know that Raging Bull which was the second movie I watched by Scorsese (Taxi Driver was the first) caused my dislike for him? I'll admit I like certain Scorsese movies but most of them are on my dislike list. I'll also admit to liking Gone in 60 Seconds but that's because of Angelina Jolie and even the great Michael Caine couldn't save Jaws: The Revenge. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Typhoid Harry 23 Posted February 2, 2005 (edited) BOCA RATON, Fla. (AP) - Boxer Jake LaMotta's ex-wife has died. The former middleweight champ's marriage to Brooklyn-born beauty Vicki LaMotta was portrayed in the film "Raging Bull." She was 75 years old. Her family says she died in a hospital in Boca Raton, Florida, about six months after undergoing open heart surgery. In the movie, Robert DeNiro plays the boxer who is obsessed with his young wife, played by Cathy Moriarty. The real Vicki LaMotta posed nude for Playboy in 1981, when she was 51 years old -- saying she did it to show life doesn't end at 30. LaMotta later lent her name to a cosmetics line, made commercials and appeared on television and at fight arenas. Husbands often follow closely after wives... Edited February 3, 2005 by Typhoid Harry Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest ibby Posted March 24, 2005 hey.. wot gets my vote in ragin bull is the fact tht de niro put on so much weight for it! but back to topic.. ye it'd b kewl if he died.. cos he boring now Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest matthew Posted April 12, 2005 maybe everyone here has forgotten that jake lamotta isnt just a character in a movie. the topic was jake lamotta not raging bull. and i dont understand why anyone would think it was cool if he died, you put your post on the internet about him, does anyone post about you? jake lamotta cant be that bad of a guy because raging bull was based on a book that HE wrote, therefore he would have to know that he was a monster or he would have never portrayed himself like that. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest One Man Jury Posted April 12, 2005 matthew said: maybe everyone here has forgotten that jake lamotta isnt just a character in a movie. the topic was jake lamotta not raging bull. and i dont understand why anyone would think it was cool if he died, you put your post on the internet about him, does anyone post about you? jake lamotta cant be that bad of a guy because raging bull was based on a book that HE wrote, therefore he would have to know that he was a monster or he would have never portrayed himself like that. He could simply be a twit, of course. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest matthew Posted April 12, 2005 yeah someone trying to let his badness out in the open and move on with his life makes him a twit. hes not a twit your just a moron. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest One Man Jury Posted April 12, 2005 matthew said: yeah someone trying to let his badness out in the open and move on with his life makes him a twit. hes not a twit your just a moron. Like Michael Jackson maybe. That should employ your single brain cell for a moment your retard. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Josco 49 Posted April 12, 2005 One Man Jury said: matthew said: yeah someone trying to let his badness out in the open and move on with his life makes him a twit. hes not a twit your just a moron. Like Michael Jackson maybe. That should employ your single brain cell for a moment your retard. Does your anger prevent proof reading? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest One Man Jury Posted April 13, 2005 josco said: One Man Jury said: matthew said: yeah someone trying to let his badness out in the open and move on with his life makes him a twit. hes not a twit your just a moron. Like Michael Jackson maybe. That should employ your single brain cell for a moment your retard. Does your anger prevent proof reading? Yep, the red mist descends. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Banshees Scream 110 Posted May 4, 2005 It would be something if Lamotta passed this year. In the boxing catagory we would be 2 for 2... but what are the odds? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gunjaman5000 32 Posted May 4, 2005 Banshees Scream said: It would be something if Lamotta passed this year. In the boxing catagory we would be 2 for 2... but what are the odds? 2 to 1 on that he throws it in the 86th round. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest matthew Posted May 5, 2005 haha you guys are awful, jakes an idol, i hope he lives because i wanna meet him. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites