Charlotte's Controller 195 Posted September 16, 2021 Being a practical person, much of the cladding used on high rise buildings has not benn up to spec. Court and legal cases will but delay issues and bring no quick remedy. Solution, avoid time, legal costs end user/purchaser issues and provide immediate resolution of issues. Liability lies with regulators, insurers, manufacturers, architects and builders. The end consumer deserves a level of protection. The builders make enough margin to cover costs the architects have insurance (also should know better) the manufacturers did know better. The issue does not need to be dragged out bur resolved quickly. The purchasers of the high rise properties are not to blame. With hindsight no one would have bought the flats from these profit merchants. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TQR 14,391 Posted September 17, 2021 I can just tell this thread’s gonna be an absolute banger. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
gcreptile 10,970 Posted September 17, 2021 Homelessness could be a solution. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Dying Probably 578 Posted September 17, 2021 Remind me how many threads Charlotte's Controller has made? Good life. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lord Fellatio Nelson 6,218 Posted September 17, 2021 Staggering, truly staggering. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Charlotte's Controller 195 Posted September 18, 2021 19 hours ago, Dying Probably said: Remind me how many threads Charlotte's Controller has made? Good life. I would probably have started a new thread for that. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Charlotte's Controller 195 Posted January 10, 2022 Developments today, developers to pay, Nuremberg type excuses to bounce back on architects. I can see a lot of short term provisions in accounts to avoid taxation. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
