maryportfuncity 10,646 Posted November 23, 2005 hahaha you are right Glad to have been of service. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Canadian Paul 97 Posted November 24, 2005 Forgive my ignorance, but just out of curiosity, if we knew someone were to be executed, could we put them on the list anyhow according to the unwritten rules? A lot of deadpools don't allow that, since that sort of takes the fun out the game, but I was just wondering what the stance would be on that? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
millwall32 114 Posted November 24, 2005 Forgive my ignorance, but just out of curiosity, if we knew someone were to be executed, could we put them on the list anyhow according to the unwritten rules? A lot of deadpools don't allow that, since that sort of takes the fun out the game, but I was just wondering what the stance would be on that? I think our stance on it would be , "This is the DEATHlist and not the "Those -who died -but- only -through -natural -causes" list. And a death is a death is a death." Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lady Die 63 Posted November 24, 2005 Forgive my ignorance, but just out of curiosity, if we knew someone were to be executed, could we put them on the list anyhow according to the unwritten rules? A lot of deadpools don't allow that, since that sort of takes the fun out the game, but I was just wondering what the stance would be on that? I don't think knowing someone was going to be executed would take the "fun out of the game". There would still be the excitement of not knowing whether they'd be executed that year. I don't know what the situation is in Vietnam but in the USA people sometimes stay on death row for years. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Teddy 21 Posted November 24, 2005 A lot would depend on whether they were famous before they were sent for execution. In the same way we would question the inclusion of anyone who was famous because of a terminal illness (ie Jane Tomlinson), then I think we would exclude anyone famous solely because they were on death row. However in this case, Gaz, like Saddam, is famous for more than just facing execution. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lady Die 63 Posted November 24, 2005 He's been detained for 4 months. He looks like Elizabeth I without his wig .... well not actually like her but very different with/without wig ... if you see what I mean. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
maryportfuncity 10,646 Posted November 24, 2005 Glitter's newly appointed lawyer, Le Thanh Kinh, said: "What newspapers reported is just hearsay but there has not been any medical certificates to prove there was child sex abuse and how it was conducted." I wasn't aware medical certificates were required, even in Vietnam, when witness testimony was available. His teaching career is 'hearsay' a lot of what's in the papers - like his 1999 jail sentence - is fact. And it probably won't help his case if any of it is admitted in a Vietnamese court. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lady Die 63 Posted November 25, 2005 He's going to be charged with engaging in perverse activities with children. What a great euphemism. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
maryportfuncity 10,646 Posted November 25, 2005 engaging in perverse activities with children Some of his worst records, sold to 12 year olds, would also come into that category. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lady Die 63 Posted November 25, 2005 engaging in perverse activities with children Some of his worst records, sold to 12 year olds, would also come into that category. I think I may have bought one of his records when I was 12..... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
maryportfuncity 10,646 Posted November 25, 2005 No kidding, I've got his greatest hits on a double CD. They're not all his songs, it's made up to two discs by some Glitter Band songs. Saw him live too, where he was brilliant but then everyone thought it was ironic when he did those big revival tours. Once he'd had his little problem at PC World the odd title like 'What Your Mamma Don't See (You're Mamma Don't Know) didn't seem so funny anymore. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Canadian Paul 97 Posted November 25, 2005 No kidding, I've got his greatest hits on a double CD. They're not all his songs, it's made up to two discs by some Glitter Band songs. Saw him live too, where he was brilliant but then everyone thought it was ironic when he did those big revival tours. Once he'd had his little problem at PC World the odd title like 'What Your Mamma Don't See (You're Mamma Don't Know) didn't seem so funny anymore. He had more than one hit on your side of the pond? I heard Rock and Roll Part 1. Simply terrible. Any better reccomendations? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
maryportfuncity 10,646 Posted November 25, 2005 Pretty much all the ones that made the top ten. Rock N Roll Pt 1 is a rythm track pretending to be a song. Once he and his producer had realised he could get radio play as well as plays in discos they wrote songs he could perform on tv pop shows and cleaned up for a year or two. You've probably heard 'Doing All Right With the Boys' because Joan Jett had a big hit with it in the USA and Canada. It's typical of his style, heavy drums, simple bass, chanted chorus. If you were hunting a download I'd suggest 'I Love You Love Me Love' as the best of the lot. Or maybe, 'Oh Yes, You're Beautiful' a real kitsch classic. If only he hadn't meant every word of what he sang he'd have been a pop genius. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Harvester Of Souls 40 Posted November 26, 2005 Would anyone say that Mr Gadd has been rehabilitated? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Cerberus 302 Posted November 26, 2005 Talking of his music, I'd be interested to know if there is a general radio boycott of his hits nowadays. For example, every Sunday Dale Winton plays a vintage chart (usually from the 60s or 70s) on Pick of the Pops on Radio 2. As he normally plays the top 10 in full, I wonder if the producer is avoiding those weeks when GG was riding high in the charts. And likewise for Jonathan King, presumably. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
maryportfuncity 10,646 Posted November 26, 2005 Glitter isn't officially banned but - unofficially - is given a wide berth. Similarly in record shops. T.Rex, Slade and even lesser lights like The Sweet, Suzi Quatro and Mud are generally in stock in your local HMV, often with a selection of reissues and compilations. Glitter - by contrast - is reduced to the one double CD of greatest hits. Re Jonathan King, he's almost totally ignored. Mainly on grounds of producing so much lighweight crap. Put it this way. The NME reviewing his greatest hits years ago described it as: 'The sound of a butterfly farting in a human face, forever.' The one and only album available today is 'King of Hits' priced around £13-00 - 16-00, sounds like the value of his work is holding up, until you realise it's an 8 CD package. AVOID, it's complete shite. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Harvester Of Souls 40 Posted November 26, 2005 Glitter isn't officially banned but - unofficially - is given a wide berth. Similarly in record shops. T.Rex, Slade and even lesser lights like The Sweet, Suzi Quatro and Mud are generally in stock in your local HMV, often with a selection of reissues and compilations. Glitter - by contrast - is reduced to the one double CD of greatest hits. Re Jonathan King, he's almost totally ignored. Mainly on grounds of producing so much lighweight crap. Put it this way. The NME reviewing his greatest hits years ago described it as: 'The sound of a butterfly farting in a human face, forever.' The one and only album available today is 'King of Hits' priced around £13-00 - 16-00, sounds like the value of his work is holding up, until you realise it's an 8 CD package. AVOID, it's complete shite. What about Pete Townshend? Is this a grey area? It was 'research' after all. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
maryportfuncity 10,646 Posted November 26, 2005 He played Live8, to a global audience estimated towards the one billion mark. Not exactly 'banned' then. I wonder if Pete Townsend is considering taking up that recently vacated English teaching job in Vietnam Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Tempus Fugit 214 Posted December 2, 2005 He's going to be charged with engaging in perverse activities with children. What a great euphemism. He's now being investigated for raping children, This does carry the death penalty. So how do they execute people in Vietnam? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Canadian Paul 97 Posted December 2, 2005 He's going to be charged with engaging in perverse activities with children. What a great euphemism. He's now being investigated for raping children, This does carry the death penalty. So how do they execute people in Vietnam? By Firing Squad Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Youth in Asia 1,087 Posted December 2, 2005 c'mon c'mon ... c'mon c'mon ... c'mon c'mon c'mon put him on the 2006 list Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
maryportfuncity 10,646 Posted December 3, 2005 Spare a though for the Glitterband, struggling to keep all their bookings in the diary despite thinking their former frontman a stuck up prima donna and parting company from him over a couple of decades ago. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Godot 149 Posted December 3, 2005 Maybe they could give him mine clearance duties. If he wore his stack heels it would cushion the blow. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Harvester Of Souls 40 Posted December 3, 2005 He's now being investigated for raping children, This does carry the death penalty. So how do they execute people in Vietnam? By Firing Squad I wonder if they'll show his execution on the internet. It probably won't act as a deterrant for sex holidaying kiddy fiddlers but it would make a damn good educational video on Vietnamese justice. From the link kindly provided by Canadian Paul it appears that the American's fired up old sparky for a single 'singe' venture last year... that's interesting. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest A viewer Posted December 6, 2005 Gary Glitters agent rang him today to say that he has been offered a part as the new Dr who next year. He will be acting alongside Kay nine (K9) and Carol eleven Share this post Link to post Share on other sites