Name A Million Dead People

[Rotten Ali 600]

I know it's late but 115 plus 828,507 looks more like 828,622. '23 for OBL, '24 for whoever, '25 for Sadam.

 

May as well say

828,626. Robin Hood (world first socialist)

 

Has anyone done kings and queens of England yet?

[Rotten Ali 600]

Here's another big one... Over 700 pages and that's just about un fathomable.

 

http://www.rafinfo.org.uk/BCWW2Losses/BC-RoH-casstats.htm

 

2nd World War / RAF deaths come to 55,573.

 

828,627 to 884,199.

[time 8,617]

Here's another big one... Over 700 pages and that's just about un fathomable.

 

http://www.rafinfo.o...oH-casstats.htm

 

2nd World War / RAF deaths come to 55,573.

 

828,627 to 884,199.

I've a feeling some of those aircrew will be duplicates of the names on Commonwealth war graves site I linked to previously.

[time 8,617]

I know it's late but 115 plus 828,507 looks more like 828,622. '23 for OBL, '24 for whoever, '25 for Sadam.

 

May as well say

828,626. Robin Hood (world first socialist)

 

Has anyone done kings and queens of England yet?

It is, it is and no.

[Perfect Passing 277]

Dismissing the 2nd World War/RAF deaths totalling 55,573,

due to some duplications with names on the Commonwealth War Graves Post.

Until an official ruling is made by the powers that be of course..............

 

The Three Original Stooges: -

 

828,627. Moe Howard

828,628. Curly Howard and

828,629. Larry Fine

 

Not forgetting Curly Howard's replacement, his brother

828,630. Shemp Howard

 

 

[The Unknown Man 585]

828,631. Billy Preston

[Perfect Passing 277]

828,632. Bob Holness

[the_engineer 1,415]

828,633. emperor wu of han

 

828,634. qin shihuang

 

828,635 . emperor puyi

[CaptainChorizo 1,983]

828,636 . Jesus Franco

828,637 .Bigas Luna

828,638 .Jacques LeGoff

828,639 .Terry Bam Bam Gordy

828,640 . Bam Bam Bigelow

828,641 . Maurice Tillet(The French Angel)

828,642 .Judy Grable

828,643 .Helen Smith Hart

828,644 .Fritz Von Erich

828,645 .Klondike Bill

828,646 . Earthquake

828,647 .Enrique LLanes

828,648.Jack Tunney

828,649.Mike Awesome

828,650.Yinka Dare

828,651.Sarah Watt

[Rotten Ali 600]

Here's another big one... Over 700 pages and that's just about un fathomable.

 

http://www.rafinfo.o...oH-casstats.htm

 

2nd World War / RAF deaths come to 55,573.

 

828,627 to 884,199.

I've a feeling some of those aircrew will be duplicates of the names on Commonwealth war graves site I linked to previously.

 

In fact those two posts from the Commonwealth War Graves Commission are more search engines than lists. Together they added 780,182 names. Never mind, we are where we are.

[Rotten Ali 600]

And between posts 375 and 376 we lost 30,000 people due to a typing error...

 

828,652 to 858,651

[Rotten Ali 600]

Don't think the Titanic has been covered yet,

 

http://www.encyclopedia-titanica.org/titanic-passenger-list/

 

lists of the victims. 1514 souls

 

858,652 to 860,165

 

http://www.encyclopedia-titanica.org/titanic-survivors-list/

 

List of the survivors, another 710, all now dead.

 

860,166 to 860,995

[Dr. Zorders 1,271]

Don't think the Titanic has been covered yet,

 

http://www.encyclope...passenger-list/

 

lists of the victims. 1514 souls

 

858,652 to 860,165

 

http://www.encyclope...survivors-list/

 

List of the survivors, another 710, all now dead.

 

860,166 to 860,995

 

Um...... MPFC already listed "the posher victims of the Titanic"

 

so now you've just confused it even more!

[maryportfuncity 10,647]

Should we start this again disallowing the war dead as otherwise it's going to be over before it started?

 

Or start again with a 1 person per post limit?

 

NO!!!!

 

Just out of interest, I've checked and it would appear that the 200 most prolific posters (50 or more posts) have, between them, amassed a total of 172,038 posts. That's taken over 10 years.

 

Rough calculation: 17,200 posts per year equates to 86 posts per year per person; but, approximately three-quarters of those no longer post regularly, if at all.

 

So, if we say that there are 50 'active & prolific' users and they all post at the same average rate as the 200 have unto now, (roughly 86 posts/year) we'd achieve 4,301 posts in a year. Even if all the posts were in this thread, at one name per post it would take 232.5 years to reach a million.

 

Even maryport would struggle with that rate of output.

 

NB this is not a scientific hypothesis.

 

Yeah

[maryportfuncity 10,647]

Should we start this again disallowing the war dead as otherwise it's going to be over before it started?

 

Or start again with a 1 person per post limit?

 

NO!!!!

 

Just out of interest, I've checked and it would appear that the 200 most prolific posters (50 or more posts) have, between them, amassed a total of 172,038 posts. That's taken over 10 years.

 

Rough calculation: 17,200 posts per year equates to 86 posts per year per person; but, approximately three-quarters of those no longer post regularly, if at all.

 

So, if we say that there are 50 'active & prolific' users and they all post at the same average rate as the 200 have unto now, (roughly 86 posts/year) we'd achieve 4,301 posts in a year. Even if all the posts were in this thread, at one name per post it would take 232.5 years to reach a million.

 

Even maryport would struggle with that rate of output.

 

NB this is not a scientific hypothesis.

 

Yeah

 

But

[maryportfuncity 10,647]

Should we start this again disallowing the war dead as otherwise it's going to be over before it started?

 

Or start again with a 1 person per post limit?

 

NO!!!!

 

Just out of interest, I've checked and it would appear that the 200 most prolific posters (50 or more posts) have, between them, amassed a total of 172,038 posts. That's taken over 10 years.

 

Rough calculation: 17,200 posts per year equates to 86 posts per year per person; but, approximately three-quarters of those no longer post regularly, if at all.

 

So, if we say that there are 50 'active & prolific' users and they all post at the same average rate as the 200 have unto now, (roughly 86 posts/year) we'd achieve 4,301 posts in a year. Even if all the posts were in this thread, at one name per post it would take 232.5 years to reach a million.

 

Even maryport would struggle with that rate of output.

 

NB this is not a scientific hypothesis.

 

Yeah

 

But

 

I

[maryportfuncity 10,647]

Should we start this again disallowing the war dead as otherwise it's going to be over before it started?

 

Or start again with a 1 person per post limit?

 

NO!!!!

 

Just out of interest, I've checked and it would appear that the 200 most prolific posters (50 or more posts) have, between them, amassed a total of 172,038 posts. That's taken over 10 years.

 

Rough calculation: 17,200 posts per year equates to 86 posts per year per person; but, approximately three-quarters of those no longer post regularly, if at all.

 

So, if we say that there are 50 'active & prolific' users and they all post at the same average rate as the 200 have unto now, (roughly 86 posts/year) we'd achieve 4,301 posts in a year. Even if all the posts were in this thread, at one name per post it would take 232.5 years to reach a million.

 

Even maryport would struggle with that rate of output.

 

NB this is not a scientific hypothesis.

 

Yeah

 

But

 

I

 

Could

[maryportfuncity 10,647]

Should we start this again disallowing the war dead as otherwise it's going to be over before it started?

 

Or start again with a 1 person per post limit?

 

NO!!!!

 

Just out of interest, I've checked and it would appear that the 200 most prolific posters (50 or more posts) have, between them, amassed a total of 172,038 posts. That's taken over 10 years.

 

Rough calculation: 17,200 posts per year equates to 86 posts per year per person; but, approximately three-quarters of those no longer post regularly, if at all.

 

So, if we say that there are 50 'active & prolific' users and they all post at the same average rate as the 200 have unto now, (roughly 86 posts/year) we'd achieve 4,301 posts in a year. Even if all the posts were in this thread, at one name per post it would take 232.5 years to reach a million.

 

Even maryport would struggle with that rate of output.

 

NB this is not a scientific hypothesis.

 

Yeah

 

But

 

I

 

Could

 

Always

[maryportfuncity 10,647]

Should we start this again disallowing the war dead as otherwise it's going to be over before it started?

 

Or start again with a 1 person per post limit?

 

NO!!!!

 

Just out of interest, I've checked and it would appear that the 200 most prolific posters (50 or more posts) have, between them, amassed a total of 172,038 posts. That's taken over 10 years.

 

Rough calculation: 17,200 posts per year equates to 86 posts per year per person; but, approximately three-quarters of those no longer post regularly, if at all.

 

So, if we say that there are 50 'active & prolific' users and they all post at the same average rate as the 200 have unto now, (roughly 86 posts/year) we'd achieve 4,301 posts in a year. Even if all the posts were in this thread, at one name per post it would take 232.5 years to reach a million.

 

Even maryport would struggle with that rate of output.

 

NB this is not a scientific hypothesis.

 

Yeah

 

But

 

I

 

Could

 

Always

 

Modify

[maryportfuncity 10,647]

Should we start this again disallowing the war dead as otherwise it's going to be over before it started?

 

Or start again with a 1 person per post limit?

 

NO!!!!

 

Just out of interest, I've checked and it would appear that the 200 most prolific posters (50 or more posts) have, between them, amassed a total of 172,038 posts. That's taken over 10 years.

 

Rough calculation: 17,200 posts per year equates to 86 posts per year per person; but, approximately three-quarters of those no longer post regularly, if at all.

 

So, if we say that there are 50 'active & prolific' users and they all post at the same average rate as the 200 have unto now, (roughly 86 posts/year) we'd achieve 4,301 posts in a year. Even if all the posts were in this thread, at one name per post it would take 232.5 years to reach a million.

 

Even maryport would struggle with that rate of output.

 

NB this is not a scientific hypothesis.

 

Yeah

 

But

 

I

 

Could

 

Always

 

Modify

 

my

[maryportfuncity 10,647]

Should we start this again disallowing the war dead as otherwise it's going to be over before it started?

 

Or start again with a 1 person per post limit?

 

NO!!!!

 

Just out of interest, I've checked and it would appear that the 200 most prolific posters (50 or more posts) have, between them, amassed a total of 172,038 posts. That's taken over 10 years.

 

Rough calculation: 17,200 posts per year equates to 86 posts per year per person; but, approximately three-quarters of those no longer post regularly, if at all.

 

So, if we say that there are 50 'active & prolific' users and they all post at the same average rate as the 200 have unto now, (roughly 86 posts/year) we'd achieve 4,301 posts in a year. Even if all the posts were in this thread, at one name per post it would take 232.5 years to reach a million.

 

Even maryport would struggle with that rate of output.

 

NB this is not a scientific hypothesis.

 

Yeah

 

But

 

I

 

Could

 

Always

 

Modify

 

my

 

technique!

[maryportfuncity 10,647]

858,653: Sir Jimmy Saville

[maryportfuncity 10,647]

Someone's already posted him! You must have misspelt his name on the search. It's Savile not Saville.

 

858,653. Hunter S. Thompson

 

Oh, shit, right then 858,654: Fatty Arbuckle

[Bibliogryphon 9,586]

888,656. Roy Plomley (which eight dead people would you most like to be on a desert island with?)

[Dr. Zorders 1,271]

888,656. Roy Plomley (which eight dead people would you most like to be on a desert island with?)

 

HAHA! Brilliant. Lucky I just finished a sip of coffee before I read that.