Toast 15,632 Posted August 21, 2015 The accuser was 14, so this is not a paedophile case. Yes, okay hebephilia if we want to get technical... Weren't most of Rolf's victims adolescents too? I don't see why we shouldn't be picky technical. There is a big difference between being sexually attracted to teenagers who are legally minors, and being sexually attracted to prepubescent children. We have words at our disposal that distinguish between the two, and it is a great pity that the word 'paedophilia' is so carelessly bandied about. Why should our rich language be rendered increasingly imprecise? 4 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sir Creep 7,055 Posted September 4, 2015 The accuser was 14, so this is not a paedophile case. Yes, okay hebephilia if we want to get technical... Weren't most of Rolf's victims adolescents too? I don't see why we shouldn't be picky technical. There is a big difference between being sexually attracted to teenagers who are legally minors, and being sexually attracted to prepubescent children. We have words at our disposal that distinguish between the two, and it is a great pity that the word 'paedophilia' is so carelessly bandied about. Why should our rich language be rendered increasingly imprecise? I don't mind going on the record here. I've always tended toward 'younger' women, my wife was 7 years my lesser (at 35) for instance. However let's not get carried away. I'm not talking about fahkin 12-yr olds here, but certainly 16-17 would have been my fancy, as I was 18 once too you know. Guess that made me a felonious peadophile in some eyes. Oh well. (As if). SirC Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
maryportfuncity 10,349 Posted September 4, 2015 The accuser was 14, so this is not a paedophile case.Yes, okay hebephilia if we want to get technical... Weren't most of Rolf's victims adolescents too? I don't see why we shouldn't be picky technical. There is a big difference between being sexually attracted to teenagers who are legally minors, and being sexually attracted to prepubescent children. We have words at our disposal that distinguish between the two, and it is a great pity that the word 'paedophilia' is so carelessly bandied about. Why should our rich language be rendered increasingly imprecise? I don't mind going on the record here. I've always tended toward 'younger' women, my wife was 7 years my lesser (at 35) for instance. However let's not get carried away. I'm not talking about fahkin 12-yr olds here, but certainly 16-17 would have been my fancy, as I was 18 once too you know. Guess that made me a felonious peadophile in some eyes. Oh well. (As if). SirC Aye, but to be fair, if a 23 year old finds themselves lusting after an octagenarian, there's nowt legally wrong with it? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Toast 15,632 Posted September 4, 2015 The accuser was 14, so this is not a paedophile case.Yes, okay hebephilia if we want to get technical... Weren't most of Rolf's victims adolescents too? I don't see why we shouldn't be picky technical. There is a big difference between being sexually attracted to teenagers who are legally minors, and being sexually attracted to prepubescent children. We have words at our disposal that distinguish between the two, and it is a great pity that the word 'paedophilia' is so carelessly bandied about. Why should our rich language be rendered increasingly imprecise? I don't mind going on the record here. I've always tended toward 'younger' women, my wife was 7 years my lesser (at 35) for instance. However let's not get carried away. I'm not talking about fahkin 12-yr olds here, but certainly 16-17 would have been my fancy, as I was 18 once too you know. Guess that made me a felonious peadophile in some eyes. Oh well. (As if). SirC It's absolutely natural for men to be attracted to young girls who have passed puberty. Once Mother Nature has given us the wherewithal to reproduce, she expects us to get on with it. Just because humans in some places have invented laws limiting the age at which they consider it acceptable, it doesn't make the instinct or desire unnatural or perverted. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Cat O'Falk 3,290 Posted September 4, 2015 The accuser was 14, so this is not a paedophile case.Yes, okay hebephilia if we want to get technical... Weren't most of Rolf's victims adolescents too? I don't see why we shouldn't be picky technical. There is a big difference between being sexually attracted to teenagers who are legally minors, and being sexually attracted to prepubescent children. We have words at our disposal that distinguish between the two, and it is a great pity that the word 'paedophilia' is so carelessly bandied about. Why should our rich language be rendered increasingly imprecise? I don't mind going on the record here. I've always tended toward 'younger' women, my wife was 7 years my lesser (at 35) for instance. However let's not get carried away. I'm not talking about fahkin 12-yr olds here, but certainly 16-17 would have been my fancy, as I was 18 once too you know. Guess that made me a felonious peadophile in some eyes. Oh well. (As if). SirC Aye, but to be fair, if a 23 year old finds themselves lusting after an octagenarian, there's nowt legally wrong with it? The Daily Mail would still be tempted to call the octogenarian a paedophile though. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Davey Jones' Locker 1,324 Posted December 7, 2015 Maggie's appealing (in the courts, that is!) http://www.abc.net.au/news/2015-12-07/actor-maggie-kirkpatrick-appeal-child-sexual-abuse-conviction/7007440 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Davey Jones' Locker 1,324 Posted December 8, 2015 Cleared! http://www.abc.net.au/news/2015-12-08/verdict-on-prisoner-star-maggie-kirkpatrick-wins-appeal/7008518 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
YoungWillz 20,293 Posted December 28, 2020 Reveals she is still suffering from post-traumatic stress disorder after wrongful conviction: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-9049155/Prisoner-star-Maggie-Kirkpatrick-suffers-PTSD-wrongful-conviction.html 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CoffinLodger 1,248 Posted December 28, 2020 1 hour ago, YoungWillz said: Reveals she is still suffering from post-traumatic stress disorder after wrongful conviction: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-9049155/Prisoner-star-Maggie-Kirkpatrick-suffers-PTSD-wrongful-conviction.html I am a huge fan of Prisoner Cell Block H but I am not such a fan of Maggie;'s since she slagged off the fan club and said we had no lives. https://www.newidea.com.au/maggie-kirkpatrick-tells-prisoner-fans-to-get-a-life We are her bread and butter.Without us Prisoner would never be the world wide success it has become.She should respect us more ! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CoffinLodger 1,248 Posted December 28, 2020 On 04/09/2015 at 18:07, Sir Cunto said: I don't mind going on the record here. I've always tended toward 'younger' women, my wife was 7 years my lesser (at 35) for instance. However let's not get carried away. I'm not talking about fahkin 12-yr olds here, but certainly 16-17 would have been my fancy, as I was 18 once too you know. Guess that made me a felonious peadophile in some eyes. Oh well. (As if). SirC Well my dad was 22 when he started dating my mum who was 16 at the time.They have now been happily married for 58 years and I am the product of it so make of that what you will ! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites