Jump to content

Leaderboard


Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 23/01/14 in Posts

  1. 3 points
    AIUI that young man rather fancies Sex & Drugs & Rock 'n Roll, so there are certainly possibilities there. That said, several musicians of a similar bend, now in their sixties and seventies, are still with us, so they're a dodgy bet. Nicked again, this time for drag racing and DUI. regards, Hein I tried drag racing once, but I'd always end up laddering my stockings
  2. 2 points
    Sad to see Dom Joly reduced to such lame gimmicks just to get himself in the papers. This so called Mr Christmas lives in the town next to me, and not only is he a cock, but, according to many of his neighbours and local townsfolk, he's an absolute fucking bullshitter as well, and has been trading off the back of this farce for many years. Mr Christmas, my arse - Mr Fucking Twat more like.
  3. 1 point
    awww the poor diddums
  4. 1 point
    Presumably the stress of accidentally leaving his kid behind while on holiday brought that on.....
  5. 1 point
    No condolence visits, no flowers. regards, Hein There's one consolation, now he's pushing up daisies Most gardeners spend time getting rid of daisies. I'll wager this one's not happy with pushing them up. I don't hear him complaining
  6. 1 point
    Sympathising with the offender? where do you get that from? EGN and I are clearly on the same wavelength, we remember how things actually were then. If I'd been groped by DLT or his ilk, I'd probably have done him some minor damage with an elbow or knee at the time. Job done. I wouldn't be running to the police about it in 2013, that's for sure.
  7. 1 point
    Might I suggest the misleading thread title be changed? As this has spiraled beyond simply Mr Savile, perhaps 'Nonce-sense' might be more appropriate? (It is my personal belief that Chris Morris should be referenced as often as possible.) In other news, I had a debate with a colleague today about DLT. Now, I am not saying he was blameless. A quick google reveals that some of the ccusations are quite serious, however, the stuff that seems to be making the news such as; Grinding his groin against a colleague during a smoochy song. Groping somebody's bottom Flicking a name badge attached to a busty security guard and commenting 'Securi-titty' Jiggling the breasts of a colleague as she read the news Seems to me, an 80's child, to be simply the way men carried on in the seventies/early eighties. Trying it on forcefully with women, slapping arses and jiggling boobs was rife in the eighties by my recollection. In fact, the 'Have you had your boobs weighed' proto-meme was doing the rounds when I was in high school in the mid 90's. By modern standards of course his behaviour was unacceptable, however, if we consider that he did this around a time when Benny Hill more or less glorified such actions on a prime time TV show as 'comedic', how can we now lambast them as 'criminal' and 'shocking'. Be in no doubt, the Sexual Offences Act 1956 DOES cover what he has done, and does categorise it as 'indecent assault', however, by the same token the 'bums rush' beloved of Rugby fans around the time was an offence of 'Indecent Exposure' under the Vagrancy act of 1824 and vintage football chants such as 'you're going home in a fucking ambulance' are similarly illegal under the Offences Against the Persons Act of 1861. They were accepted as part of life, and thus never charged. The example I gave to my colleague was this; as a Scotsman, I am routinely referred to as a 'Sweaty sock' by English colleagues. This causes no offence to me, coming as it does from harmless cockney rhyming slang for 'Jock'. However, lets say that over the next few years an event occurs which renders the use of that term pejorative on a level with the 'N word'. Under the Public Order Act 1986, the use of threatening or abusive words or behaviour is an offence. Should I therefore be able to complain that I was once called a sweaty sock, as the term is now pejorative? Of course not. Its fine to say it now, and people should be judged by the standards of their time. I'm not excusing the actions of DLT, but it is society's fault, not his, that this behaviour was so prevalent as to not draw comment at the time. We cannot apply new legislation retrospectively, so we should not try to apply more stringent application of old legislation retrospectively. If you are still in doubt, have a look at the last time you so a seventies comedy show on TV. Almost none of them are re-run because by modern standards they are racist, sexist and discriminatory in a way that modern audiences would find appalling. I don't see the producers of those shows being dragged before the BBC's professional standards committee and asked to account for them, as they were simply 'of their time'.
  8. 1 point
    Like father, like son... Just now, my lad of eight years has said he wants to enter a team for next year. Without pront he has picked the Queen's husband, the oldest most famous person still alive to suffer a heart attack (Maureen O'Hara), Nelson Mandela, Count Duku (Christopher Lee), the oldest Dr Who (Tom Baker), the old James Bond (Sean Connery) and the oldest world racing champion (Jack Brabham). Not bad for starters. He is working on what to call his team. No doubt it will be something on a different level. School Year Deadpool = 1/7
  • Newsletter

    Want to keep up to date with all our latest news and information?

    Sign Up
×

Important Information

Your use of this forum is subject to our Terms of Use