maryportfuncity 10,645 Posted July 7, 2022 Three songs taken off streaming because - they may not be him: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-62068017 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
gcreptile 10,966 Posted July 7, 2022 21 minutes ago, maryportfuncity said: Three songs taken off streaming because - they may not be him: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-62068017 Oh, and they were on one of his posthumous albums. Can you sue if you bought them assuming it was a "Michael Jackson" product? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
maryportfuncity 10,645 Posted July 7, 2022 43 minutes ago, gcreptile said: Oh, and they were on one of his posthumous albums. Can you sue if you bought them assuming it was a "Michael Jackson" product? Actually a really good question and - technically - yes. If it was knowingly missold it's criminal, at least under the laws of the UK. Seriously doubt anyone will, if there is legal action it'd be one big operation vs another, Spotify vs Sony for example. But the value in these little celebrated tracks might be hard to prove. The one thing I think is nailed on is the unavailability of anyone there at the time to confirm, deny whether they used a sound-a-like. Nobody will want to have been responsible, if they find someone who was, that person is likely unable to escape the evidence trail and was probably ordered by someone higher who can escape it. All a very Michael Jackson state of affairs, then. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
En Passant 3,741 Posted July 7, 2022 2 hours ago, maryportfuncity said: If it was knowingly missold it's smooth criminal 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TQR 14,386 Posted January 4 In a major, major shock, he was named in the Epstein documents, joining (so far) Prince Andrew, Bill Clinton and David Copperfield. 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Old Crem 3,583 Posted January 4 8 hours ago, TQR said: In a major, major shock, he was named in the Epstein documents, joining (so far) Prince Andrew, Bill Clinton and David Copperfield. Did Epstein provide boys then? Can’t imagine him only wanting girls. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TQR 14,386 Posted January 4 8 minutes ago, The Old Crem said: Did Epstein provide boys then? Can’t imagine him only wanting girls. Nah, nothing of the sort. Harry and Meghan just set him up. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
maryportfuncity 10,645 Posted September 21 Abuse claims revived and a reputable rag is claiming that - might briefly get lively again in Jackoworld Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Comped 526 Posted September 21 5 hours ago, maryportfuncity said: Abuse claims revived and a reputable rag is claiming that - might briefly get lively again in Jackoworld So he wants a few hundred million more... Probably won't hold up in court even if the claims of abuse are true. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
maryportfuncity 10,645 Posted September 21 5 hours ago, Comped said: So he wants a few hundred million more... Probably won't hold up in court even if the claims of abuse are true. Aye but maybe the real hope is a payout from his still sizeable estate Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
