Chris Langham

[maryportfuncity 10,646]

Anubis; how many times do I have to warn people? Fish, barrels and guns are an inadvisable combination. You stand more chance of landing bullets in your own feet than hitting the fish and the water splashes everywhere. Electricity, a couple of seconds and you've got genocide in that circumstance, you know it makes sense.

[maryportfuncity 10,646]

JUST BECAUSE U LOOK AT CHILD PORN DONT MAKE U A PEDOPHILE.ITS LIKE IF U LOK AT DEAD BODIES PEOPLE CALL U A MURDERER! ITS DUMB

 

Just because you've managed to place a few attempts at words on this forum doesn't make you intelligent, witty or informed.

 

If I were you, I'd run before you're ripped apart by a Jackal.

[Dr Hackenslash 25]

JUST BECAUSE U LOOK AT CHILD PORN DONT MAKE U A PEDOPHILE.ITS LIKE IF U LOK AT DEAD BODIES PEOPLE CALL U A MURDERER! ITS DUMB!

 

*waves at Chris Morris's script-writer*

[Guest Guest]

JUST BECAUSE U LOOK AT CHILD PORN DONT MAKE U A PEDOPHILE.ITS LIKE IF U LOK AT DEAD BODIES PEOPLE CALL U A MURDERER! ITS DUMB!

 

Absolutely correct. Most paedophiles have images of child pornography, which is hardly a surprise. Most people found with such images are not. They are equally likely to have images of revolting adult porn, because their problem is an addiction or compulsion to download pornography and/or other disturbing images from the internet, with or without (yes, really - without!) a need to masturbate.

 

Millions of people looked at images of planes slamming into buildings on 9/11. It doesn't make them terrorists or terrorist sympathisers, or complicit in the creation of that dreadful act.

 

And viewing child porn does NOT differ from that in any way.

 

The idea that looking at images, most of them created 40 years ago when it was legal (?!) in Denmark, makes child abuse happen, is magical thinking. Along the lines of every time you say you don't believe in fairies, a fairy dies.

 

There is not a multi-million internet trade in child porn. Most of it is viewed free of charge, posted by idiots whose motives can only be guessed at. And is then viewed by very sad individuals, a few of whom may be paedophiles. But most are not.

 

The police, social workers, charities, psychs and probation officers have constructed a massive job creation programme around this particular panic. The tabloids lap it up. So far, more than 30 innocent people have topped themselves. Thousands of people, children included, have had their lives ruined. Who said that if there was a 'million to one chance' of saving a child, it would be 'worth it'? Shame on you.

 

Child abuse is utterly shocking and those who perpetrate it should serve long sentences. Those who witness it should not be judged on the basis of mindless assumptions.

[Guest Guest]

What a pile of crap. You're obviously a moron.

[Guest Guest]

What a pile of crap. You're obviously a moron.

 

Thanks for your constructive contribution. If that's as good as it gets, I despair. This is a serious issue which deserves serious debate and a thoughtful response that protects both children and the victims of a mindless witchhunt.

 

At the moment, children continue to be abused. The police and their allies are stupid, corrupt and much prefer soundbites and cheap busts to intelligent action, such as action which would prevent abuse.

 

If you don't believe me, just wait for the news over the next few months. Then we'll see who's the moron.

[maryportfuncity 10,646]

JUST BECAUSE U LOOK AT CHILD PORN DONT MAKE U A PEDOPHILE.ITS LIKE IF U LOK AT DEAD BODIES PEOPLE CALL U A MURDERER! ITS DUMB!

 

Absolutely correct. Most paedophiles have images of child pornography, which is hardly a surprise. Most people found with such images are not. They are equally likely to have images of revolting adult porn, because their problem is an addiction or compulsion to download pornography and/or other disturbing images from the internet, with or without (yes, really - without!) a need to masturbate.

 

Millions of people looked at images of planes slamming into buildings on 9/11. It doesn't make them terrorists or terrorist sympathisers, or complicit in the creation of that dreadful act.

 

And viewing child porn does NOT differ from that in any way.

 

The idea that looking at images, most of them created 40 years ago when it was legal (?!) in Denmark, makes child abuse happen, is magical thinking. Along the lines of every time you say you don't believe in fairies, a fairy dies.

 

There is not a multi-million internet trade in child porn. Most of it is viewed free of charge, posted by idiots whose motives can only be guessed at. And is then viewed by very sad individuals, a few of whom may be paedophiles. But most are not.

 

The police, social workers, charities, psychs and probation officers have constructed a massive job creation programme around this particular panic. The tabloids lap it up. So far, more than 30 innocent people have topped themselves. Thousands of people, children included, have had their lives ruined. Who said that if there was a 'million to one chance' of saving a child, it would be 'worth it'? Shame on you.

 

Child abuse is utterly shocking and those who perpetrate it should serve long sentences. Those who witness it should not be judged on the basis of mindless assumptions.

 

 

Now here's a little irony, I'm surfing this thread listening to The Who's gig on Radio 2 last night, Townsend slamming away as I read someone attempting an erudite investigation of child porn. Can't say I'm well enough informed to know either way but I'm highly suspicious of that claim that a fair chunk of the images are 40 or more years old when it was legal in Denmark. Does anyone else hereabouts have a clue about this?

[Dr Hackenslash 25]

Section 234 of the Danish Criminal Code (1969), reads whoever 'sells indecent pictures or objects to a person under 16 years of age' is to be punished by a fine. Section 235 (1980) has a special provision concerning the reproduction and sale of child pornography, that is, sexually explicit photographs of persons who appear to be under 15 years (the taking of such pictures was always a criminal offence).

 

This means that, in Denmark, any kind of pornography, except child pornography, can be produced and sold, or shown in cinemas, to persons who are 16 years or older. It does not mean that there can be pornography everywhere; thus, police regulations forbid the public display of pornography, for instance in porn shop windows, or to send or hand out pornography to someone who has not asked for it.

[Harvester Of Souls 40]

Nonces should be slowly, publically, tortured and executed.

[CarolAnn 926]

Nonces should be slowly, publically, tortured and executed.

 

Come to Texas. It should soon be law here.

[Harvester Of Souls 40]

The law has nothing to do with it. Good old fashion paedo-womping justice.

[maryportfuncity 10,646]

Nonces should be slowly, publically, tortured and executed.

 

Come to Texas. It should soon be law here.

 

CarolAnn, I read yer post a time or two and still don't know how far you're joking and how far it's true. Could you - like - clear this up, mebbe with a posted link?

[CarolAnn 926]

Nonces should be slowly, publically, tortured and executed.

 

Come to Texas. It should soon be law here.

 

CarolAnn, I read yer post a time or two and still don't know how far you're joking and how far it's true. Could you - like - clear this up, mebbe with a posted link?

 

I'm serious.

 

The provisions of Jessica's Law are:

• Mandatory 25 year to life sentences for a first-time violent sexual offense against a child under age 14
  
• Lifetime GPS monitoring for child sex offenders
  
• Death penalty sentence for a second sexually violent offense against a child under age 14
  
• Doubling the statute of limitations on sex crimes against children from 10 to 20 years
  
• Tougher penalties for those who harbor a sex offender who is in violation of registration requirements
  

http://www.dewhurst.org/site/PageServer?pa...as_Law_Petition

http://www.jmlfoundation.com/

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jessica%27s_Law

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jessica_Lunsford_Act

 

It's a big issue in a lot of elections, particularly in California, Texas and Florida (where Jessica lived). Our Lieutenant Governor is basing his campaign on it and he has the support of all the law enforcement organizations in the state, which is a definite plus to getting re-elected.

[Six 23]

What a pile of crap. You're obviously a moron.

 

Thanks for your constructive contribution. If that's as good as it gets, I despair. This is a serious issue which deserves serious debate and a thoughtful response that protects both children and the victims of a mindless witchhunt.

 

At the moment, children continue to be abused. The police and their allies are stupid, corrupt and much prefer soundbites and cheap busts to intelligent action, such as action which would prevent abuse.

 

If you don't believe me, just wait for the news over the next few months. Then we'll see who's the moron.

 

I am that guest... I haven't checked here for a few days so I didn't realise I had not logged in when I wrote that ' pile of crap ' post. I can not even be bothered to argue with the other ' guest ' on this point. I do think that if you like to look at images of child porn, then you are a paedophile. I can't imagine why anyone would like to see such images for any other reason. Argue all you want, 'Guest', it's your call.

[M.Lawrenson 11]

I'm sure that everyone knows, despite the tabloid hate-mongering and rabble-rousing about paedophiles, that the vast majority of sexual abuse of children is carried out (1) within the family (2) by an immediate adult male relative or someone close to the family (3) and, very sadly, is never actually reported.

[Godot 149]

What a pile of crap. You're obviously a moron.

 

Thanks for your constructive contribution. If that's as good as it gets, I despair. This is a serious issue which deserves serious debate and a thoughtful response that protects both children and the victims of a mindless witchhunt.

 

At the moment, children continue to be abused. The police and their allies are stupid, corrupt and much prefer soundbites and cheap busts to intelligent action, such as action which would prevent abuse.

 

If you don't believe me, just wait for the news over the next few months. Then we'll see who's the moron.

 

I am that guest... I haven't checked here for a few days so I didn't realise I had not logged in when I wrote that ' pile of crap ' post. I can not even be bothered to argue with the other ' guest ' on this point. I do think that if you like to look at images of child porn, then you are a paedophile. I can't imagine why anyone would like to see such images for any other reason. Argue all you want, 'Guest', it's your call.

 

I agree with you Six. My difficulty is working out what is child porn. Is any image of a naked child pornography? Or is it the experience of some sexual gratification from looking at a picture that defines pornography?

 

One of my favourite photographers is Frank Meadow Sutcliffe who worked in Whitby during the late 19th century. Perhaps his most famous photograph is one called the "Water rats" of carefully posed naked boys playing in the harbour. King Edward VII had an enlargement made to hang in Marlborough House. Even at the time Sutcliffe was villified by local clergy for what they saw as his corrupting influence.

 

Today I reckon he would have been locked up along with Edward VII. Maybe I too would be a candidate for censure because I would happily have the picture on my walls. I can enjoy the beauty of a child's body but that has nothing to do with sex. Unfortunately I'm not sure that our society makes - or is prepared to risk making - any distinction any more. I love children but as a man I would be very cautious about playing with any or photographing any in a way that would have been natural once. Men (strangers not known to parents) are no longer trusted around children. That's a fact of modern life.

[Anubis the Jackal 77]

Good job Bill Wyman left the Rolling Stones, he'd never get out of Texas alive.

The provisions of Jessica's Law are:

• Mandatory 25 year to life sentences for a first-time violent sexual offense against a child under age 14
  
• Lifetime GPS monitoring for child sex offenders
  
• Death penalty sentence for a second sexually violent offense against a child under age 14
  
• Doubling the statute of limitations on sex crimes against children from 10 to 20 years
  
• Tougher penalties for those who harbor a sex offender who is in violation of registration requirements
  

[Harvester Of Souls 40]

I'm sure that everyone knows, despite the tabloid hate-mongering and rabble-rousing about paedophiles, that the vast majority of sexual abuse of children is carried out (1) within the family (2) by an immediate adult male relative or someone close to the family (3) and, very sadly, is never actually reported.

Yep and it still warrants capital punishment.

[Tempus Fugit 214]

I'm sure that everyone knows, despite the tabloid hate-mongering and rabble-rousing about paedophiles, that the vast majority of sexual abuse of children is carried out (1) within the family (2) by an immediate adult male relative or someone close to the family (3) and, very sadly, is never actually reported.

Yep and it still warrants capital punishment.

lower case say i, with an occasional Capital for certain offenders.

[maryportfuncity 10,646]

I'm sure that everyone knows, despite the tabloid hate-mongering and rabble-rousing about paedophiles, that the vast majority of sexual abuse of children is carried out (1) within the family (2) by an immediate adult male relative or someone close to the family (3) and, very sadly, is never actually reported.

 

 

We've a link on another thread that provides some insight into the potential long term effects. Assuming her dad isn't in total denial he might cop the sickening 'consent' defence that some - like Gary Glitter - have been known to try.

[Harvester Of Souls 40]

Okay as long as the law on burning at the stake is repealed.

[millwall32 114]

At the further points of his social circle he has acquired the nickname Chris the Bacon (Bacon and Bonce rhymes with ....). Can anyone tell me what Bacon and Bonce means? It is doing my head in.

[Guest guest]

Nonces should be slowly, publically, tortured and executed.

 

And if these 'nonces' are the victims and product of their own childhood sexual abuse?

[Olveres 8]

Nonces should be slowly, publically, tortured and executed.

 

And if these 'nonces' are the victims and product of their own childhood sexual abuse?

 

We'll spare them the execution bit

[Youth in Asia 1,087]

I'm sure that everyone knows, despite the tabloid hate-mongering and rabble-rousing about paedophiles, that the vast majority of sexual abuse of children is carried out (1) within the family (2) by an immediate adult male relative or someone close to the family (3) and, very sadly, is never actually reported.

Yep and it still warrants capital punishment.

 

 

Witches - burn them

 

Communists - destroy their lives

 

People who download 7 naked pictures of 13-15 year olds from the internet - kill them (preferably slowly)

 

 

 

 

I wonder which lucky group of people is next ...

 

 

 

 

taxi drivers - hack off their genitals

 

liberal democrats - remove their hair

 

tabloid journalists - stamp on their toes then roast them on a spit