En Passant 3,755 Posted December 9 14 minutes ago, ladyfiona said: "good, make sure they go back within the month" but with a racist undertone Feargal Sharkey would like a word, he doesn't think that's an Undertone. *To my knowledge no group was ever named 'The Fucking Blatants' but I suppose it's possible. 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Old Crem 3,629 Posted December 9 4 hours ago, Thatcher said: 9.30am, Radio 4 - Pat McFadden, Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster, states it ‘should be a relatively swift decision’ to change the proscribed status of the HTS rebel group in Syria. 5.00pm, ITV - Prime Minister states no decision is pending at all on this and we shouldn’t get ahead of ourselves. In other news, Foreign Secretary on his feet in the Commons talking about an increase in asylum claims from Syria due to the the present circumstances. Meanwhile, Home Office simultaneously announces that they have suspended all Syrian asylum claims. So pleased to have adults back in charge with clear joined up communications. I honestly think Labour might well win less seats in 2029 then the Tories won in July. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Clorox Bleachman 2,478 Posted December 9 10 minutes ago, The Old Crem said: I honestly think Labour might well win less seats in 2029 then the Tories won in July. Why are you so obsessed with 2029, Crem? Regardless of your political opinions, there are so many productive ways you can get involved in politics that don't involve wishing for 5 years to pass as quickly as possible. It's sooner than you think. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Toast 16,232 Posted December 9 1 hour ago, The Old Crem said: I honestly think Labour might well win less seats in 2029 then the Tories won in July. What do you think dishonestly? And it's not 'less', it's 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
prussianblue 1,067 Posted December 10 12 hours ago, Clorox Bleachman said: Why are you so obsessed with 2029, Crem? Regardless of your political opinions, there are so many productive ways you can get involved in politics that don't involve wishing for 5 years to pass as quickly as possible. It's sooner than you think. Because he's wanking himself into a coma at the prospect of a Farage government with 600 seats or summat. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
En Passant 3,755 Posted December 10 12 hours ago, Toast said: What do you think dishonestly? And it's not 'less', it's I may have said it before but whilst I can be a right pain in the arse about grammar when it suits me, my attitude towards this particular error has softened ever since I remembered there's no such distinction between countable and uncountable when it's in reference to a greater amount not a lesser - it's just more in either case. That's plainly nonsensical logically if not grammatically. It still grates though, I guess I'm a traditionalist in these things. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Toast 16,232 Posted December 10 1 hour ago, En Passant said: I may have said it before but whilst I can be a right pain in the arse about grammar when it suits me, my attitude towards this particular error has softened ever since I remembered there's no such distinction between countable and uncountable when it's in reference to a greater amount not a lesser - it's just more in either case. That's plainly nonsensical logically if not grammatically. It still grates though, I guess I'm a traditionalist in these things. Can't pass up an opportunity to use a Stannis meme though. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Old Crem 3,629 Posted December 13 I will be amazed if Ed Miliband is still a cabinet Minster this time next year. It’s clear many on the frontbench want him gone. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
msc 18,536 Posted December 13 You thought Ed Davey was doomed in January tbf! 3 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
prussianblue 1,067 Posted Sunday at 18:43 The covetous cunts in Jerusalem are opportunistically grabbing Syrian land now. They just do whatever they want. Kill as many as you like, steal as much as you can, you'll get a free pass because you're the 'Chosen Ones' and/or the evils done to you 70+ years ago have to be paid for with the blood and land of the Arabs, for some reason. 5 1 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Old Crem 3,629 Posted Monday at 12:42 His biggest problem might be the Daily Mail was hinting suggesting he might be a friend of Charlie. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Old Crem 3,629 Posted Tuesday at 09:07 Does nobody at N.10 read the papers. Starmer is losing popularity every single day because he is never at home and he is still going on trips. They honestly make the Tories look competent. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Toast 16,232 Posted Tuesday at 14:42 5 hours ago, The Old Crem said: Does nobody at N.10 read the papers. Starmer is losing popularity every single day because he is never at home and he is still going on trips. They honestly make the Tories look competent. Good to hear they're honest though. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
prussianblue 1,067 Posted Tuesday at 15:11 27 minutes ago, Toast said: Good to hear they're honest though. 'Don't believe everything you read' never had much mileage in the Crem household. 1 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Bibliogryphon 9,645 Posted Tuesday at 16:12 7 hours ago, The Old Crem said: Does nobody at N.10 read the papers. Starmer is losing popularity every single day because he is never at home and he is still going on trips. They honestly make the Tories look competent. The only thing that is keeping Starmer in my 'good' books is the sheer vitriol with which the right wing press are going for him and his team. The papers that have spent the last 14 years spinning the lies that came out of Conservative Central office now Want you to believe the country is going to the dogs because someone to the left of Herman Goring is in 10 Downing Street. Honesty is his biggest problem. He is identifying a problem and trying to fix it. He doesn't get all the calls right but I will judge him by where he finishes his term not where he starts it 3 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sod's Law 471 Posted Tuesday at 22:00 5 hours ago, Bibliogryphon said: The only thing that is keeping Starmer in my 'good' books is the sheer vitriol with which the right wing press are going for him and his team. The papers that have spent the last 14 years spinning the lies that came out of Conservative Central office now Want you to believe the country is going to the dogs because someone to the left of Herman Goring is in 10 Downing Street. Honesty is his biggest problem. He is identifying a problem and trying to fix it. He doesn't get all the calls right but I will judge him by where he finishes his term not where he starts it Communication has been his biggest problem so far. He's reasonably competent so far compared with what we had before, but he's clearly not a natural communicator and struggles with his PR. It's good to be honest with people about the extent of the problems and what needs to be done to put the country back on track, but he needs to be better at showing the public the light at the end of the tunnel and what it looks like, give them a more detailed sense of the long term vision, especially when certain sections of the population are being asked to make sacrifices. As things stand, he doesn't have a good shield against the 'incumbent syndrome' suffered by every world leader these days: any bad thing that happens in his term will be blamed on him, even if it's not his fault. More charismatic leaders tend to be more skilled at deflecting blame for everything. 4 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Old Crem 3,629 Posted Tuesday at 22:22 22 minutes ago, Sod's Law said: Communication has been his biggest problem so far. He's reasonably competent so far compared with what we had before, but he's clearly not a natural communicator and struggles with his PR. It's good to be honest with people about the extent of the problems and what needs to be done to put the country back on track, but he needs to be better at showing the public the light at the end of the tunnel and what it looks like, give them a more detailed sense of the long term vision, especially when certain sections of the population are being asked to make sacrifices. As things stand, he doesn't have a good shield against the 'incumbent syndrome' suffered by every world leader these days: any bad thing that happens in his term will be blamed on him, even if it's not his fault. More charismatic leaders tend to be more skilled at deflecting blame for everything. Which is unusual for a barrister. Barristers tend to be natural communicators but he is not really that. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
prussianblue 1,067 Posted Tuesday at 23:58 1 hour ago, The Old Crem said: Which is unusual for a barrister. Barristers tend to be natural communicators but he is not really that. Loath as I am to agree with you, I do think Sir Keir Starmer KC, former DPP, has been surprisingly bad at presenting the case for his government and its policies. For a laugh I looked up the required skills to be a barrister on the National Careers Service website. How many of these do we think he's demonstrated as PM? 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Old Crem 3,629 Posted yesterday at 10:11 The Daily Mirror has turned on Labour with a hostile headline about WASPI women decision. Not often the Daily Mail and Mirror have the same negative headline but for very different reasons . Share this post Link to post Share on other sites