Dia de los Muertos

Nah, @windsor is a c*nt.

I was re reading my post to see where was it that I tried to impose restrictions upon you. I apologised for getting the wrong end of the stick there, didn't I? I'm only saying that forums have rules. Don't give people shit, don't modify their posts, don't call them a cunt. If I saw someone else getting this crap, I would personally feel for them and try to help out, not tell them that they are "crying into our Coco Pops because Angry from Tunbridge Wells called us a nasty name". But hey, that's just me.

I knew you'd see sense in the end... I mean I am a complete loser and big words are very hard for me... thank you for understanding You're on ignore, remember? Please stop stoking the fire Lard, I am ignoring him because I want to stop him from bullying me, and thanks to you quoting him I have to read all his insults! He's already referred to my "massive cunt", I'd rather not read what else he's revealing about me. He's evidently a child who knows cock all about cock all anyway, and I have other things to do with my time. With respect, you've just apologised to him so how is that me 'stoking the fire'? Whilst I absolutely respect your right to put someone on 'ignore', why should everyone else stop quoting or responding to someone else just because they've tweaked your nipples a bit too hard? You're kidding, right? I never apologised, he modified my post, like I just now modified his post (above). I wasn't aware of it until you quoted him, therefore the "stoking the fire". OK fine, I see bullying is alive and well on the Deathlist. I did miss this place, and now I wonder why Uh, you're kidding, right? Bullying? Well, thick as I am, I did not know he had modified your post, so no, I was not 'stoking the fire'. I think you're being a bit sensitive. Sorry, I didn't mean you! I left the board two years ago because of Windsor. Decided to return, but blocked him. Didn't insult him, just blocked him. Now I see he's been calling me a "massive cunt", modifying my posts so they appear to say that I'm apologising... and I have to put up with all that crap just because some little kid can't take it if not everybody wants to play with him. Meanwhile I'm the one whose being called names and having her posts modified. So I ask: blocking someone is acceptable behaviour within a form. Calling someone a cunt and changing their posts - is that acceptable?

I knew you'd see sense in the end... I mean I am a complete loser and big words are very hard for me... thank you for understanding You're on ignore, remember? Please stop stoking the fire Lard, I am ignoring him because I want to stop him from bullying me, and thanks to you quoting him I have to read all his insults! He's already referred to my "massive cunt", I'd rather not read what else he's revealing about me. He's evidently a child who knows cock all about cock all anyway, and I have other things to do with my time. With respect, you've just apologised to him so how is that me 'stoking the fire'? Whilst I absolutely respect your right to put someone on 'ignore', why should everyone else stop quoting or responding to someone else just because they've tweaked your nipples a bit too hard? You're kidding, right? I never apologised, he modified my post, like I just now modified his post (above). I wasn't aware of it until you quoted him, therefore the "stoking the fire". OK fine, I see bullying is alive and well on the Deathlist. I did miss this place, and now I wonder why

I knew you'd see sense in the end... You're on ignore, remember? Please stop stoking the fire Lard, I am ignoring him because I want to stop him from bullying me, and thanks to you quoting him I have to read all his insults! He's already referred to my "massive cunt", I'd rather not read what else he's revealing about me. He's evidently a child who knows cock all about cock all anyway, and I have other things to do with my time.

Alternatively you can fuck off, you massive cunt. Obviously I hadn't seen the post above. Is this acceptable behaviour in the Deathlist? I'd like the opinion of the mods, please.

Interesting. I also prefer Peter Gabriel's Genesis, though some of the Phil Collins stuff I do like. Three Sides Live is one of my favourite Genesis albums actually. I think he was way too over exposed in later years, and working with Disney did NOT help his cause. Anybody seen the South Park episode in which they take the mickey out of him? It's ruthless! In any case, I actually went to see Genesis in Twickenham (was it two years ago?), and even though it didn't rate amongst my favourite gigs, Phil Collins vocals were amongst the best I ever heard. Very, very impressive. He does seem awfully bitter, bless him he doesn't seem to understand why he is not in the same league as Led Zeppelin and Pink Floyd.

I had a bottle in the fridge for over two years and then gave up and drank it. I now bought one of those small bottles (20cl), which barely takes any space. In any case, tell the Mrs it won't be long now

Hi BS44, whilst I agree that there should be more love in the world (and my hatred of the milk snatcher doesn't help), I don't see my signature quote as being about love but rather about (organised) religion. I do think here should be rather less of that in the world. Couldn't agree more!

LOL - so two years of suspecting everyone from Bruce Willis to Richard Dean Anderson and it ends up being the one person I never thought of... To add insult to injury, according to his Wiki page (which makes no mention of this little "habit") he has been dating super-beautiful Sophie Marceau since 2007: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christopher_L...t#Personal_life I wonder if she knows about his sideline interest... How can a guy like that also win over such a gorgeous woman who could have any bloke she wanted? Maybe it was a one off or a phase? Maybe it's something that he only does when he is on the other side of the world? Maybe Sophie Marceau is into transvestites as well? Ah, posibilities are endless!

Hey GRIM UP NORTH, you can find out how to do all those things here: Deathlist Howto. Davey Jones' Locker: how frustrating, I know exactly what you mean. Remember when Diana was holidaying with the Fayeds and came out to the reporters on a boat and said to them that she would make a revelation in two weeks that would blow them all away? And then she goes and dies! I'm still wondering what that was, damn!

That's all very well and good but are you going to answer our question in the Jerry Lewis thread, Dia? http://www.deathlist.net/forums/index.php?...st&p=159760 Thanks to Windsor pissing you off, we have been waiting two years for your answer! LOL, I had forgotten about that. The answer is now in the Jerry Lewis thread, and it's not one of the names that had been mentioned so might come as a surprise

Mr T? Lee Majors? T J Hooker? I'm right, aren't I? Hey Dia, now that you are back, perhaps you can finally answer this question and tell us who it is! Come on, we've been anxiously awaiting the revelation of the celebrity's identity for over two years! OK, it was Christopher Lambert!

LOL I got sent this today, check it out (got to love the Irish )

Hi CarolAnn :-) That's a good point. I'll tell you: the people only knew what they were being told by the government controlled media. This was before the time of the Internet, and with the censorship that was taking place, we actually thought we were winning... until we lost. The military government was subsidised by the American government like the one in Chile and it is currently believed that they fully expected the Americans to take their side (I know, I know). In any case, the junta was on its way out, and what better way to drum up support than a war? Plus, it's what a military government likes doing, going to war .