Spade_Cooley 9,637 Posted 6 hours ago Considering they're going to have to find a lot of new names for the 2025 DL, have absolutely zero objection to the committee shoving Chuckie in the low 30s. 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
msc 18,543 Posted 6 hours ago 7 minutes ago, The Old Crem said: Palace say they optimistic. Sounds like One doesn’t want to be on the 2025 list to me A relatively optimistic Crem post? I think I'm going to faint from shock! My view - they put Julie Walters on this years list just in case her news turned bad, they can do that for the bloody King. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Immortal 644 Posted 6 hours ago 18 minutes ago, gcreptile said: It must be a terminal, but (so far) manageble kind of cancer. Chronic leukemia, bladder cancer, or prostate cancer. Pretty sure someone on here shared some inside info they received that it's bladder cancer but not clear on the stage. If it's stage 3 bladder cancer I unfortunately have a pretty good idea in how it's likely going to play out (My grandfather died from it, it was a year and a half from diagnosis to death.) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mango 195 Posted 6 hours ago 1 hour ago, gcreptile said: It must be a terminal, but (so far) manageble kind of cancer. Chronic leukemia, bladder cancer, or prostate cancer. There's no indication it "must be" that. Carter had "terminal" cancer and survived. Per The Times: Quote Announcing a return to public duties, the King is pictured arm-in-arm with the Queen on a sunlit stroll through the gardens at Buckingham Palace. The messaging is clear: he’s (nearly) out of the woods. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DCI Frank Burnside 3,891 Posted 5 hours ago 1 hour ago, gcreptile said: It must be a terminal, but (so far) manageble kind of cancer. Chronic leukemia, bladder cancer, or prostate cancer. Would tend to agree. Could be a few years yet but would still think he might be worth a slot lower down the list 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Old Crem 3,633 Posted 4 hours ago 23 minutes ago, DCI Frank Burnside said: Would tend to agree. Could be a few years yet but would still think he might be worth a slot lower down the list I imagine that they wouldn’t leak words such as optimism if they think death is coming in the next few months. Ditto it also probably means they would also slowly prepare people for his death as it gets nearer but without making a big announcement that it is terminal. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sly Ronnie 917 Posted 4 hours ago Maybe this guy may not be too far away in his prediction.. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ulitzer95 12,853 Posted 4 hours ago 6 minutes ago, Sly Ronnie said: Maybe this guy may not be too far away in his prediction.. I thought this was already debunked as fake/edited? I've seen several versions now. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DCI Frank Burnside 3,891 Posted 4 hours ago 29 minutes ago, The Old Crem said: I imagine that they wouldn’t leak words such as optimism if they think death is coming in the next few months. Ditto it also probably means they would also slowly prepare people for his death as it gets nearer but without making a big announcement that it is terminal. Would agree unlikey in the next 12 months. Complications etc.. is the only reason it might happen in the next 12 months 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Surprise Demise 78 Posted 3 hours ago 37 minutes ago, Ulitzer95 said: I thought this was already debunked as fake/edited? I've seen several versions now. I'd imagine it's a case of someone writing hundreds of tweets saying "The queen dies on xxx date" and simply removing all but the correct one once she'd actually died. I've seen the same thing happen before with a YouTube channel which "predicted" the death of major celebrities: the videos only gained traction after the celebrities had died: once all the videos with incorrect dates had been removed. It's a very weird thing to do to try to gain notoriety for yourself, but people eat it up... 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sly Ronnie 917 Posted 3 hours ago 1 hour ago, Ulitzer95 said: I thought this was already debunked as fake/edited? I've seen several versions now. No doubt that the first date was a fiddle but the second one still stands... 26 minutes ago, Surprise Demise said: I'd imagine it's a case of someone writing hundreds of tweets saying "The queen dies on xxx date" and simply removing all but the correct one once she'd actually died. I've seen the same thing happen before with a YouTube channel which "predicted" the death of major celebrities: the videos only gained traction after the celebrities had died: once all the videos with incorrect dates had been removed. It's a very weird thing to do to try to gain notoriety for yourself, but people eat it up... Yes I've seen those with the celebs still alive, no doubt waiting for their retrospective date changing. They're dreadful! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
