Godot 149 Posted December 3, 2005 Robert Robinson must be the dullest TV entertainer ever. Worse than Richard Whiteley or Russell Harty. He must have almost bored himself to death by now. He would be top of my "living dead" list. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Windsor 2,230 Posted December 3, 2005 Lets just calm down with all the new threads. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Tempus Fugit 214 Posted December 3, 2005 Robert Robinson must be the dullest TV entertainer ever. Worse than Richard Whitely or Russell Harty. He must have almost bored himself to death by now.He would be top of my "living dead" list. Right below Joseph Juran. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Godot 149 Posted December 3, 2005 Sorry. It's just that some of the old threads were crap. What relevance is there in discussing footballers like Wayne Rooney or polling on George best now he's dead? He's not going to die soon. Don't be precious Windsor Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Harvester Of Souls 40 Posted December 3, 2005 Sorry. It's just that some of the old threads were crap. What relevance is there in discussing footballers like Wayne Rooney or polling on George best now he's dead? He's not going to die soon. Don't be precious Windsor Huzzah again! Welcome Sir. I like the cut of your jib already! Gladiator I salute you Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BrunoBrimley 86 Posted December 3, 2005 Don't be precious Windsor Windsor can't help being Precious, and if you don't like it then do the mashed potato on out the door........and what is wrong with being precious anyway? You sound jealous godot. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Cowboy Ronnie 78 Posted December 3, 2005 whilst this is rapidly becoming another one of DL's specialist discussions about nothing, I do agree with Godot's observations about crap threads, and have enjoyed his contributions thus far. I'd insert a lame joke here about "waiting" for his next post, but someone's probably already made that one. And Windsor will always be precious, which is just part of his charm. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Tempus Fugit 214 Posted December 3, 2005 Robert Robinson must be the dullest TV entertainer ever. Worse than Richard Whitely or Russell Harty. He must have almost bored himself to death by now.He would be top of my "living dead" list. To be serious for a minute, I think on dullness Robert Robinson is beaten hands down by Phil Drabble, who incidentally is 92 in '06. A quote from Drabble's Wiki page: "He took few holidays, travelled abroad only a couple of times, and was proud to have never lived more than 20 miles from his place of birth." And if you ever had the misfortune, to have had to sit through an entire episode of "One man and his dog", You'll know what an eternity feels like. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
maryportfuncity 10,584 Posted December 3, 2005 We could always cut down on thread numbers by merging this thread with the one dedicated to the dullness in a suit that is Cliff Mitchelmore. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
millwall32 114 Posted December 4, 2005 Lets just calm down with all the new threads. Why exactly? Surely a bad thread will just drift down the Forum and be forgotten. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lady Die 63 Posted December 4, 2005 How about a few suggestions of dull people .... Jeremy Paxman springs to mind. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
millwall32 114 Posted December 4, 2005 Lets just calm down with all the new threads. Why exactly? Surely a bad thread will just drift down the Forum and be forgotten. I cite this lot as evidence. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Harvester Of Souls 40 Posted December 4, 2005 I cite this lot as evidence. Why not merge everything into one thread? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
maryportfuncity 10,584 Posted December 4, 2005 This lot might be short but there's some quality ideas bobbing about inside 'em. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Canadian Paul 97 Posted December 4, 2005 Maybe if we had a "Random Thoughts" thread we could avoid people starting new threads on whatever comes to mind. Then again, the suggestions for 2006 thread doesn't seem to be stemming the tide of people starting new person-specific threads whenever they want to suggest someone. Then again, threads are what give forums their character. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Clive's NOT Dunn 7 Posted December 5, 2005 Robert Robinson must be the dullest TV entertainer ever. Worse than Richard Whitely or Russell Harty. He must have almost bored himself to death by now.He would be top of my "living dead" list. To be serious for a minute, I think on dullness Robert Robinson is beaten hands down by Phil Drabble, who incidentally is 92 in '06. A quote from Drabble's Wiki page: "He took few holidays, travelled abroad only a couple of times, and was proud to have never lived more than 20 miles from his place of birth." And if you ever had the misfortune, to have had to sit through an entire episode of "One man and his dog", You'll know what an eternity feels like. I can't let that pass. OMAHD was the height of excitement. The outrun, the drive and as for the shedding ring well... What could be better entertainment than watching old men whistling at sheep. You need to stay in more. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Godot 149 Posted December 5, 2005 Look I wasn't saying they were all crap threads, just some of them. I don't waste my time on rubbish sites but I think this one has a certain style, so much so I have spent most of my off time this weekend creating my own "50" list for 2006. So far I have 51. I shouldn't have created so many new threads but I became obsessed and manic so went away. I think Valerie Singleton, by the way, is a good candidate for the living dead. I never liked her lipstick. Also, I don't want to stir things as a newcomer but there is a discernible clique on this site and cliques should always be resisted. I suppose that's stirring things. Sorry. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BrunoBrimley 86 Posted December 5, 2005 Also, I don't want to stir things as a newcomer but there is a discernible clique on this site and cliques should always be resisted. I suppose that's stirring things. Sorry. well just click away and you too can be part of a clique not really a clique thing going around here go-dot its more a matter of how you present humor seems to go a good distance here but theres also the matter of people getting to know you getting to know all about you Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Godot 149 Posted December 5, 2005 I'm Godot. My favourite film is Lawrence of Arabia, favourite book is Catch 22, favourite animal is the great crested newt and that's about all there is to know apart from the obvious.... that Godot never comes Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Clive's NOT Dunn 7 Posted December 5, 2005 Look I wasn't saying they were all crap threads, just some of them. I don't waste my time on rubbish sites but I think this one has a certain style, so much so I have spent most of my off time this weekend creating my own "50" list for 2006. So far I have 51. I shouldn't have created so many new threads but I became obsessed and manic so went away. I think Valerie Singleton, by the way, is a good candidate for the living dead. I never liked her lipstick. Also, I don't want to stir things as a newcomer but there is a discernible clique on this site and cliques should always be resisted. I suppose that's stirring things. Sorry. Welcome Godot, I joined for much the same reason. I know what you mean with regard the clique, it's similar feeling to when I first joined the Garrick back in '22. Stick with it though, they are a witty and diverse bunch. And remember people are dying to get on here. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Godot 149 Posted December 5, 2005 I have a theory that to be named here, particularly among the living dead, should be considered quite an honour. At least it means that someone is thinking about them. Simon Dee, for instance has been in the LD for years and probably has quite some time to go. As does Peter Purves. It would be awful if you were to just pass on, like Peter Glaze (crackerjack) for example, without anyone noticing. What was the point of Peter Glaze? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lady Die 63 Posted December 5, 2005 .... Peter Glaze (crackerjack) ..... CRACKERJACK! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Canadian Paul 97 Posted December 5, 2005 I never noticed any cliques... I just sit here and rant about death and, to distinguish myself from the guests, I try to make a rational point or two. Obviously the people who know each other longer are more warm to each other of course, but I wouldn't call that a clique. I keep meaning to watch Lawrence of Arabia, but never get the chance. Heard good things though. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Tempus Fugit 214 Posted December 5, 2005 I have a theory that to be named here, particularly among the living dead, should be considered quite an honour. At least it means that someone is thinking about them. Simon Dee, for instance has been in the LD for years and probably has quite some time to go. As does Peter Purves. It would be awful if you were to just pass on, like Peter Glaze (crackerjack) for example, without anyone noticing. What was the point of Peter Glaze? I agree, better to be remembered somewhere, than totally ignored. Would Bernie Clifton be a good example of the living dead. He's been doing that stupid man riding a bird act for decades. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
maryportfuncity 10,584 Posted December 5, 2005 What was the point of Peter Glaze? To make the others look talented. Crackerjack - 400 editions, that's gotta be worth summat hasn't it? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites