JR976evil 902 Posted August 5 8 minutes ago, gcreptile said: I'd say that nobody needs a Gladiator II or a misguided Napoleon biography. I hear you, nobody forces me to watch them. But I kind of think it reflects back badly on the originals, like the later Indiana Jones movies. Sometimes things are better off being left alone, and Ridley Scott doesn't bring anything new to the table anymore. I admit that's a bit elitist. I did quite like House of Gucci and All The Money In The World Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Bibliogryphon 9,412 Posted August 6 9 hours ago, gcreptile said: I'd say that nobody needs a Gladiator II or a misguided Napoleon biography. I hear you, nobody forces me to watch them. But I kind of think it reflects back badly on the originals, like the later Indiana Jones movies. Sometimes things are better off being left alone, and Ridley Scott doesn't bring anything new to the table anymore. I admit that's a bit elitist. It is a pity Ridley Scott can't retire retrospectively. Ideally before he made 1492 and Prometheus Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
