BonScott 122 Posted March 13 Just now, Ulitzer95 said: Anyone else read her reaction statement the other day and think “that’s not her”? Continually absent, always rumoured ill. I think she’s in a worse state than most ppl care to imagine. Doesn’t she have Type 1 diabetes? someone in my local association mentioned it to me a while back, you will be more informed than me, if so that will be very disruptive to her life Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ulitzer95 11,972 Posted March 13 Just now, BonScott said: Doesn’t she have Type 1 diabetes? someone in my local association mentioned it to me a while back, you will be more informed than me, if so that will be very disruptive to her life Perhaps but I’m not referring to that. The Lab ppl I know say she’s got something like Parkinson’s. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sean 6,195 Posted March 13 43 minutes ago, Ulitzer95 said: Anyone else read her reaction statement the other day and think “that’s not her”? Continually absent, always rumoured ill. I think she’s in a worse state than most ppl care to imagine. She looked OK in the commons earlier I thought but if your people say parkinsons I'm inclined to believe them based on your history of inside knowledge. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Thatcher 2,256 Posted March 13 She once went apeshit at me and a bunch of staffers to get out a lift because the division bells were ringing. We were all going the same way, moody cow. She definitely has a condition. 1 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ulitzer95 11,972 Posted March 13 19 minutes ago, Sean said: She looked OK in the commons earlier I thought but if your people say parkinsons I'm inclined to believe them based on your history of inside knowledge. Don't quote me on Parkinson's. None of them seem to know for sure. They all implied it's some kind of terminal but slow degenerative thing, and one said "maybe Parkinson's". You can live for a few years with these things, you can live for 15 years with them. It's not worth the risk of putting her on DL. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sean 6,195 Posted March 13 23 minutes ago, Thatcher said: She once went apeshit at me and a bunch of staffers to get out a lift because the division bells were ringing. We were all going the same way, moody cow. She definitely has a condition. Could just mean she is a stuck up entitled arrogant narcissist with delusions of grandeur.Which we all knew already 1 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Comped 477 Posted March 14 2 hours ago, Ulitzer95 said: Don't quote me on Parkinson's. None of them seem to know for sure. They all implied it's some kind of terminal but slow degenerative thing, and one said "maybe Parkinson's". You can live for a few years with these things, you can live for 15 years with them. It's not worth the risk of putting her on DL. Alzheimer's or dementia perhaps? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Summer in Transylvania 2,009 Posted March 14 2 minutes ago, Comped said: Alzheimer's or dementia perhaps? No, she's just like that usually. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ulitzer95 11,972 Posted March 14 9 minutes ago, Comped said: Alzheimer's or dementia perhaps? No. She's been having "episodes" in private. Whatever it is it's neurological. I spoke to an MP tonight after the above conversation and he said "I heard Parkinsons too". Whatever it is, she seemed to speak fine within the chamber the other day, so perhaps she has good and bad days. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
YoungWillz 20,688 Posted May 28 It's now coming out that the internal disciplinary process on her finished months ago. Questions now being raised about why a decision has not been made on re-admittance or otherwise to the Labour Party. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c8vv4ep92y8o Interesting sideshow to the Election, though I'm not sure CCHQ can make much of this. 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ulitzer95 11,972 Posted May 28 51 minutes ago, YoungWillz said: It's now coming out that the internal disciplinary process on her finished months ago. Questions now being raised about why a decision has not been made on re-admittance or otherwise to the Labour Party. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c8vv4ep92y8o Interesting sideshow to the Election, though I'm not sure CCHQ can make much of this. CCHQ? What do they have to do with her disciplinary? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
YoungWillz 20,688 Posted May 28 Just now, Ulitzer95 said: CCHQ? What do they have to do with her disciplinary? Nothing as you know - I just don't think it's a campaign talking point for Tories to beat the Labour Party over the head with. The culture wars and political process points aren't going to cut through imo. I think people want to hear what can make a difference to their lives, not politicians' lives. 3 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Old Crem 3,443 Posted May 28 Blocked from standing for Labour. Will she stand as independent- or even appear more in public so we can asses her health. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TQR 14,315 Posted May 28 46 minutes ago, The Old Crem said: Blocked from standing for Labour. Will she stand as independent- or even appear more in public so we can asses her health. No. She’ll stand because she wants to be an MP. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Old Crem 3,443 Posted May 28 2 minutes ago, TQR said: No. She’ll stand because she wants to be an MP. It’s not known if she will stand as independent. Many have speculated she won’t. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
maryportfuncity 10,470 Posted May 28 1 minute ago, TQR said: No. She’ll stand because she wants to be an MP. Yeah, she will - whatever the other reasons in the Labour decision you suspect it was discussed, but not written that their poll lead makes her and Jezza expendable and if they want to woo business that's a good look. She took over 70% of the votes in Hackney and Stoke Newington last time, what that'd mean if a Labour candidate chased them and she stood independently is probably too hard to call, the big curve ball being she's got to get out and show herself and that means form studying for the voters as well as us. Turns 70 in September, btw. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TQR 14,315 Posted May 28 Just now, maryportfuncity said: Yeah, she will - whatever the other reasons in the Labour decision you suspect it was discussed, but not written that their poll lead makes her and Jezza expendable and if they want to woo business that's a good look. She took over 70% of the votes in Hackney and Stoke Newington last time, what that'd mean if a Labour candidate chased them and she stood independently is probably too hard to call, the big curve ball being she's got to get out and show herself and that means form studying for the voters as well as us. Turns 70 in September, btw. Yeah, she’s one of those who, in her particular seat, has likely outgrown her party. I wouldn’t bank on her, or (unfortunately) Corbyn losing their seats. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
nantonian2013 49 Posted May 28 I'm sceptical she has as much of a personal vote in her constituency as Corbyn might. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
maryportfuncity 10,470 Posted May 28 17 minutes ago, nantonian2013 said: I'm sceptical she has as much of a personal vote in her constituency as Corbyn might. Aye, a genuinely hard to call seat - and Labour taking it would be a Portillo moment to some. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Comped 477 Posted May 28 Per ITV, she's had the Labour whip restored... 1 1 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TQR 14,315 Posted May 28 Oh well that’s that conversation rendered pointless then 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sean 6,195 Posted May 28 This is just incompetent messaging from Labour.Not that it will make a difference but still astounding. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sean 6,195 Posted May 28 I reckon Rayner fearing for her seat to The Workers Party threatened resignation to get Abbott back in to gain some credit with the left of Labour. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sean 6,195 Posted May 28 Although she could never say she did leaks are inevitable. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Old Crem 3,443 Posted May 28 13 minutes ago, Sean said: I reckon Rayner fearing for her seat to The Workers Party threatened resignation to get Abbott back in to gain some credit with the left of Labour. Rayner’s seat is only 10-12% Muslim. I can’t see her losing it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
