Leaderboard

I googled PBA as I'm an ignorant cunt, and it's the Philippine Basketball Association. So he's basically saying LFN is into Asian ladyboys.

Bringing a thick midget into the discussion does not reinforce the point you are making RA! What's Banshees Scream got to do with it?

Thank fuck for that then!! I thought it was something bad.

My posts don't require any "quality control" from DDT, thx muchly. What I choose to post to charon is my own fuckin business. And anyway if you really do like most of my posts why annoy me by deleting the few you don't, you silly fuck? Maybe you should be called DevonPowerTrip. No. What you choose to post to Charon becomes everyone else's business when its splattered all over a public forum and as such it will be subject to moderation. Unless he were to object, you are of course welcome to use the PM facility to send whatever abuse you like in his direction. Your very childish reaction to me deleting a few of your more immature posts is most disappointing. I don't appreciate being addressed as a "silly fuck" by anyone and certainly not by you. Nevertheless, as you erroneously consider that I am singling you out personally for censorship, I will rise above your comment and leave it on public view. In any case, I believe that your post says more about you than it does about me. Have a nice weekend.

Shut up. I could beat up your mum, sister and auntie with one hand. Largely because they're one and the same person you redneck

Todays result FORT WILLIAM 0 FRASERBURGH 6

Yes it was, it was an insult to all women out there, our mothers, sisters, aunties, grannies and Miranda Hart. Your behaviour is disgusting, its sexist and discriminatory to all cock sucking transvestites. You are a disgraceful spunk stain on this forum.

No, basically Lardy, he is saying that "someone with PBA" wouldnt raise a smile at my log in name. Looking deeper into this, as you have, I have also assumed that he must be refering to the female of the species. The only conclusion that can be drawn is that he views women with utter contempt and thinks that they are all a bunch of neurotic fuckwits. Well, If I were a woman, Id not stand there and take such an insult, Lardy, the c**t needs knacking!!!!!!!!! Me? Punch a man? I would and have never done such a thing.* And anyway I'm currently indisposed filling my face with Red Bull and Snack a Jacks, ensuring my stomach and liver are ready for a Smirnoff beating of epic proportions, while watching through the window as my mug lovely boyfriend washes my car. And actually he's probably right, most girls are fucking annoying. Especially that one in your avi, whoever the big titted spunk receptacle is. * This may not be factually accurate. Look, the only people allowed to say that women are annoying are women. He has, clearly, overstepped the mark, hasnt he. That girl in my avatar is a Russ Meyer legend!!! You jealous bitch!!! Jealous? What's she got that I haven't? I had to google who Russ Meyer is - basically a porn merchant then. Disgusting.

No, basically Lardy, he is saying that "someone with PBA" wouldnt raise a smile at my log in name. Looking deeper into this, as you have, I have also assumed that he must be refering to the female of the species. The only conclusion that can be drawn is that he views women with utter contempt and thinks that they are all a bunch of neurotic fuckwits. Well, If I were a woman, Id not stand there and take such an insult, Lardy, the c**t needs knacking!!!!!!!!! Me? Punch a man? I would and have never done such a thing.* And anyway I'm currently indisposed filling my face with Red Bull and Snack a Jacks, ensuring my stomach and liver are ready for a Smirnoff beating of epic proportions, while watching through the window as my mug lovely boyfriend washes my car. And actually he's probably right, most girls are fucking annoying. Especially that one in your avi, whoever the big titted spunk receptacle is. * This may not be factually accurate.

What?

'Pseudobulbar affect (PBA), emotional lability, labile affect or emotional incontinence refers to a neurologic disorder characterized by involuntary crying or uncontrollable episodes of crying and/or laughing, or other emotional displays' So basically LFN is a girl.

I hope not! I don't ban members. There's still time to ban your IP. Is this is a blanket policy, or will you make perceptions for specific cases of outrageous behaviour? Define 'outrageous behaviour'. Maybe he ought to start at defining perceptions as opposed to exceptions...

So people should get along, not because everyone getting along would create a harmonious atmosphere of peace and lovely lemon cupcakes, but because you don't think there attempts at abusing each-other are up to scratch? I suppose when your heroes are the Taliban you'd be disappointed by anything less than us blowing each-other up, probably? Couldn't agree more, let's see some quality abuse.

Kurt Cobain was found dead twenty years ago today aged 27... God, I feel old...

Bringing a thick midget into the discussion does not reinforce the point you are making RA!

Years? Doesn't belong in the 2014 thread then, does it. Nor does this Toastie but, to be fair, if the twathead guest had posted this link, which was on the same page, they would have had more cred!!! This is just utterly brilliant!!! http://www.dailymail...-make-rich.html LOL Mental! By the way, did they ever find that bloke's dick in Middlesbrough? Let's be honest, it's not fucking hard to find a dick in Middlesbrough.

What the actual fuck Jeez Dr, I wasn't aware of any hostilities, it is the internet ffs. Chill bro as they say

NO!!!! Just out of interest, I've checked and it would appear that the 200 most prolific posters (50 or more posts) have, between them, amassed a total of 172,038 posts. That's taken over 10 years. Rough calculation: 17,200 posts per year equates to 86 posts per year per person; but, approximately three-quarters of those no longer post regularly, if at all. So, if we say that there are 50 'active & prolific' users and they all post at the same average rate as the 200 have unto now, (roughly 86 posts/year) we'd achieve 4,301 posts in a year. Even if all the posts were in this thread, at one name per post it would take 232.5 years to reach a million. Even maryport would struggle with that rate of output. NB this is not a scientific hypothesis. Yeah But I Could Always Modify my technique!

NO!!!! Just out of interest, I've checked and it would appear that the 200 most prolific posters (50 or more posts) have, between them, amassed a total of 172,038 posts. That's taken over 10 years. Rough calculation: 17,200 posts per year equates to 86 posts per year per person; but, approximately three-quarters of those no longer post regularly, if at all. So, if we say that there are 50 'active & prolific' users and they all post at the same average rate as the 200 have unto now, (roughly 86 posts/year) we'd achieve 4,301 posts in a year. Even if all the posts were in this thread, at one name per post it would take 232.5 years to reach a million. Even maryport would struggle with that rate of output. NB this is not a scientific hypothesis. Yeah But I Could Always Modify my

NO!!!! Just out of interest, I've checked and it would appear that the 200 most prolific posters (50 or more posts) have, between them, amassed a total of 172,038 posts. That's taken over 10 years. Rough calculation: 17,200 posts per year equates to 86 posts per year per person; but, approximately three-quarters of those no longer post regularly, if at all. So, if we say that there are 50 'active & prolific' users and they all post at the same average rate as the 200 have unto now, (roughly 86 posts/year) we'd achieve 4,301 posts in a year. Even if all the posts were in this thread, at one name per post it would take 232.5 years to reach a million. Even maryport would struggle with that rate of output. NB this is not a scientific hypothesis. Yeah But I Could Always Modify

NO!!!! Just out of interest, I've checked and it would appear that the 200 most prolific posters (50 or more posts) have, between them, amassed a total of 172,038 posts. That's taken over 10 years. Rough calculation: 17,200 posts per year equates to 86 posts per year per person; but, approximately three-quarters of those no longer post regularly, if at all. So, if we say that there are 50 'active & prolific' users and they all post at the same average rate as the 200 have unto now, (roughly 86 posts/year) we'd achieve 4,301 posts in a year. Even if all the posts were in this thread, at one name per post it would take 232.5 years to reach a million. Even maryport would struggle with that rate of output. NB this is not a scientific hypothesis. Yeah But I Could Always

NO!!!! Just out of interest, I've checked and it would appear that the 200 most prolific posters (50 or more posts) have, between them, amassed a total of 172,038 posts. That's taken over 10 years. Rough calculation: 17,200 posts per year equates to 86 posts per year per person; but, approximately three-quarters of those no longer post regularly, if at all. So, if we say that there are 50 'active & prolific' users and they all post at the same average rate as the 200 have unto now, (roughly 86 posts/year) we'd achieve 4,301 posts in a year. Even if all the posts were in this thread, at one name per post it would take 232.5 years to reach a million. Even maryport would struggle with that rate of output. NB this is not a scientific hypothesis. Yeah But I Could

NO!!!! Just out of interest, I've checked and it would appear that the 200 most prolific posters (50 or more posts) have, between them, amassed a total of 172,038 posts. That's taken over 10 years. Rough calculation: 17,200 posts per year equates to 86 posts per year per person; but, approximately three-quarters of those no longer post regularly, if at all. So, if we say that there are 50 'active & prolific' users and they all post at the same average rate as the 200 have unto now, (roughly 86 posts/year) we'd achieve 4,301 posts in a year. Even if all the posts were in this thread, at one name per post it would take 232.5 years to reach a million. Even maryport would struggle with that rate of output. NB this is not a scientific hypothesis. Yeah But I

NO!!!! Just out of interest, I've checked and it would appear that the 200 most prolific posters (50 or more posts) have, between them, amassed a total of 172,038 posts. That's taken over 10 years. Rough calculation: 17,200 posts per year equates to 86 posts per year per person; but, approximately three-quarters of those no longer post regularly, if at all. So, if we say that there are 50 'active & prolific' users and they all post at the same average rate as the 200 have unto now, (roughly 86 posts/year) we'd achieve 4,301 posts in a year. Even if all the posts were in this thread, at one name per post it would take 232.5 years to reach a million. Even maryport would struggle with that rate of output. NB this is not a scientific hypothesis. Yeah But

NO!!!! Just out of interest, I've checked and it would appear that the 200 most prolific posters (50 or more posts) have, between them, amassed a total of 172,038 posts. That's taken over 10 years. Rough calculation: 17,200 posts per year equates to 86 posts per year per person; but, approximately three-quarters of those no longer post regularly, if at all. So, if we say that there are 50 'active & prolific' users and they all post at the same average rate as the 200 have unto now, (roughly 86 posts/year) we'd achieve 4,301 posts in a year. Even if all the posts were in this thread, at one name per post it would take 232.5 years to reach a million. Even maryport would struggle with that rate of output. NB this is not a scientific hypothesis. Yeah