friedbutty 41 Posted Tuesday at 14:26 13 minutes ago, gcreptile said: I mean, you can't be punished for a successful suicide.... The article says that if a law were to be passed, the first death would still be 2-3 years away. But I guess only very few people here believe she can make it to 2026. Which is better? That's No More Life or if she has the death needle, Esther Rat Poisoned? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Grim Up North 3,723 Posted Tuesday at 14:52 24 minutes ago, friedbutty said: Which is better? That's No More Life or if she has the death needle, Esther Rat Poisoned? Neither they are both shit. That’s Death is the only acceptable option using the KISS principles. 3 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Old Crem 3,576 Posted Tuesday at 16:02 Feels like she might die just after the assisted dying bill is rejected on the 29th November. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
An Fear Beag 1,532 Posted Tuesday at 16:02 1 hour ago, Grim Up North said: Neither they are both shit. That’s Death is the only acceptable option using the KISS principles. That's Life host is toast Using the principle that it's a whole year since it was used, and if it was shit enough to use then, it's shit enough to re-use now. 1 4 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Bibliogryphon 9,552 Posted Tuesday at 16:11 "This is nothing to do with me" I do feel she is betraying all those people she previously supported for the Silverline support network. I think this has the biggest potential for abuse and manipulation of older sick people. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Old Crem 3,576 Posted Tuesday at 16:26 21 minutes ago, Bibliogryphon said: "This is nothing to do with me" I do feel she is betraying all those people she previously supported for the Silverline support network. I think this has the biggest potential for abuse and manipulation of older sick people. She will never go through with it herself despite the majority of cancer suffers being able to commit suicide through certain methods till pretty close to the end, (Through because of high profileness her family would be more likely to be prosecuted than an ordinary person.) 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Bibliogryphon 9,552 Posted Tuesday at 16:33 3 minutes ago, The Old Crem said: I don’t know why she doesn’t just commit suicide. She is still presumably capable of taking enough pills to overdose by herself or another method of suicide. Here is where I will defend her. She may be capable of taking an overdose or another way of doing that but not everyone does have that ability and choice. It can also be difficult for people to obtain drugs to do this without being deceitful. What she is looking for is dignity in dying and protection for loved ones who have to provide assistance. However I still feel that there are risks in the approach being adopted 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Old Crem 3,576 Posted Tuesday at 16:43 11 minutes ago, Bibliogryphon said: Here is where I will defend her. She may be capable of taking an overdose or another way of doing that but not everyone does have that ability and choice. It can also be difficult for people to obtain drugs to do this without being deceitful. What she is looking for is dignity in dying and protection for loved ones who have to provide assistance. However I still feel that there are risks in the approach being adopted I fully get why but it feels so risky. Maybe a ban on Inheritance being accessible for three - five years could remove some of that issue throigh that would also be unfair as well. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ulitzer95 12,501 Posted Tuesday at 17:31 Cancer is normally a peaceful death. Horrible end of life experiences tend to come from things like Parkinson’s, motor neurone disease, Alzheimer’s etc. Esther just loves a bandwagon. If she wants it that bad she should go to Switzerland and be done with it. Even in her dying days she’s got to be a social justice warrior for something. 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sean 6,292 Posted yesterday at 12:15 18 hours ago, Ulitzer95 said: Cancer is normally a peaceful death. Horrible end of life experiences tend to come from things like Parkinson’s, motor neurone disease, Alzheimer’s etc. Esther just loves a bandwagon. If she wants it that bad she should go to Switzerland and be done with it. Even in her dying days she’s got to be a social justice warrior for something. Cancer can cause horrific deaths .Lung cancer is one of the worst ones to die from. 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ulitzer95 12,501 Posted yesterday at 12:20 4 minutes ago, Sean said: Cancer cab cause horrific deaths .Lung cancer is one of the worst ones to die from. The key word there being "can", but not usually. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sean 6,292 Posted yesterday at 12:28 5 minutes ago, Ulitzer95 said: The key word there being "can", but not usually. Lung cancer is usually extremely unpleasant in its final stages even with good palliative care.I agree that there are worse slower ways to die. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ulitzer95 12,501 Posted yesterday at 12:40 11 minutes ago, Sean said: Lung cancer is usually extremely unpleasant in its final stages even with good palliative care.I agree that there are worse slower ways to die. Just as well I quit smoking then! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Toast 16,096 Posted yesterday at 13:00 27 minutes ago, Sean said: Lung cancer is usually extremely unpleasant in its final stages even with good palliative care.I agree that there are worse slower ways to die. Even with palliative care there can be other stuff going on. My mum was sedated with morphine as usual on the last day of her life, and she was very distressed, thrashing about violently in her sleep. The nurse came and gave her another dose and she settled. It was a fatal dose - that happens all the time but nobody talks about it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ulitzer95 12,501 Posted yesterday at 13:08 4 minutes ago, Toast said: Even with palliative care there can be other stuff going on. My mum was sedated with morphine as usual on the last day of her life, and she was very distressed, thrashing about violently in her sleep. The nurse came and gave her another dose and she settled. It was a fatal dose - that happens all the time but nobody talks about it. The NHS also stop feeding people who they know are on their way out, even if they're still conscious. Also something that's never spoken about. A relative of mine went to see a friend in her mid-90s several weeks ago. She was frail but conscious and speaking as normal. Hospital were not feeding her properly. Every time she visited she brought her a decent meal and she'd perk up. They need the beds at the end of the day but I think it's really immoral. 5 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
friedbutty 41 Posted 6 hours ago On 12/11/2024 at 16:26, The Old Crem said: She will never go through with it herself despite the majority of cancer suffers being able to commit suicide through certain methods till pretty close to the end, (Through because of high profileness her family would be more likely to be prosecuted than an ordinary person.) Maybe that's her intention. She wants a more real life method of haunting them. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Master Obit 823 Posted 5 hours ago On 13/11/2024 at 13:08, Ulitzer95 said: The NHS also stop feeding people who they know are on their way out, even if they're still conscious. Also something that's never spoken about. A relative of mine went to see a friend in her mid-90s several weeks ago. She was frail but conscious and speaking as normal. Hospital were not feeding her properly. Every time she visited she brought her a decent meal and she'd perk up. They need the beds at the end of the day but I think it's really immoral. In fairness, at least some of the time it will be that the patients aren't eating it because hospital food is notoriously horrible. It isn't that they aren't being fed, it's that they aren't being fed anything that is appetising because it's quite difficult to make gourmet meals for hundreds of patients so everything tends to be quite simple and batch cooked. It's just not appetising at all, when I was in A&E last year and they took me to a ward I was more worried about finding a relative to bring me a decent meal than I was about whether there was anything wrong with me. The guy I'm currently speaking to works for the NHS, and assures me that the staff food isn't really any better. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lobius 30 Posted 5 hours ago On 13/11/2024 at 13:08, Ulitzer95 said: The NHS also stop feeding people who they know are on their way out, even if they're still conscious. Also something that's never spoken about. Often it's not that the food is bad - a part of end-of-life is the digestive system packing in so eating becomes painful, and appetite evaporates. https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/end-of-life-care/your-wellbeing/changes-in-the-last-hours-and-days/ Share this post Link to post Share on other sites