TLC 9 Posted March 23, 2007 I reckon I'd be a great moderator. I'd ban me for a start.... Sorry for tonight's posts, I'm drunk for the first time in about 3 months. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Tuber Mirum 125 Posted March 23, 2007 You people still looking for mods? I told the owner of the Royal Forums where to stick it and resigned the other day so I'm available. I'm a bit concerned you may lack the necessary loyalty. I don't think one of our mods has ever resigned. PS: Does this mean we are allowed to troll The Royal Forums (sic) again? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Entropy 5 Posted March 23, 2007 I don't mean to influence votes, but that would be the final straw for me (if you made her a moderator). Don't worry, I didn't mean it. Like I said a few posts back, I thought every day was a provoke-Windsor day, and it seems that I was successful. I'm not looking for another moderator assignment this soon after chucking the last one. And no, please, it doesn't mean you can go back to trolling over there. They're a good bunch of people, and they're not responsible for my inability to get along with the owner. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lady Grendel 139 Posted March 23, 2007 I still reckon you shouldn't have deleted the thread, Windsor's paranoid ramblings said far more about him than they said about you. What's this then? Provoke Windsor day? Get lost. And here's me thinking every day is provoke Windsor day. You people still looking for mods? I told the owner of the Royal Forums where to stick it and resigned the other day so I'm available. I hope you go back in and amend your profile so it reads 'gone to the dark side' and add a DL link Entropy. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Entropy 5 Posted March 24, 2007 Now there's a thought. I did go back there today and add a wolf avatar and a link to a wildlife organisation, but "gone to the dark side" does have a certain ring to it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Monoclinic 39 Posted March 24, 2007 I think it's very admirable that they are offering their services. By all accounts it seems a pretty thankless time consuming job cleaning up after all the links to spam porn (there could well be a niche market there, pictures of spam in the nude and so forth). I for one don't understand why some people are hankering over a job that will require you to endlessly tidy up and move things around. Could someone explain what the fuss is about over entering into modship, or is it just the youngsters who missed out on being milk monitor going me! me! me! Good on you, though by bringing more order to the site by cleaning up the diatribe and porn would in fact defy the second law of thermodynamics would it not, thereby decreasing the power of Entropy's mod status Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gunjaman5000 30 Posted March 24, 2007 I still reckon you shouldn't have deleted the thread, Windsor's paranoid ramblings said far more about him than they said about you. What's this then? Provoke Windsor day? Get lost. Didn't you start a thread claiming TH was deleting your posts and reading your PMs? How could reminding you of your poor behaviour be construed as provocation? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DevonDeathTrip 2,358 Posted March 24, 2007 If there are to be any more moderators, I would nominate, in the following order: 1) M. Lawrenson - I recall that he is not working at the moment. "Moderating Death List" would look good on a CV 2) Bald Rick - Just so spelling and punctuation could be kept in check, between 9 and 5 Monday to Friday (GMT) 3) Gunjaman5000 - We need someone else from the southern hemisphere to keep the spammers at bay during the night shift. (GMT) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Windsor 2,233 Posted March 24, 2007 If there are to be any more moderators, I would nominate, in the following order: 1) M. Lawrenson - Never here. 2) Bald Rick - Only diring work (I suspect) 3) Gunjaman5000 - Arsehole I nominate Lady Grendel, ie+, and Handrejka. I've spent the last week being told that females are more rational... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Tuber Mirum 125 Posted March 24, 2007 Seriously, I'd vote for Lawrenson. Or Entropy,of course. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
maryportfuncity 10,647 Posted March 24, 2007 Seriously, I'd vote for Lawrenson. Or Entropy,of course. Agreed, Lawro is never less than good value. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Handrejka 1,904 Posted March 25, 2007 If there are to be any more moderators, I would nominate, in the following order: 1) M. Lawrenson - Never here. 2) Bald Rick - Only diring work (I suspect) 3) Gunjaman5000 - Arsehole I nominate Lady Grendel, ie+, and Handrejka. I've spent the last week being told that females are more rational... Thanks W it's nice to be nominated but I don't think I'd be a good mod. I second ie and Lady G though and I also think Captain Oates would be a good mod. I also think DDT seems like a fair chap. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gunjaman5000 30 Posted March 25, 2007 I don't mean to influence votes, but that would be the final straw for me (if you made her a moderator). Or Entropy,of course. Now you're talking!!! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Entropy 5 Posted March 25, 2007 Apparently it's still Provoke-Windsor Day. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Windsor 2,233 Posted March 25, 2007 Only because these people have nothing better to do in their sad little lives. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
honez 79 Posted March 25, 2007 Only because these people have nothing better to do in their sad little lives. Why not think of them as deferring important things in their lives, just to devote some time to pissing you off? Surely you've got to feel good about them caring enough to want to piss you off that much? Take some pride in it. Relish the thought that they're probably going to get told off about wasting so much time on their computer. Take solace in the fact that their relationships are probably going downhill, just because they want to goad you one more time. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Real Madron 6 Posted March 25, 2007 so this went from Too Many Moderators to Who Shall We Nominate As a Moderator? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Windsor 2,233 Posted March 25, 2007 so this went from Too Many Moderators to Who Shall We Nominate As a Moderator? It certainly would appear so. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Canadian Paul 97 Posted March 25, 2007 Apparently it's still Provoke-Windsor Day. That seems to be every day around here lately - I went to an old thread to grab something and noticed that M. Busby's signature makes reference to Windsor the Troll being Ian Huntley's bitch, or something along those lines - and he hasn't been on since early January! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Windsor 2,233 Posted March 25, 2007 Apparently it's still Provoke-Windsor Day. That seems to be every day around here lately - I went to an old thread to grab something and noticed that M. Busby's signature makes reference to Windsor the Troll being Ian Huntley's bitch, or something along those lines - and he hasn't been on since early January! I insist that some Mod change that. I hadn't noticed that. After all this, perhaps AttJ would like to explain why I am the only one who gets continual warnings for provoking people. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Ruggles of Red Gap Posted March 25, 2007 If I nominate myself for this worthless position will it necessiate registering here? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Four Horsemen 26 Posted March 25, 2007 Yes, and improving spelling as well. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Anubis the Jackal 77 Posted March 25, 2007 Maybe because you continually provoke people? Just a thought. After all this, perhaps AttJ would like to explain why I am the only one who gets continual warnings for provoking people. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Windsor 2,233 Posted March 25, 2007 Maybe because you continually provoke people? Just a thought. After all this, perhaps AttJ would like to explain why I am the only one who gets continual warnings for provoking people. You go out of your way to provoke me. If I say black, you say white. Why is it always you who messes with my warning scale? Never anyone else unless I actually do something wrong. In short, I think you have it in for me. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Anubis the Jackal 77 Posted March 25, 2007 What first attracted me to this forum was witty, pithy, sometimes articulate, sometimes moronic banter; not needless drivel about who said what to whom, what was said, and could someone please stop that member doing all those horrible things to me. You're not unique in annoying me, but you annoy me uniquely. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites