Drunk? Bored?? Psychopath???

[Lard Bazaar 3,799]

1 hour ago, Lord Fellatio Nelson said:

How about we just give Deathers a provisional licence to come back  here and have his posts reviewed before they are allowed on?

It is getting a bit fucking ridiculous that he keeps coming back and keeps getting banned fer chrissakes.

 We are currently rammed with shit posters, posters that need to be cattle prodded out of here and others that, despite their longevity on here ( no, I won't name them, you know who they are) are so bone crushingly boring you would choose to be hung rather than stuck in a lift with them.

The mods seem to have no appetite to throw out the shit so the rest of us have to endure them, Coffin Lodger being a prime example.

I'm sure we can block Deathers from sending us PMs or we can just ignore and delete them.

Yes, he is a complete prat but a reasonably intelligent and entertaining one.

I have not heard anybody say that he should be kept away, if anybody does feel that way then, perhaps, they would like to grow a pair and go on record with their views on why he should be on a ban for life or summat.

I agree with some of what you say but there’s nothing intelligent and entertaining about sending completely unprovoked private messages calling someone a cunt. I don’t care if he’s banned or not, but where do you draw the line on ‘the rules’? If they’re not going to be enforced you may as well have none and let everyone say and do whatever they want. 

[Lord Fellatio Nelson 6,218]

14 minutes ago, Lard Bazaar said:

I agree with some of what you say but there’s nothing intelligent and entertaining about sending completely unprovoked private messages calling someone a cunt. I don’t care if he’s banned or not, but where do you draw the line on ‘the rules’? If they’re not going to be enforced you may as well have none and let everyone say and do whatever they want. 

Like I said, he is a prat, Lardy.

He has sent me a load of shit before, I just deleted it.

Zorders sent me far worse and, such is the utter shit people are posting on here, I almost wish he was back posting.

What Deathsperm contributed to the forum, as opposed to him sending shite in PMs, is what I was on about.

Yes, I hear what you are saying, he had loads of chances, kept getting let back in and kept fucking it up, fair enough.

Thing is, there must be some sort of 'off' button for those that don't want his PMs and, if he becomes a boil on the arse he just gets banned for two months at a time.

He can still be monitored, have his posts approved before they get put on here and, I'm fairly sure, we can block him from sending PMs to us too.

He acted like a child, he gets treated like one, perhaps?

 

[Toast 16,129]

1 hour ago, Lard Bazaar said:

I agree with some of what you say but there’s nothing intelligent and entertaining about sending completely unprovoked private messages calling someone a cunt. I don’t care if he’s banned or not, but where do you draw the line on ‘the rules’? If they’re not going to be enforced you may as well have none and let everyone say and do whatever they want. 

 

There's no rule here forbidding calling someone a cunt, is there?  If there is, we're all in trouble. 

[Lard Bazaar 3,799]

Just now, Toast said:

 

There's no rule here forbidding calling someone a cunt, is there?  If there is, we're all in trouble. 

No, there isn’t.  But you took that phrase out of the context of the sentence it was in i.e. ‘sending completely unprovoked messages calling someone a cunt’ is completely different to simply calling someone a cunt in the course of a forum exchange.  And my point was if you don’t enforce a ban for an infringement of ‘the rules’ (because he must have broken a ‘rule’ to have been banned in the first place, surely?) then don’t bother having ‘rules’. 

[TQR 14,384]

12 minutes ago, Lard Bazaar said:

if you don’t enforce a ban for an infringement of ‘the rules’ (because he must have broken a ‘rule’ to have been banned in the first place, surely?) then don’t bother having ‘rules’. 

His ban was initially for sending (not very good) porn gifs via PM to loads of people. So simply take away his ability to do that - restrict PM privileges and/or block the attachment upload function, with mod preview thrown in for good measure. That’s what I’d do, given that several people have expressed their wish for him to be allowed back.

[Sir Creep 7,070]

If someone is bent out of shape for being called a cunt, they're on the wrong website.  That goes for any derogatory name really.  

[gcreptile 10,963]

CoffinLodger's posts are quite enjoyable after a bottle of sparkling wine.

[Sir Creep 7,070]

The Groundhog saw his shadow today, meaning another six weeks of stupid ass posts from YoungWillz.

[Paul Bearer 6,100]

4 hours ago, Sir Creep said:

The Groundhog saw his shadow today, meaning another six weeks of stupid ass posts from YoungWillz.

Does that mean another 6 weeks of stupid ass posts from you too? 

[TQR 14,384]

4 hours ago, Sir Creep said:

The Groundhog saw his shadow today, meaning another six weeks of stupid ass posts from YoungWillz.

This site has already had six years of undiluted shite from both of you.

[Sir Creep 7,070]

On 22/01/2006 at 17:16, Guest **** ******* said:

*** ***** ******* ****** ********* ******** ******* ****** ***** ****

O'Sullivan!

 

The brilliance of this post cannot be overstated.  Every single part of it.  

[Sir Creep 7,070]

Did arghton start up another DP today?  There's still time.

[arghton 6,695]

42 minutes ago, Sir Creep said:

Did arghton start up another DP today?  There's still time.

Good idea!

[AngryLazarus 9]

On 01/05/2021 at 11:17, Salmon Mousse said:

'The Caine Mutiny' actress, May Wynn, died back on March 22, aged 93

 

There's  a thread for actresses, dumbass.

 

On 01/05/2021 at 15:28, arghton said:

https://unframed.lacma.org/2021/02/23/memoriam-howard-smith

Howard Smith (1928-2021), American-born Finnish designer and artist died in February. He was sent by CIA to Finland in 1964 and became one of the most known artists in the country.

Here are some birds designed by Smith:

 

There's a thread for artists, dumbass.

 

On 02/05/2021 at 01:18, Captain Hemlock said:

Not really sure where to put this one as he was a sports team owner, but Byron "B.J." Seaman (whose name could have made for a hilarious DDP obit) dead at 97

 

https://www.espn.com/nhl/story/_/id/31360331/byron-seaman-founding-owner-calgary-flames-dies-97

 

There's a thread for sportspeople dumbass. (and for ice hockey as well i think, double dumbass)

 

On 02/05/2021 at 21:18, Alex said:

Former NASCAR driver Eric McClure dies at 42

https://sports.yahoo.com/former-nascar-driver-eric-mc-clure-dies-at-42-173157050.html

 

There's a thread for motorsports, dumbass.

 

On 03/05/2021 at 19:21, arghton said:

The founder of Jeune Afrique Béchir Ben Yahmed, dead at 93 from covid.

https://www.theafricareport.com/84784/bechir-ben-yahmed-founder-of-jeune-afrique-has-passed-away/

I linked a Jeune Afrique article in the Bouteflika thread a couple of days ago.

 

There's a thread for journalists, dumbass. 

Edited May 4, 2021 by DevonDeathTrip
There is also a thread for drunken nutters, which is where I'm moving this effort.

[Toast 16,129]

 

[msc 18,436]

Genuinely spent an hour watching a BBC4 doc on a frail old artist thinking "this is a good tip, Beeb" only to Wiki them and find out they died last year and I never noticed!

[TQR 14,384]

I’ll play ‘bored’, please.

 

I do enjoy sometimes looking at the ‘who’s online’ list, for the sole fact that some of the things guests look at is hilariously random.

 

Just now...New Year Greetings, Charlton Heston and The 7th Death of 2016.

 

What the shimmering fuck?

[Sir Creep 7,070]

19 hours ago, AngryLazarus said:

 

There's  a thread for actresses, dumbass.

 

 

There's a thread for artists, dumbass.

 

 

There's a thread for sportspeople dumbass. (and for ice hockey as well i think, double dumbass)

 

 

There's a thread for motorsports, dumbass.

 

 

There's a thread for journalists, dumbass. 

Our Admins allow him to exist.  Blame lies where it does.  

[Exciting Eddie 10]

Boring Bob was by very nature the most inoffensive person that could be imagined and yet the admin felt the need to ban him for spamming. I mean, looking at some of the other interesting characters who inhabit this place, Boring Bob was right at home here and could have made many an acquaintance. So why ban him? 

 

It feels like the interesting characters on here always get the short straw. Allowing Zorders and Morbidkid clemency to return but not allowing any of my alter egos regarding of how inoffensive they are stinks of absolute vendetta territory. What I did was no worse than what either of they did. Why am I being persecuted in excess of that levelled at them, against the stayed wishes of your users? 

[Agreeable Aaron 6]

14 minutes ago, Exciting Eddie said:

Boring Bob was by very nature the most inoffensive person that could be imagined and yet the admin felt the need to ban him for spamming. I mean, looking at some of the other interesting characters who inhabit this place, Boring Bob was right at home here and could have made many an acquaintance. So why ban him? 

 

It feels like the interesting characters on here always get the short straw. Allowing Zorders and Morbidkid clemency to return but not allowing any of my alter egos regarding of how inoffensive they are stinks of absolute vendetta territory. What I did was no worse than what either of they did. Why am I being persecuted in excess of that levelled at them, against the stayed wishes of your users? 

 

I couldn't not agree more my friend, as a long time lurker I find the way you have been treated utterly appaling. It's surely some form of discrimination in this enlightened age to mistreat a member of our community in this manner. 

[Exciting Eddie 10]

Just now, Agreeable Aaron said:

 

I couldn't not agree more my friend, as a long time lurker I find the way you have been treated utterly appaling. It's surely some form of discrimination in this enlightened age to mistreat a member of our community in this manner. 

 

I'm glad to have your support, it surely is indeed some form of discrimination from the admin team to ostracise someone who was a valued member of this community for 6 years for a handful of misdemeanours committed in a matter of months. I know most of the community agree with me, it's glad to have even lurkers willing to speak out on my behalf. :) peace out 

[Agreeable Aaron 6]

Just now, Exciting Eddie said:

 

I'm glad to have your support, it surely is indeed some form of discrimination from the admin team to ostracise someone who was a valued member of this community for 6 years for a handful of misdemeanours committed in a matter of months. I know most of the community agree with me, it's glad to have even lurkers willing to speak out on my behalf. peace out 

 

Indeed, I ask the moderators of this great site to look honestly into users eyes and admit that they wouldn't want to be castigated and judged for life on the basis of actions from their late teens and early to mid twenties. Can they honestly say that they were perfect fully rounded people at that age? 

[Exciting Eddie 10]

Just now, Agreeable Aaron said:

 

Indeed, I ask the moderators of this great site to look honestly into users eyes and admit that they wouldn't want to be castigated and judged for life on the basis of actions from their late teens and early to mid twenties. Can they honestly say that they were perfect fully rounded people at that age? 

 

 

Indeed indeed. I'd imagine at that age many of them enjoyed an excess drink or two, a few two many drugs or a good old adrenaline rush. After all a good old adrenaline rush is all I ever sought from a trolling or spamming outburst. Do the admins, whether of the flower power era or the getting pissed in bus shelters to blur era mot at least recognise that universal condition of the human race? Like the sobered up former crack addict seeking forgiveness from the mother he used to rob to feed his habit, I turn to you mods to seek clemency? 

[Agreeable Aaron 6]

1 minute ago, Exciting Eddie said:

 

 

Indeed indeed. I'd imagine at that age many of them enjoyed an excess drink or two, a few two many drugs or a good old adrenaline rush. After all a good old adrenaline rush is all I ever sought from a trolling or spamming outburst. Do the admins, whether of the flower power era or the getting pissed in bus shelters to blur era mot at least recognise that universal condition of the human race? Like the sobered up former crack addict seeking forgiveness from the mother he used to rob to feed his habit, I turn to you mods to seek clemency? 

 

 

As I've already said, this is indeed a very convincing line of thought which I fully agree with. You have my full support Eddie. The way this community has ostracized you despite your past contributions to it is utterly appalling. 

[En Passant 3,740]

Seek therapy.