Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Could somebody please explain to me how, at 9.00am in the morning, a man could smell like a Wrestlers Jockstrap?

I had the misfortune to be standing behind a stinking wretch of a man in a Post Office queue that was, oh, 6 miles long.

There really is no excuse.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Could somebody please explain to me how, at 9.00am in the morning, a man could smell like a Wrestlers Jockstrap?

I had the misfortune to be standing behind a stinking wretch of a man in a Post Office queue that was, oh, 6 miles long.

There really is no excuse.

 

Maybe he'd just finished a night shift.

 

Maybe he had just been on a three hour early morning run.

 

Maybe he's just a smelly tramp claiming his benefits to go and buy 8 cans of Blackthorn for 4 quid in Tesco?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Could somebody please explain to me how, at 9.00am in the morning, a man could smell like a Wrestlers Jockstrap?

I had the misfortune to be standing behind a stinking wretch of a man in a Post Office queue that was, oh, 6 miles long.

There really is no excuse.

 

1)Maybe he'd just finished a night shift.

 

2)Maybe he had just been on a three hour early morning run.

 

3)Maybe he's just a smelly tramp claiming his benefits to go and buy 8 cans of Blackthorn for 4 quid in Tesco?

 

1)Unlikely.

2)Extremely unlikely

3)Likely

4)Highly likely he was just one of those smelly twats that have very poor personal hygene.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

First time in ages that I get any private message here, let alone two, and the forum tells me that I can't answer them both in quick succession. Really. :lol:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Neigbours that decide to re enact the weekly scene from the 1970s TV series Butterflies by maneuvering cars in and out of their drive.....at 5.30AM.

Dickf'uck has already been warned by Lady FN that I am unhappy with his general disregard for his neighbours, his selfishness and the fact that he is a dopey cnut with a ponytail.

The next time it happens, you will all be reading in your newspapapers about the man who was rushed to Hospital with a Mini exhaust pipe rammed up his arse.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The next time it happens, you will all be reading in your newspapapers about the man who was rushed to Hospital with a Mini exhaust pipe rammed up his arse.

 

 

I see. So he is also a violent man?

 

:lol:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Passwords. Bear with me here, I know they are essential but they are down right annoying for two reasons:

 

1) Websites that wouldn't ordinarily need security but you sign up in case you win that holiday (my folks have won transatlantic flights so I don't knock the ebookers et al comps) though essentially it is a ploy to get you on their mailing list. Here I have a variety of passwords I cycle around but I don't mind getting wrong if it blocks it's no major shakes which leads me nicely onto 2.

 

2) Banking or more precisely never being able to remember which password goes with which account (you have to have them all different otherwise it sort of defeats the point doesn't it, although you do end up writing them down or storing that email, again defeating the point). Hands up if you've managed to block an account and then the Robbie Coltrane oh so convenient in your pants becomes an on hold to an outserviced call centre. I've done this on more than one occasion as guess what, even though I've written them down if I can't lay may hands on it within 5 seconds I go with the oh I can guess it no problems...oh b*llocks, how do you say good morning in Gujarati again?

 

This is why I am a great fan of the new algorithm type digibox thing where you type in a pin and it gives you another number to type on t'internet or you even insert your card and type. I just want my credit cards to have the same technology as my bank accounts. I hate that extra verification by VISA step that has crept in as guarenteed I have to reset my password everytime, (I guess I need to write it down). It creeps up on you by surprise as you are not logging into a bank account merely trying to purchase a book, flight, whatever.

 

VIVA The Magic Calculator! (That can go in room lovely!)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Having to retune my Freeview box :lol:.

 

I didn't even think about it yesterday as I never watch channel 5, now I have half an hour to get it retuned in order to see Celtic play Rapid 'Cheating' Vienna :lol: .

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Having to retune my Freeview box :lol:.

 

I didn't even think about it yesterday as I never watch channel 5, now I have half an hour to get it retuned in order to see Celtic play Rapid 'Cheating' Vienna :lol: .

Come on now LG! Dont be too critical of your rivals, Austria and Scotland have much in common.

One spawned one of the most evil and destructive bastards of a leader........... and Austria gave us Hitler.

Rather than label them "cheats" isnt a group hug and empathy the order of the day?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
One spawned one of the most evil and destructive bastards of a leader........... and Austria gave us Hitler.

 

I'm with you on this one. I don't like Alex Salmond either.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
One spawned one of the most evil and destructive bastards of a leader........... and Austria gave us Hitler.

 

I'm with you on this one. I don't like Alex Salmond either.

RE: Signature.......Its "LEG" "END" Winny! :lol:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Societies that use acronyms that are obviously thought of first and the actual name of the society makes little sense, being seemingly random words that relate to the society. ASH, 'Action on Smoking and Health', being one of the 'better' ones.

 

Also alliteration, particularly in relation to newspaper head-lines. Although I quite like, 'Bad Boy Beckham Beds Big Brother Blonde Beauty Bea'.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Societies that use acronyms that are obviously thought of first and the actual name of the society makes little sense, being seemingly random words that relate to the society. ASH, 'Action on Smoking and Health', being one of the 'better' ones.

 

Also alliteration, particularly in relation to newspaper head-lines. Although I quite like, 'Bad Boy Beckham Beds Big Brother Blonde Beauty Bea'.

 

I'd rather alliteration than the 'illiteration' my local newspaper provides me with on a regular basis. Two examples from today's on-line Argus:

 

Near naked students trapped in Brighton life

 

Hove poker player beaten up my rasked raiders

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Societies that use acronyms that are obviously thought of first and the actual name of the society makes little sense, being seemingly random words that relate to the society. ASH, 'Action on Smoking and Health', being one of the 'better' ones.

 

Also alliteration, particularly in relation to newspaper head-lines. Although I quite like, 'Bad Boy Beckham Beds Big Brother Blonde Beauty Bea'.

 

I'd rather alliteration than the 'illiteration' my local newspaper provides me with on a regular basis. Two examples from today's on-line Argus:

 

Near naked students trapped in Brighton life

 

Hove poker player beaten up my rasked raiders

 

Nice to know that my local paper, the Wiltshire Times, is not alone in it's employment of sh'it proof readers. They make numerous spelling mistakes both in their headlines and throughout their stories. So much so in fact, that a local online reader by the name of Marj <_< has taken to commenting upon it in every story they f'uck up. The stupid twats print her remarks, but don't rectify the mistakes!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Societies that use acronyms that are obviously thought of first and the actual name of the society makes little sense, being seemingly random words that relate to the society. ASH, 'Action on Smoking and Health', being one of the 'better' ones.

 

Also alliteration, particularly in relation to newspaper head-lines. Although I quite like, 'Bad Boy Beckham Beds Big Brother Blonde Beauty Bea'.

 

I'd rather alliteration than the 'illiteration' my local newspaper provides me with on a regular basis. Two examples from today's on-line Argus:

 

Near naked students trapped in Brighton life

 

Hove poker player beaten up my rasked raiders

 

Nice to know that my local paper, the Wiltshire Times, is not alone in it's employment of sh'it proof readers. They make numerous spelling mistakes both in their headlines and throughout their stories. So much so in fact, that a local online reader by the name of Marj <_< has taken to commenting upon it in every story they f'uck up. The stupid twats print her remarks, but don't rectify the mistakes!

 

 

Not surprisingly, 'The Argus' and 'The Wiltshire Times' are both published Newsquest Media group, who seem to have got rid of anyone with journalistic experience and integrity and replaced them media studies students on day release.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would like racialist football "commentators" into Room 101.

 

Some non-entity pillock (Effan Ekoku) is giving his expert opinion about the Clelsea v Liverpool game. Given his name, it comes as no surprise that he is gushing effusively about Chelsea's African players. The main commentator had to pull him up when he declared that Drogba is the "best striker in the world"

 

Reminds me of that other simpleton THICKO....Ian Wright. He's SUCH a racialist that he can only discuss black players. If it wasn't for positive discrimination, that thick, mouthy lump of s'hit would never be anywhere in front of a camera. I was so glad when ITV Sport booted him out.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I would like racialist football "commentators" into Room 101.

 

Some non-entity pillock (Effan Ekoku) is giving his expert opinion about the Clelsea v Liverpool game. Given his name, it comes as no surprise that he is gushing effusively about Chelsea's African players. The main commentator had to pull him up when he declared that Drogba is the "best striker in the world"

 

Reminds me of that other simpleton THICKO....Ian Wright. He's SUCH a racialist that he can only discuss black players. If it wasn't for positive discrimination, that thick, mouthy lump of s'hit would never be anywhere in front of a camera. I was so glad when ITV Sport booted him out.

You forgot to mention that he was a scum Gooner too.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I would like racialist football "commentators" into Room 101.

 

Some non-entity pillock (Effan Ekoku) is giving his expert opinion about the Clelsea v Liverpool game. Given his name, it comes as no surprise that he is gushing effusively about Chelsea's African players. The main commentator had to pull him up when he declared that Drogba is the "best striker in the world"

 

Reminds me of that other simpleton THICKO....Ian Wright. He's SUCH a racialist that he can only discuss black players. If it wasn't for positive discrimination, that thick, mouthy lump of s'hit would never be anywhere in front of a camera. I was so glad when ITV Sport booted him out.

You forgot to mention that he was a scum Gooner too.

And despite that, he was also a very good player, who has done rather well for himself.

Of course he had all the advantages of being black and born in south London. If it hadn't been for my blonde hair, blue eyes and university education holding me back, I might have been given more opportunities. :wub:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I would like racialist football "commentators" into Room 101.

 

Some non-entity pillock (Effan Ekoku) is giving his expert opinion about the Clelsea v Liverpool game. Given his name, it comes as no surprise that he is gushing effusively about Chelsea's African players. The main commentator had to pull him up when he declared that Drogba is the "best striker in the world"

 

Reminds me of that other simpleton THICKO....Ian Wright. He's SUCH a racialist that he can only discuss black players. If it wasn't for positive discrimination, that thick, mouthy lump of s'hit would never be anywhere in front of a camera. I was so glad when ITV Sport booted him out.

You forgot to mention that he was a scum Gooner too.

And despite that, he was also a very good player, who has done rather well for himself.

Of course he had all the advantages of being black and born in south London. If it hadn't been for my blonde hair, blue eyes and university education holding me back, I might have been given more opportunities. :wub:

:wub:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Spending the day shivering in your office because the heating has packed in just when you're coming down with flu, no doubt it'll be worse tomorrow when the sneezing really kicks in :wub:.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Spending the day shivering in your office because the heating has packed in just when you're coming down with flu, no doubt it'll be worse tomorrow when the sneezing really kicks in :wub:.

 

Toddy with lots of whiskey in it. Excellent cure.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Perhaps I'm a bit old fashioned, but is sex education for 4 year olds a good idea?

 

I think that primary 7 (11-12 years) is about right - perhaps even p5. But not p1 - that is ridiculous.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Perhaps I'm a bit old fashioned, but is sex education for 4 year olds a good idea?

 

I think that primary 7 (11-12 years) is about right - perhaps even p5. But not p1 - that is ridiculous.

 

 

I don't know, I think it depends how it's handled. I don't think they need to know about sex. However, I do think there's a lot to be said for children knowing the correct names of body parts just so they can articulate themsleves better if they are being abused.

 

I think 11-12 is little bit late really to start teaching sex education as puberty is starting earlier and earlier these days. I think about 8-9 is probably about the right age but then all kids are different.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Perhaps I'm a bit old fashioned, but is sex education for 4 year olds a good idea?

 

I think that primary 7 (11-12 years) is about right - perhaps even p5. But not p1 - that is ridiculous.

 

 

I don't know, I think it depends how it's handled. I don't think they need to know about sex. However, I do think there's a lot to be said for children knowing the correct names of body parts just so they can articulate themsleves better if they are being abused.

 

I think 11-12 is little bit late really to start teaching sex education as puberty is starting earlier and earlier these days. I think about 8-9 is probably about the right age but then all kids are different.

 

Yes - but four and five year olds? Surely we should not assume that children will be abused. Teaching sex education for that reason is a pretty sad state of affairs.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Perhaps I'm a bit old fashioned, but is sex education for 4 year olds a good idea?

 

I think that primary 7 (11-12 years) is about right - perhaps even p5. But not p1 - that is ridiculous.

 

 

I don't know, I think it depends how it's handled. I don't think they need to know about sex. However, I do think there's a lot to be said for children knowing the correct names of body parts just so they can articulate themsleves better if they are being abused.

 

I think 11-12 is little bit late really to start teaching sex education as puberty is starting earlier and earlier these days. I think about 8-9 is probably about the right age but then all kids are different.

 

Yes - but four and five year olds? Surely we should not assume that children will be abused. Teaching sex education for that reason is a pretty sad state of affairs.

 

I agree, I'm not saying all children will be abused, but I still think children that age should know that a penis is called a penis and a vagina a vagina, there's is no need to go into any more detail than that. This can be incorporated into a general lesson and doesn't need to be seen as a big scary sex lesson. It's not necessarily sex education to learn about the names of body parts. I don't think four and five year olds need to know about sexual intercourse, but there's nothing wrong with the odd lesson on health, biology, different types of families which can then lead onto lessons about sex etc when they get a bit older.

 

Anway Win, you asked a question and I answered and that's that really.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×

Important Information

Your use of this forum is subject to our Terms of Use