Lard Bazaar 3,800 Posted August 3, 2007 As far as I am concerned <20 child pornography pics or vids for a p2p user does not even establish paedophilia on a balance of probabilities never mind beyond reasonable doubt. People get curious. People download job lots of files on p2p. Frankly most serious internet users have seen child pornography (including i'm sure everyone on this board) and only a very small minority are actually paedophiles. Many have downloaded by accident or on purpose videos of iraqis being beheaded. Does that make them murderers? To understand Langhams case we need context and details. What media outlet is providing that? None as far as I can see. Because most readers are just buffoons shouting "string 'im up and rip off his goolies". No and no. Curious - bollox, research purposes - bollox. A high percentage of the population have morals and know right from wrong without having check that wrong is in fact wrong. I'm sorry but I have to disagree with most things you've said and if any download was by accident I hope people would have the gaul to report the relevant sites to the authorities. I guess I'm not a serious internet user if what you say is true but I hope I am not the only one. I am of the mind that NOT everyone on this board has downloaded such filth as you suggest. I cannot be sure as that would involve assuming, which as I've said before makes an ass of u and me. You are definitely not the only one Monoclonic, I have never seen these vile images either, I've never even come across a link to them on anything I have viewed on the internet. What's a 'serious' internet user - I've never seen child pornography, or accidently come across it, or whatever - although I have seen the video of Saddam coming to an end. Does that make me a weirdo - I don't know, maybe it does. I think someone else might have said this (forgive me, I've just woken up) but in my very humble opinion, if one needed to 'research' this subject, would they not go to one of the relevant authorities or organisations to gather information, rather than doing it on your own PC on the internet - everyone surely knows the risks of doing something like that on your own personal computer? And I'm afraid this 'I was abused' crap doesn't wash with me - if one was abused as a child that is awful, but there surely comes a time when you grow up and realise what is right and what is wrong? Perhaps I'm looking at things too simply. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Brinsworth House Baiter 12 Posted August 3, 2007 As far as I am concerned <20 child pornography pics or vids for a p2p user does not even establish paedophilia on a balance of probabilities never mind beyond reasonable doubt. People get curious. People download job lots of files on p2p. Frankly most serious internet users have seen child pornography (including i'm sure everyone on this board) and only a very small minority are actually paedophiles. Many have downloaded by accident or on purpose videos of iraqis being beheaded. Does that make them murderers? To understand Langhams case we need context and details. What media outlet is providing that? None as far as I can see. Because most readers are just buffoons shouting "string 'im up and rip off his goolies". Further to other replies... What the f**k? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
millwall32 114 Posted August 4, 2007 I know him a little bit and I think that a screw will find him hanging froma rudimentary noose some time soon Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Brinsworth House Baiter 12 Posted August 6, 2007 I know him a little bit and I think that a screw will find him hanging froma rudimentary noose some time soon I reckon you're right, Millwall. He doesn't strike me as a man who'll be able to handle jail time. Then again I never thought Johnathan King would serve more than a week of his time without swinging himself from a rolled up blanket. I've always thought that it takes a certain amount of guts to actually take your life, and the question is whether Langham has that amount. Cheers, BHB Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Saint Peter 14 Posted August 6, 2007 He doesn't strike me as a man who'll be able to handle jail time. If he has not practiced loosening his sphincter, Big Bubba his cell mate certainly will. Do think he would rather be Mummy or Daddy His only hope is that he enjoys it!!! Hell mend him Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Brinsworth House Baiter 12 Posted August 6, 2007 He doesn't strike me as a man who'll be able to handle jail time. If he has not practiced loosening his sphincter, Big Bubba his cell mate certainly will. Do think he would rather be Mummy or Daddy His only hope is that he enjoys it!!! Hell mend him To rework an old joke: Langham: Um, I'm your new cell mate. Big Bubba: Do you wanna be mummy or daddy? Langham (thinking quickly): Um, if I have to choose I think I'd rather be daddy. Big Bubba: Okay, come here and suck mummy's cock. Cheers, BHB Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lord Fellatio Nelson 6,220 Posted August 6, 2007 He doesn't strike me as a man who'll be able to handle jail time. If he has not practiced loosening his sphincter, Big Bubba his cell mate certainly will. Do think he would rather be Mummy or Daddy His only hope is that he enjoys it!!! Hell mend him To rework an old joke: Langham: Um, I'm your new cell mate. Big Bubba: Do you wanna be mummy or daddy? Langham (thinking quickly): Um, if I have to choose I think I'd rather be daddy. Big Bubba: Okay, come here and suck mummy's cock. Cheers, BHB Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Godot 149 Posted September 9, 2007 Langham is sentenced on Friday, still a few days to find a pair of braces. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
maryportfuncity 10,658 Posted September 9, 2007 Still a few days to hurl himself in front of a train. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Godot 149 Posted September 9, 2007 Still a few days to hurl himself in front of a train. From his cell? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Brinsworth House Baiter 12 Posted September 9, 2007 Still a few days to hurl himself in front of a train. From his cell? Perhaps he has a Hornby in there. I think it's diabolical the special privileges these celebrities get inside.... Cheers, BHB Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
maryportfuncity 10,658 Posted September 9, 2007 Still a few days to hurl himself in front of a train. From his cell? Is he still inside? I thought he'd been given some time out to sort out his business affairs after the trial. Might be back inside now, though. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Youth in Asia 1,087 Posted September 9, 2007 Still a few days to hurl himself in front of a train. From his cell? Is he still inside? I thought he'd been given some time out to sort out his business affairs after the trial. Might be back inside now, though. Maybe they let him out to get a SPAM prescription Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
maryportfuncity 10,658 Posted September 14, 2007 Today's the day! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dave 0 Posted September 14, 2007 he's just been given a 10 month jail sentence-but because of time served and remission he could be out in just 6 weeks-lucky man.Looks like hes going to survive this time around. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
themaninblack 2,112 Posted September 14, 2007 he's just been given a 10 month jail sentence-but because of time served and remission he could be out in just 6 weeks-lucky man.Looks like hes going to survive this time around. Yes, but you'll find his career has gone for a Burton.... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dave 0 Posted September 14, 2007 yeah I know-its a shame.All he did was download some pictures off the net after all.Hes hardly a serial killer! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Phantom 2,536 Posted September 14, 2007 yeah I know-its a shame.All he did was download some pictures off the net after all.Hes hardly a serial killer! They weren't just regular snapshots that he downloaded. Tell that to the children in the photos that were abused when the pictures were taken Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dave 0 Posted September 14, 2007 but hes not a murderer or a rapist is he.so he shouldnt be treated as if he is Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
maryportfuncity 10,658 Posted September 14, 2007 but hes not a murderer or a rapist is he.so he shouldnt be treated as if he is No, but he's a registered sex offender with a proven interest in children and a track record of a jury and some of his closest colleagues not buying the argument in his defence. I think the abuse on this thread fairly light in response. Dunno if he's a straight suicide risk but the career suicide just committed may stop his recovery from drugs and alcohol. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Youth in Asia 1,087 Posted September 14, 2007 but hes not a murderer or a rapist is he.so he shouldnt be treated as if he is I'd be careful - if you make common sense comments like that you'll set off some of the Daily Mail reading members of DL on their paedophiles-under-the-bed rants. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dave 0 Posted September 14, 2007 dont get me wrong-if Langham had actually harmed a hair on some kid I'd be the first person to say lock him away for the next 10 years at least,but the fact is the court decided that he was a m inor offender who only got a few months and with remission the guys going to be out in 6 weeks time so hes allready halfway through his sentence-he aint going to commit suicide so this thread might as well be closed Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Harvester Of Souls 40 Posted September 14, 2007 It's official... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jimh 4 Posted September 15, 2007 Something about butterflies and wheels springs to mind. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Brinsworth House Baiter 12 Posted September 17, 2007 yeah I know-its a shame.All he did was download some pictures off the net after all.Hes hardly a serial killer! No, he's worse than a serial killer. 'All he did was download some pictures off the net.' WTF? The very nature of what he was downloading and wanking over makes him a beast of the highest nature. The whole scenario fills with me with a rage and the wish to vomit. Much like your blase post. You're not a judge by any chance, are you? It matters not about personal opinion concerning Langham's gifts as a writer or comedian- it doesn't change the fact that he's a nonce. Serial killers get more respect in jail than nonces. BHB Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
