Rotten Ali 600 Posted February 3, 2014 Best to wait for the charges to be brought forward before speculation gets too mad. 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Dr. Zorders 1,271 Posted February 3, 2014 The victim was only ten years old? Why do they always target The Young Ones? Congratulations are due to the victim for having the courage to come forward after all his time, an ordeal like that can't have been much of a Summer Holiday. Luckily, shes said to have been able to show the police where the unnamed suspect touched her, using a Living Doll for reference. This was all recorded in a room which was Wired For Sound, so it can be shown to the jury later if need be. I just hope the defence don't do the usual of trying to paint her as some sort of Devil Woman, as I Just Don't Have The Heart to hear her being berated to the point where she decides to tell the court that 'We Don't Talk Anymore'. In any event, I send the victim All My Love and All I Ask Of You is that you join me in saying a Millennium Prayer for her this Saviours Day. This is what the internet was made for. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Guest Posted February 6, 2014 Can I be the first to congratulate William Roache on his acqittal today and look forward to Rolf Harris and the other celebrities also being cleared of the ridiculous and trivial charges against them Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JR976evil 906 Posted February 7, 2014 Can I once again propose the permanent banning of guests? 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Paul Bearer 6,102 Posted February 7, 2014 Ken Barlow (William Roach) found not guilty. In summing up, the judge reckoned that his victims must all have been Manchester City supporters. You hear nothing from them for 40 odd years, then they all pipe up at once! 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Bibliogryphon 9,586 Posted February 7, 2014 I was impressed by the trial of DLT when as a witness for the defence they called Barry Chuckle. The judge told him to restrict his statements to the use of the term I rather than we when referring to his recollections. Maybe the exchange went something like this: "I am interested in how things seemed to you" BC: " To me?" I'll stop now 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Bibliogryphon 9,586 Posted February 11, 2014 Well DLT was presenting TOTP's with stuff by bangers of the day like ''Racey'' Some girls will, some girls won'tSome girls need a lot of lovin' and some girls don't Well, I know I've got the fever but I don't know why Some say they will and some girls lie Open invitation imho......... If we are talking slightly creepy peado lyrics is anyone else slightly disturbed in this context by Neil Sedaka's Happy Birthday Sweet Sixteen. You could interpret is as being 'Thank God now it is legal' or am I being harsh? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lard Bazaar 3,799 Posted February 11, 2014 As much as I like the look of what's contained in his tight trousers, it was brought to my attention in the car the other day that Olly Murs also sings songs that are a bit rapey. There I was, in the Scenic, tanking along the A36, having a bit of a Mum-crush while warbling away, when I realised the actual words I was singing - (in no particular order) 'What I've got girl, I know you're gonna love it' 'Won't take no for an answer tonight' 'Tonight nothing's getting in my way, I'm gonna get what's mine' 'Telling me no, no, you really mean yes, yes' There is more, but I'm too distressed to continue, and will be calling Inspector Yewtree immediately. 3 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Bibliogryphon 9,586 Posted February 11, 2014 As much as I like the look of what's contained in his tight trousers, it was brought to my attention in the car the other day that Olly Murs also sings songs that are a bit rapey. There I was, in the Scenic, tanking along the A36, having a bit of a Mum-crush while warbling away, when I realised the actual words I was singing - (in no particular order) 'What I've got girl, I know you're gonna love it' 'Won't take no for an answer tonight' 'Tonight nothing's getting in my way, I'm gonna get what's mine' 'Telling me no, no, you really mean yes, yes' There is more, but I'm too distressed to continue, and will be calling Inspector Yewtree immediately. I am not overly familier with the work of Mr Murrs but I get the impression that there is not a lot going on between the ears and if he is given the words to sing then he will sing them without engaging the brain. Who writes his songs? Paul Gadd? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Toast 16,140 Posted February 11, 2014 If we are talking slightly creepy peado lyrics is anyone else slightly disturbed in this context by Neil Sedaka's Happy Birthday Sweet Sixteen. You could interpret is as being 'Thank God now it is legal' or am I being harsh? Your interpretation may not be inaccurate, but please don't perpetuate the incorrect use of the term "paedophile". Paedos (sic) are sexually attracted to children - prepubescent children, not 15 year old girls. I believe Mr Sedaka is an American, and the legal age of consent varies between states. So the young lady in question might even be "illegal" at 17, depending on where she resided. It has naff all to do with paedophilia, though. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Bibliogryphon 9,586 Posted February 11, 2014 If we are talking slightly creepy peado lyrics is anyone else slightly disturbed in this context by Neil Sedaka's Happy Birthday Sweet Sixteen. You could interpret is as being 'Thank God now it is legal' or am I being harsh? Your interpretation may not be inaccurate, but please don't perpetuate the incorrect use of the term "paedophile". Paedos (sic) are sexually attracted to children - prepubescent children, not 15 year old girls. I believe Mr Sedaka is an American, and the legal age of consent varies between states. So the young lady in question might even be "illegal" at 17, depending on where she resided. It has naff all to do with paedophilia, though. Thank you for your clarification and I consider myself chastised but it might be helpful if you could do something about the whole of the British press who use the term almsot indiscriminately when talking about sexual allegations about celebrities. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Bibliogryphon 9,586 Posted February 11, 2014 If we are talking slightly creepy peado lyrics is anyone else slightly disturbed in this context by Neil Sedaka's Happy Birthday Sweet Sixteen. You could interpret is as being 'Thank God now it is legal' or am I being harsh? Your interpretation may not be inaccurate, but please don't perpetuate the incorrect use of the term "paedophile". Paedos (sic) are sexually attracted to children - prepubescent children, not 15 year old girls. I believe Mr Sedaka is an American, and the legal age of consent varies between states. So the young lady in question might even be "illegal" at 17, depending on where she resided. It has naff all to do with paedophilia, though. Thank you for your clarification and I consider myself chastised but it might be helpful if you could do something about the whole of the British press who use the term almsot indiscriminately when talking about sexual allegations about celebrities. Tonight's the night I've waited for Because you're not a baby anymore You've turned into the prettiest girl I've ever seen Happy birthday sweet sixteen What happened to that funny face My little tomboy now wears satin and lace I can't believe my eyes you're just a teenage dream Happy birthday sweet sixteen When you were only six I was your big brother Then when you were ten We didn't like each other When you were thirteen You were my funny valentine But since you've grown up Your future is sewn up From now on you're gonna be mine, so If I should smile with sweet surprise It's just that you've grown up before my very eyes You've turned into the prettiest girl I've ever seen Happy birthday sweet sixteen Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Davey Jones' Locker 1,324 Posted February 11, 2014 I am waiting for this lyric to catch up with Cold Chisel (VERY famous band in Australia): Well there ain't nothin' better than to rip your sweater In a bang behind the stage Or the drawn out sigh as you feel her thigh Then you stop and estimate her age If she's turned fourteen she's a rock'n'roll queen You can give her anything you choose And when she whispers, "Honey it's the money or the box", You know money's so easy to lose Source: http://www.coldchise...-gonna-roll-ya/ Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Toast 16,140 Posted February 12, 2014 If we are talking slightly creepy peado lyrics is anyone else slightly disturbed in this context by Neil Sedaka's Happy Birthday Sweet Sixteen. You could interpret is as being 'Thank God now it is legal' or am I being harsh? Your interpretation may not be inaccurate, but please don't perpetuate the incorrect use of the term "paedophile". Paedos (sic) are sexually attracted to children - prepubescent children, not 15 year old girls. I believe Mr Sedaka is an American, and the legal age of consent varies between states. So the young lady in question might even be "illegal" at 17, depending on where she resided. It has naff all to do with paedophilia, though. Thank you for your clarification and I consider myself chastised but it might be helpful if you could do something about the whole of the British press who use the term almsot indiscriminately when talking about sexual allegations about celebrities. Got to start somewhere. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
EGN 121 Posted February 13, 2014 Actually, the prefix 'Paedo' comes from the greek 'Paidos' meaning 'child' or 'boy', while the suffix 'phile' is from 'philos', which means 'lover', so the literal translation of 'paedophile' is 'childlover' or 'boylover'. Its does not specifically, nor is it intended to, relate to prepubescent children or toddlers. If you are etymologically inclined, 'Pederast' has the same prefix root, but takes its suffix from the Greek 'erastes', also meaning 'lover', but is usually taken to pertain to adolescent males. Incidentally, I have a fair bit to do with paedophiles professionally and any adult (18 and up) who has sex with children (15 and down) is one in my book. And that book is Blackstones. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Toast 16,140 Posted February 13, 2014 Yes, I'm aware of the etymology. There's also nothing particularly sexual about the "phile" suffix, it merely denotes someone who enjoys or loves something. As with our own 'Bibliophile' - a lover of books. The literal meaning of 'paedophile' is simply someone who loves children. I'm more of a paedophobe myself. 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Spade_Cooley 9,528 Posted February 13, 2014 Incidentally, I have a fair bit to do with paedophiles professionally Real ale pub landlord? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Magere Hein 1,400 Posted February 13, 2014 Incidentally, I have a fair bit to do with paedophiles professionally Real ale pub landlord? Bishop? regards, Hein Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Guest Posted February 13, 2014 another day .another celebrity cleared.(DLT for those who havent seen the news) Operation Yewtree is falling apart faster than an actual yew tree in a hurricane! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Toast 16,140 Posted February 13, 2014 another day .another celebrity cleared.(DLT for those who havent seen the news) Operation Yewtree is falling apart faster than an actual yew tree in a hurricane! But what DLT is accused of seems to be little more than went on in any place of work or entertainment in the 70s and 80s. The office groper or dirty old man copping a sly feel, pinching your arse. Not nice, but tolerated by society at the time ("Just try and keep out of his way, dear"). The case should never have gone to court. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Paul Bearer 6,102 Posted February 14, 2014 Q. Whats a Catholic priest & a pint of Guinness got in common? A. black coat, white collar & you've got to watch your arse if you get a dodgy one! 4 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
thefunkyfaz 51 Posted February 16, 2014 Q. Whats a Catholic priest & a pint of Guinness got in common? A. black coat, white collar & you've got to watch your arse if you get a dodgy one! Genius. 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Davey Jones' Locker 1,324 Posted February 16, 2014 Incidentally, I have a fair bit to do with paedophiles professionally and any adult (18 and up) who has sex with children (15 and down) is one in my book. And that book is Blackstones. EGN, how are your esteemed colleagues in the constabulary going with the investigation into this "beloved pop star"? Can you give us any very broad idea how things are going without, obviously, compromising anything? Things have gone very quiet there... If it is who you and everyone on every blog out there thinks it is, me Mum'll be devastated... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
EGN 121 Posted February 17, 2014 I must stress that I am in NO WAY connected to anything even remotely to do with any investigation into any celebrities noncing any kiddies at any time. I just have access to the internet and a cynical world view. But it DOES seem to have gone a bit quiet regarding the latest high profile celebrity accusations against a certain individual, beloved of Davey's mum. What I suspect is that Somethin's Goin' On, and that an individual is Wanted by the police for questioning. This person appears to be Bold As Brass, however this may just be Soulacious gossip and an explanation from his Lucky Lips may yet lead to the revelation that he is simply a Misunderstood Man. What i do know is that I wouldn't trust the individual with my High Class Baby. Oh, and I don't know why it has popped into my head at this particular moment, but are readers of this thread aware of the concept of a 'super-injuction'? This is a legal device whereby a banning notice is served on any media outlet reporting allegations made against an individual, which also incorporates a ban on mentioning that said injunction is in place. Remember all the silly bother Ryan Giggs got into when he tried to have one and the whole of twitter wouldn't let him? Well, sometimes they work. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Dr. Zorders 1,271 Posted February 17, 2014 At first it was funny but now I think the fact that you can name so many Cliff Richard songs/albums is a bit worrying...! 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
