Toast 16,231 Posted March 11 4 hours ago, An Fear Beag said: Wait a minute! Are you telling me that photos are sometimes altered before publication to make the people in them look slightly better? Well fuck me sideways!! So these agencies are accusing the Prince & Princess of Wales of lying and deception? Nice. Ridiculous, isn't it. It's particularly common with young children in the photo as they tend to fidget and mess about and it's difficult to get one shot where everybody kept still. So you lift a better image from another shot and paste it in. I remember the photo of the late Queen with her great-grandchildren had people crying "photoshop" because it looked as it Louis had been pasted in. Most likely he was, so what? ETA Here's a sensible deconstruction of the offending photo. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
time 8,672 Posted March 11 Had Kate not been off the radar since her hospital stay, it would barely have registered. Still if its a simple as choosing the best image of several taken, a simple way of quietening the outrage would be to release the other photographs. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
maryportfuncity 10,682 Posted March 11 5 minutes ago, time said: Had Kate not been off the radar since her hospital stay, it would barely have registered. Still if its a simple as choosing the best image of several taken, a simple way of quietening the outrage would be to release the other photographs. Aye, including the one where that big guy with a black cloak and a scythe showed up! 1 3 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Brad252 821 Posted March 11 Is it too soon to call this year Charles' "annus horriblis"? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
QHov 5 Posted March 11 15 minutes ago, Brad252 said: Is it too soon to call this year Charles' "annus horriblis"? Anus Horriblis surely? 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ulitzer95 12,842 Posted March 11 21 minutes ago, Brad252 said: Is it too soon to call this year Charles' "annus horriblis"? Well surely that depends on if the cancer is in his rectum or not. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
openviews 334 Posted March 11 Preview image on the BBC site makes him look more unwell than he does here. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-68538031 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Old Crem 3,628 Posted March 11 Just popping in to post this. 1 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RoverAndOut 4,754 Posted March 12 Tom Kingston (Lady Gabriella's husband) was cremated today in a private ceremony with about 140 mourners including the Prince of Wales but not the King (obvious reasons) or Queen (hosting an event at Buck Pal). Disappointingly predictable levels of accuracy on the Beeb's article though: (nope) (ah, got there eventually ) https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-68549345 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RoverAndOut 4,754 Posted March 12 On a lighter note: 1 10 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sod's Law 468 Posted March 12 I'm also getting the nagging suspicion there was something fishy about that 'Queen' who jumped out of the helicopter at the 2012 Olympics... 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
maryportfuncity 10,682 Posted March 12 Meanwhile, the different photos out there are just getting silly now! 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Brad252 821 Posted March 12 23 minutes ago, maryportfuncity said: Meanwhile, the different photos out there are just getting silly now! If Andrew had said "we can't be sure that's my hand" regarding this "picture", I'd believe him for once. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TQR 14,451 Posted March 12 The (Prince) Willy Wanka experience 3 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
gcreptile 11,055 Posted March 13 Is Catherine dead? asks John Oliver jokingly: https://metro.co.uk/2024/03/13/tv-host-jokes-kate-middleton-could-died-18-months-ago-20454361/ I mean, I kind of get it. The future queen hasn't been seen in months. Why have a picture with the children anyway? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Toast 16,231 Posted March 13 4 minutes ago, gcreptile said: I mean, I kind of get it. The future queen hasn't been seen in months. Why have a picture with the children anyway? 1. She hasn't been seen because she's been ill and is recovering from debilitating surgery. 2. Because they regularly post family photos, and it was to mark Mother's Day. This whole thing is utterly ridiculous. Practically every celeb photo published has been edited in some way, why don't they "kill" those? 4 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mango 192 Posted March 13 I'm surprised Kate doesn't have her own thread at this point. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ulitzer95 12,842 Posted March 13 1 minute ago, mymango said: I'm surprised Kate doesn't have her own thread at this point. Don’t even think about it. 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mango 192 Posted March 13 Just now, Ulitzer95 said: Don’t even think about it. We have a thread for Sunak even though he's as fit as a fiddle. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ulitzer95 12,842 Posted March 13 30 minutes ago, mymango said: We have a thread for Sunak even though he's as fit as a fiddle. Yes, and Liz Truss and Keir Starmer, cos ppl like to have rants that nobody reads on here. Still, two wrongs don't make a right in this case. There's zero evidence to assume she has anything that will affect her health long term. 3 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Slackhurst Broadcasting 376 Posted March 13 3 hours ago, gcreptile said: Is Catherine dead? asks John Oliver jokingly: https://metro.co.uk/2024/03/13/tv-host-jokes-kate-middleton-could-died-18-months-ago-20454361/ Replaced with a double, maybe? When she at last makes another appearance in public, will she be barefoot? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mango 192 Posted March 13 1 hour ago, Ulitzer95 said: Yes, and Liz Truss and Keir Starmer, cos ppl like to have rants that nobody reads on here. Still, two wrongs don't make a right in this case. There's zero evidence to assume she has anything that will affect her health long term. If this wiki article is kept, I think such a thread would probably prove worthwhile in time. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ulitzer95 12,842 Posted March 13 7 minutes ago, mymango said: If this wiki article is kept, I think such a thread would probably prove worthwhile in time. Just because some ppl are obsessed, doesn't mean we need to be too. I would suggest there are other ways out there for you to curb your autism, mango. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
