Jump to content
Star Crossed

Should Notapotato Be Stripped Of His Moderatorship?

Should NAP be reduced to normal membership?  

88 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts

I voted "No", personally I think NAP is doing a fine job. I've not known NAP to abuse his moderator status to resolve personal disputes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How interesting....

 

I(myself & LG) go away for a wee while and stuff like this happens, hey I dunno what this is all about even....(that's what we get for missing the meetings I guess).

 

Personally I gotta say I've never saw NAP do anything bad to anyone out of spite or anything else and I trully believe he is NOT of that nature anyway.

 

I will put this down to a misunderstanding and I think you guys should just kiss & make up...(ohh what a thread that would make eh!!!) hehehe

 

NAP & yourself SC are both my friends and I think we should all just get on with it and do what we love to do best......Bitch at the Celebs !!!

 

regards

scsi

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Star Crossed is a complete w**ker and deserves to be ignored by everyone. Please ban him he is spoiling the forum, he is really boring, I'm off to watch television instead.

Is this the opposite of 70s/80s kids TV show "Why don't you...?"?

 

I voted no - don't exclude him (or anyone) just for being different

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You're entering a world of pain Walter. You knew you were when you did this. It's a bit silly donchathink? I sometimes enjoy your hate-filled invective but this kind of thing does you no credit. Notapotato is as fine a potato that is not one that you are likely (or not) to find anywhere.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I went to the Emirates stadium earlier along with 60,000 others, and, at an appropriate moment, elected to urinate. The male urinals were, very slightly, how can I say, 'hippo house'. As I tapped my draining member, reflectively, I gave thanks to the wretches who must clear our ill-aimed fluids at the end of the day.

 

Dear Readers, are our moderators not in the same boat? They tidy up our daily outpourings with good grace. Shouldn't we, from time to time, accept that, their exposure to our verbal whiffs and emissions entitles them to the occasional bout of officious censorship. Notapotato has on occasion commented on my deviation from the strict purpose of this site. Nevertheless, I admire the fellow's dedication to a thankless task. Keep it up NAP. God bless you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmmm toilets at a football ground, what will they think of next? For years now in the lower leagues we've piled all the excrement on the pitch.

 

I trust NAP's tactful and tolerant hand will exercise itself upon me if the above is in any way off topic!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I voted no.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I voted No.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Guest
Hmmm toilets at a football ground, what will they think of next? For years now in the lower leagues we've piled all the excrement on the pitch.

 

I trust NAP's tactful and tolerant hand will exercise itself upon me if the above is in any way off topic!

 

 

 

 

Maryport had a football ground once but it had a design fault, they put the seats in facing the pitch :(

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Do we have to wait for the results from the Luxemburg jury or can we take these results as being conclusive?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Do we have to wait for the results from the Luxemburg jury or can we take these results as being conclusive?

 

 

Maybe we shoud go to Peter Snow and see what his swing-o-meter says?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmmm toilets at a football ground, what will they think of next? For years now in the lower leagues we've piled all the excrement on the pitch.

 

I trust NAP's tactful and tolerant hand will exercise itself upon me if the above is in any way off topic!

 

 

 

 

Maryport had a football ground once but it had a design fault, they put the seats in facing the pitch :)

 

 

:(;):D:D:D

 

Maryport never had a proper ground but the same joke has done the rounds about Workington - just down the road - for years. Any football fans in Maryport would sooner go thirty odd miles to Carlisle than a couple of stops down the train line, which takes you just beyond Borough Park; home of Workington Reds.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
;):D:D:D:)

 

Maryport never had a proper ground but the same joke has done the rounds about Workington - just down the road - for years. Any football fans in Maryport would sooner go thirty odd miles to Carlisle than a couple of stops down the train line, which takes you just beyond Borough Park; home of Workington Reds.

 

Or a couple more train stops across the border :(

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Do we have to wait for the results from the Luxemburg jury or can we take these results as being conclusive?

That reads as if, even had they gone entirely the other way, the results would have held any sway whatsoever with the status of nap's modship.

 

Since when is the DL a democracy?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Mind there's mystery to be had here. Assuming SC is one of the two 'yes' votes, who is the other? I'll admit to voting with the majority on this occasion.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Pointless nonsense, didn't vote.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I feel the same way about general elections.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Do we have to wait for the results from the Luxemburg jury or can we take these results as being conclusive?

That reads as if, even had they gone entirely the other way, the results would have held any sway whatsoever with the status of nap's modship.

 

Since when is the DL a democracy?

 

I hope it's not, I much prefer a dictatorship :P

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Mind there's mystery to be had here. Assuming SC is one of the two 'yes' votes, who is the other? I'll admit to voting with the majority on this occasion.

Who is Matt Hopkins?

 

Let me guess ...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Mind there's mystery to be had here. Assuming SC is one of the two 'yes' votes, who is the other? I'll admit to voting with the majority on this occasion.

Who is Matt Hopkins?

 

Let me guess ...

 

That's a very disturbing read. Imagine spending all that time writing such a steaming heap!?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Do we have to wait for the results from the Luxemburg jury or can we take these results as being conclusive?

That reads as if, even had they gone entirely the other way, the results would have held any sway whatsoever with the status of nap's modship.

 

Since when is the DL a democracy?

 

I hope it's not, I much prefer a dictatorship :P

 

 

Would that be a squid led dictatorship?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Mind there's mystery to be had here. Assuming SC is one of the two 'yes' votes, who is the other? I'll admit to voting with the majority on this occasion.

Who is Matt Hopkins?

 

Let me guess ...

 

I like how in one of the pictures he's given names to the animals, including "Windsor", "Six" and "iain". Talk about attention to detail.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Mind there's mystery to be had here. Assuming SC is one of the two 'yes' votes, who is the other? I'll admit to voting with the majority on this occasion.

Who is Matt Hopkins?

 

Let me guess ...

 

Has the whore-finder general lost yet?

I suggest we put him out his misery.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

From the Whorefinder's page:

 

 

One of the first documented cases instigated by Hopkins was against a woman named Elizabeth Clarke. She was a one-legged widow from Maryport, or so the story goes, whose life had begun at five O'clock, or was it Six?

 

That's f*****g outrageous, and wrong........I don't have an 'e' at the end of my name.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×

Important Information

Your use of this forum is subject to our Terms of Use