En Passant 3,741 Posted September 15 3 hours ago, The Old Crem said: With Labour assume anything they won’t rule out doing when asked as something that is going to happen. They'd better bloody not. It's already one of the most wildly unfair taxes where a two up two down in Hartlepool or somewhere similar pays more for 'local' services than a mansion in Westminster. It needs reform without question, but not that way. Any decent society should pay for services such as adult social care. it should not however do it on the basis that more social care is required in poorer local areas than in rich Central London ones on the basis that thats where the social care is required (and even possibly that's where they put the recipients in the first place because it was cheap). In my view even the poll tax was fairer - why should a single person pay effectively double what a couple does? They already pay 1.5 times the amount. There's nothing 'local' about it - it's a nationwide obligation and should be paid for nationally. 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Old Crem 3,583 Posted September 16 13 hours ago, En Passant said: They'd better bloody not. It's already one of the most wildly unfair taxes where a two up two down in Hartlepool or somewhere similar pays more for 'local' services than a mansion in Westminster. It needs reform without question, but not that way. Any decent society should pay for services such as adult social care. it should not however do it on the basis that more social care is required in poorer local areas than in rich Central London ones on the basis that thats where the social care is required (and even possibly that's where they put the recipients in the first place because it was cheap). In my view even the poll tax was fairer - why should a single person pay effectively double what a couple does? They already pay 1.5 times the amount. There's nothing 'local' about it - it's a nationwide obligation and should be paid for nationally. Labour ruled out updating the bands (Would be electoral suicide in London as even the poorer areas like where I am wouid get massively higher bills). I agree that Social care really should be a National funded thing. The postcode lottery has been very noticeable for a long while. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
En Passant 3,741 Posted September 16 1 hour ago, The Old Crem said: I agree that Social care really should be a National funded thing. The postcode lottery has been very noticeable for a long while. And for those under the misapprehension that council tax is mostly spent on bin collection, the police and fire services and potholes or suchforth (nobody really does but it's oft quoted) -around 60p in the pound in 2020 went on either adult or childrens social care (split about 70/30 adult/child). The table quoted was a forecast at the time not hard data - it's the best I found with a short search. Re-iteration, I'm not saying these costs should not be paid, of course they should - I am saying I can see no justifiable reason why folks in Hartlepool should pay more for them because more care homes are located there than in Oxford Street, Pall Mall or Mayfair. 1 hour ago, The Old Crem said: Labour ruled out updating the bands (Would be electoral suicide in London as even the poorer areas like where I am wouid get massively higher bills). As to this, it's a fudge at best anyway. What would be the point in Westminster or Kensington and Chelsea having a huge surplus whilst poorer areas were still left with Councils going bust? It needs a complete overhaul and the only reason I can think of that it hasn't is that all parties are terrified of it electorally - especially those with memories long enough for the poll tax riots. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Old Crem 3,583 Posted September 16 Sussex school bans mobile phones and smartwatches to cut out 'distractions' Schools should be urging BT to bring back public phone-boxes. That’s the big difference between now and the pre mobile phone era. I don’t think it should be public policy to encourage teens to have to ask random strangers if needed. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Old Crem 3,583 Posted September 16 2 hours ago, En Passant said: And for those under the misapprehension that council tax is mostly spent on bin collection, the police and fire services and potholes or suchforth (nobody really does but it's oft quoted) -around 60p in the pound in 2020 went on either adult or childrens social care (split about 70/30 adult/child). The table quoted was a forecast at the time not hard data - it's the best I found with a short search. Re-iteration, I'm not saying these costs should not be paid, of course they should - I am saying I can see no justifiable reason why folks in Hartlepool should pay more for them because more care homes are located there than in Oxford Street, Pall Mall or Mayfair. As to this, it's a fudge at best anyway. What would be the point in Westminster or Kensington and Chelsea having a huge surplus whilst poorer areas were still left with Councils going bust? It needs a complete overhaul and the only reason I can think of that it hasn't is that all parties are terrified of it electorally - especially those with memories long enough for the poll tax riots. I thought the council the person is from pays for care homes for those who can’t access (Normally due to living ‘healthy’ spouse) or do not have any money? Rather than the council where the person lives. Otherwise I agree that is an even more unfair burden on areas which appear to have more homes than other areas - on top of the natural fact that people who can’t pay for a home are not evenly distributed Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ladyfiona 2,578 Posted September 16 5 hours ago, The Old Crem said: Sussex school bans mobile phones and smartwatches to cut out 'distractions' Schools should be urging BT to bring back public phone-boxes. That’s the big difference between now and the pre mobile phone era. I don’t think it should be public policy to encourage teens to have to ask random strangers if needed. We had this rule in 2000 when I had Nokia 3210. People still took phones to school, just made sure they were off or on silent. Not all kids are obsessed with TikTok. They may actually need their phone on/nearby for medical reasons, being a carer etc. There are even apps on phones that are for anxiety, tuition...etc etc. Don't have a smartwatch, but you will still get boys having a watch that has an alarm that distracts everyone in lesson. Not even sure what that was about in the 00's when I was at school. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lord Fellatio Nelson 6,218 Posted September 16 My, oh my! We didn't have mobile phones when I was at school, yeah, I'm cracking on a bit! How did we ever get through school and life without one!! 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JQW 281 Posted September 16 We only had a landline at home because my dad needed it for his job - our house was tied to his then workplace. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Toast 16,137 Posted September 16 1 hour ago, Lord Fellatio Nelson said: My, oh my! We didn't have mobile phones when I was at school, yeah, I'm cracking on a bit! How did we ever get through school and life without one!! It's a wonder we survived with all the deadly hazards. https://twitter.com/ScarredForLife2/status/1835352272563286435 (Note - changing x to twitter in the url didn't work for me) 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
time 8,599 Posted September 17 11 hours ago, Toast said: It's a wonder we survived with all the deadly hazards. https://twitter.com/ScarredForLife2/status/1835352272563286435 (Note - changing x to twitter in the url didn't work for me) Despite appearances, that's still an 'x' url (hover your cursor over it) 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Toast 16,137 Posted September 17 1 hour ago, time said: Despite appearances, that's still an 'x' url (hover your cursor over it) So what does one have to do to make it work? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lord Fellatio Nelson 6,218 Posted September 17 14 hours ago, Toast said: It's a wonder we survived with all the deadly hazards. https://twitter.com/ScarredForLife2/status/1835352272563286435 (Note - changing x to twitter in the url didn't work for me) Yes, the good old public information films! There are some absolute corkers out there! 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Toast 16,137 Posted September 17 4 hours ago, Lord Fellatio Nelson said: Yes, the good old public information films! There are some absolute corkers out there! Indeed there are. Surely there must be a thread about them. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Brad252 807 Posted September 18 https://x.com/BrexitPirates/status/1836436968768422358 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
YoungWillz 21,037 Posted September 19 Is it absolutely impossible for Starmer to pay for his wife's dresses or tickets to see his favourite footy team or pop idols? Needs to get his fucking shit together. Either that or he can leave. Get to work on the country's problems and keep doing that until you drop. Forget about your trips, your freebies and bribes and do your job. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Old Crem 3,583 Posted September 19 Starmer has once again refused to rule out axing the single person council tax discount. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
maryportfuncity 10,646 Posted September 20 I'm wondering if there's Truss vs lettuce potential here. This robust ex-serviceman will survive the winter but who'll go first; the Daily Express which has shed around 90% of its readers in 30 years or the last of Britain's atomic test veterans. Either way, let's celebrate once more the style and accuracy that's taken the Express to its current level of popularity and relevance. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JQW 281 Posted September 20 I gather Daily Express editor Gary Jones stood down this week after a tenure of about six years. Does this point to problems at the rag? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Summer in Transylvania 2,175 Posted September 20 This is probably the funniest thing I have seen all day. 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ladyfiona 2,578 Posted September 21 My team leader won't shut up about hating Kier Starmer and thinks I love him (I literally voted Lib Dem). She reads Daily Mail at her desk and gives Priti Patel a run for her money regarding her right wing views. I just nod along because work wise she is a good team leader/manager and I need her on my side at work in the coming months because of reasons. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RoverAndOut 4,746 Posted September 21 On 16/09/2024 at 15:32, The Old Crem said: Sussex school bans mobile phones and smartwatches to cut out 'distractions' Schools should be urging BT to bring back public phone-boxes. That’s the big difference between now and the pre mobile phone era. I don’t think it should be public policy to encourage teens to have to ask random strangers if needed. This is not unusual. The school I'm currently in has a "no phones" policy. They are switched off and in their bags. If it goes off, it is confiscated and collected from the office by a parent. The previous school I worked in allowed them more, but there were still confiscations if they were out in class. Another school I've worked in required students to hand their phones in during form at the start of the day and collect them from form at the end of the day. There are loads of rules around no phones in school and there is no requirement for them to have access to them during school time. The worst offenders are actually parents texting their children instead of phoning the school to pass on a message as they're supposed to. But what you're saying is (once again) a fucking nonsense. They are capable of having access to their phones for the journey to and from school without having it in school. It's not hard. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RoverAndOut 4,746 Posted September 21 On 17/09/2024 at 12:04, Toast said: So what does one have to do to make it work? As you don't seem to have received an answer to this, I have discovered the way to make it work is to retype the url in the forum. If you copy and paste the url and then change the x.com to twitter.com, then it stays a link. So instead, I copy and paste it but then underneath type out exactly what it says (including all the numbers) but with twitter.com instead of x.com and then it loads as it used to (you can delete the pasted x.com link then too). Takes a minute or two but at least the tweets show up as they should. Fucking Elon Musk. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
maryportfuncity 10,646 Posted September 21 On 20/09/2024 at 11:21, JQW said: I gather Daily Express editor Gary Jones stood down this week after a tenure of about six years. Does this point to problems at the rag? There have been problems there for years, the obvious one being a lack of readers. Not sure his departure indicates a new level of panic. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Old Crem 3,583 Posted September 22 Labour U turn and decide to keep the single person council tax discount says the Telegraph.. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
AstroKat 532 Posted September 22 Since the removal of the single person council tax reduction was merely speculation, though not publicly ruled out, this is not technically a U turn. 5 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites