Magere Hein 1,399 Posted December 13, 2015 I've spent the last few minutes looking at age checks for a forum. Other than using credit cards there's no way of knowing the age of the person typing an age or day of birth. That reality makes this discussion academic. Feel free to continue it.Hein, my original post pertained to members who have stated that they are 'of a childs age' which is more like going up to the newsagents counter with a Porn mag, being asked your age and saying 'Well, im 15 but it doesn't matter because I can see people shagging online anyway. Yeah, I understand that we have no idea who signs up to this place, deranged, underage or otherwise but when its obvious maybe we ought to be a bit cautious. There is so much shit flying around nowdays in Blighty about kids accessing 'innapropriate websites' it will only take one parent to start the ball rolling. We should never feel that smug that we are immune from unwanted attention or summat. I appreciate your concern and I freely admit that my unavoidably Dutch view on such matters doesn't sense the finer points of the latest moral outrage in the tabloids. I wouldn't want a forum invasion by Mumsnet members. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Windsor 2,233 Posted December 13, 2015 LFN told me he was 14 like a month ago. He sends his uncle to DL Cons as a cover... I say we ban him. 3 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lord Fellatio Nelson 6,218 Posted December 13, 2015 LFN told me he was 14 like a month ago. He sends his uncle to DL Cons as a cover... I say we ban him. ..........you mean 'uncle'...... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
maryportfuncity 10,616 Posted December 13, 2015 I've spent the last few minutes looking at age checks for a forum. Other than using credit cards there's no way of knowing the age of the person typing an age or day of birth. That reality makes this discussion academic. Feel free to continue it.Hein, my original post pertained to members who have stated that they are 'of a childs age' which is more like going up to the newsagents counter with a Porn mag, being asked your age and saying 'Well, im 15 but it doesn't matter because I can see people shagging online anyway.Yeah, I understand that we have no idea who signs up to this place, deranged, underage or otherwise but when its obvious maybe we ought to be a bit cautious. There is so much shit flying around nowdays in Blighty about kids accessing 'innapropriate websites' it will only take one parent to start the ball rolling. We should never feel that smug that we are immune from unwanted attention or summat. I appreciate your concern and I freely admit that my unavoidably Dutch view on such matters doesn't sense the finer points of the latest moral outrage in the tabloids. I wouldn't want a forum invasion by Mumsnet members. Don't knock Mumsnet, mind, some of them may have good - obitable - tips the rest of us are missing. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lard Bazaar 3,799 Posted December 13, 2015 I don't think forum users should be judged on their age, they should be judged on the quality of their posts. And if they're constantly posting utter and complete cuntfuckery, they should be banned. 3 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sir Creep 7,069 Posted December 13, 2015 Fuck all. That is all, as you were. SC 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lord Fellatio Nelson 6,218 Posted December 13, 2015 I don't think forum users should be judged on their age, they should be judged on the quality of their posts. And if they're constantly posting utter and complete cuntfuckery, they should be banned. Well that's 32% of the forum members out of the door. Where shall we find another forum to inhabit Lardy? 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Toast 16,075 Posted December 14, 2015 I don't think forum users should be judged on their age, they should be judged on the quality of their posts. And if they're constantly posting utter and complete cuntfuckery, they should be banned. Well that's 32% of the forum members out of the door. Where shall we find another forum to inhabit Lardy? Mumsnet? 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lord Fellatio Nelson 6,218 Posted December 14, 2015 I don't think forum users should be judged on their age, they should be judged on the quality of their posts. And if they're constantly posting utter and complete cuntfuckery, they should be banned. Well that's 32% of the forum members out of the door. Where shall we find another forum to inhabit Lardy? Mumsnet? Toastie, Im not that suicidal. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Spade_Cooley 9,477 Posted December 14, 2015 Do I need to add Mumsnet to the list of forums I scour for "sad news about [marginally obit-worthy charity worker]" posts over the xmas period then? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
charon 4,943 Posted December 14, 2015 Hell yes. They got trolled this year or last by another forum I'm on. They responded in numbers and it all ended smashingly (one mum posting a pic of her tits with writing on them to prove she was a dame). Now those sort of actions make me not care about the health updates on there. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lord Fellatio Nelson 6,218 Posted December 14, 2015 Hell yes. They got trolled this year or last by another forum I'm on. They responded in numbers and it all ended smashingly (one mum posting a pic of her tits with writing on them to prove she was a dame). Now those sort of actions make me not care about the health updates on there. Post em up!!!! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
charon 4,943 Posted December 14, 2015 Lol, unsurprisingly, even though it was in the nsfw (ie you must 'say' you're over 18, like that works) section , they were swiftly deleted and shortly after she got punted when peace broke out between the two forums. I think they have been posted back up a few times by posters who saved the pic, but they don't last long . SparklingBrook was the bints name, I remember that much Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Bibliogryphon 9,519 Posted December 14, 2015 Lets face it that teenagers are tech savvy. It is probably better they are in here than watching hardcore porn or buying drugs on line. I am sure that if parental controls are in place then this forum would be blocked. I say let them stay if they can cope with the constant verbal abuse and the correction of their grammer. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Deathray 2,940 Posted December 14, 2015 Lets face it that teenagers are tech savvy. It is probably better they are in here than watching hardcore porn or buying drugs on line. I am sure that if parental controls are in place then this forum would be blocked. I say let them stay if they can cope with the constant verbal abuse and the correction of their grammer. It isn't on the default content blocker than Vodafone uses but curiously the DDP site is. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
time 8,576 Posted December 14, 2015 Lets face it that teenagers are tech savvy. It is probably better they are in here than watching hardcore porn or buying drugs on line. I am sure that if parental controls are in place then this forum would be blocked. I say let them stay if they can cope with the constant verbal abuse and the correction of their grammer.grammar. and spelling. 7 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Bibliogryphon 9,519 Posted December 14, 2015 Lets face it that teenagers are tech savvy. It is probably better they are in here than watching hardcore porn or buying drugs on line. I am sure that if parental controls are in place then this forum would be blocked. I say let them stay if they can cope with the constant verbal abuse and the correction of their grammer.grammar. and spelling. I deserved that one......(shame) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Toast 16,075 Posted December 14, 2015 Lets face it that teenagers are tech savvy. It is probably better they are in here than watching hardcore porn or buying drugs on line. I am sure that if parental controls are in place then this forum would be blocked. I say let them stay if they can cope with the constant verbal abuse and the correction of their grammer.grammar. and spelling. I was just going to point that one out Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
maryportfuncity 10,616 Posted December 14, 2015 Lets face it that teenagers are tech savvy. It is probably better they are in here than watching hardcore porn or buying drugs on line. I am sure that if parental controls are in place then this forum would be blocked. I say let them stay if they can cope with the constant verbal abuse and the correction of their grammer.grammar. and spelling. I was just going to point that one out Aye, sorted, so there's an entrance exam from now on asking to distinguish between their/they're/there and in what circumstances one might usefully employ a semi-colon 4 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Bibliogryphon 9,519 Posted December 14, 2015 Lets face it that teenagers are tech savvy. It is probably better they are in here than watching hardcore porn or buying drugs on line. I am sure that if parental controls are in place then this forum would be blocked. I say let them stay if they can cope with the constant verbal abuse and the correction of their grammer.grammar. and spelling. I was just going to point that one out Aye, sorted, so there's an entrance exam from now on asking to distinguish between their/they're/there and in what circumstances one might usefully employ a semi-colon That will resort in Time being the only poster. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
time 8,576 Posted December 14, 2015 Lets face it that teenagers are tech savvy. It is probably better they are in here than watching hardcore porn or buying drugs on line. I am sure that if parental controls are in place then this forum would be blocked. I say let them stay if they can cope with the constant verbal abuse and the correction of their grammer.grammar. and spelling. I was just going to point that one out Aye, sorted, so there's an entrance exam from now on asking to distinguish between their/they're/there and in what circumstances one might usefully employ a semi-colon That will resort (!!) in Time being the only poster. Maybe honez will reappear. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Bibliogryphon 9,519 Posted December 14, 2015 Lets face it that teenagers are tech savvy. It is probably better they are in here than watching hardcore porn or buying drugs on line. I am sure that if parental controls are in place then this forum would be blocked. I say let them stay if they can cope with the constant verbal abuse and the correction of their grammer.grammar. and spelling. I was just going to point that one out Aye, sorted, so there's an entrance exam from now on asking to distinguish between their/they're/there and in what circumstances one might usefully employ a semi-colon That will resort (!!) in Time being the only poster. Maybe honez will reappear. re·sort (rĭ-zôrt′) intr.v. re·sort·ed, re·sort·ing, re·sorts 1. To turn to or make use of a person, strategy, or course of action for help or as 2. To go, especially customarily or frequently; repair: "The whale-bone whales can at last resort to their Polar citadels" (HermanMelville).a means of achieving something: The governmentresorted to censorship of the press. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Phantom 2,531 Posted December 14, 2015 I can see no point of placing an age restriction on site. There are only a handful of regulars who post to the comments. Others tend to be from guests who drop by from time to time.How many profiles on here that have been created where the person signed up, made one comment several years ago and has probably forgotten their username and password, or forgotten the site completely? Short of there being an option "Are you over 14/16/17? Click "Yes" or "No"" you've no control over it. Even use of grammar and spelling doesn't mean much these days. I know one person who has 4 bachelor degrees, just finished up on their PhD, works at the local uni as their head librarian, and the majority of emails I get from her I have to decipher because of how atrocious her grammar and spelling is. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Bibliogryphon 9,519 Posted December 14, 2015 I can see no point of placing an age restriction on site. There are only a handful of regulars who post to the comments. Others tend to be from guests who drop by from time to time. How many profiles on here that have been created where the person signed up, made one comment several years ago and has probably forgotten their username and password, or forgotten the site completely? Short of there being an option "Are you over 14/16/17? Click "Yes" or "No"" you've no control over it. Even use of grammar and spelling doesn't mean much these days. I know one person who has 4 bachelor degrees, just finished up on their PhD, works at the local uni as their head librarian, and the majority of emails I get from her I have to decipher because of how atrocious her grammar and spelling is. I wasn't demanding it was good only that the posters are Man enough to take the flack from the grammar Nazis Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Toast 16,075 Posted December 14, 2015 Lets face it that teenagers are tech savvy. It is probably better they are in here than watching hardcore porn or buying drugs on line. I am sure that if parental controls are in place then this forum would be blocked. I say let them stay if they can cope with the constant verbal abuse and the correction of their grammer.grammar. and spelling. I was just going to point that one out Aye, sorted, so there's an entrance exam from now on asking to distinguish between their/they're/there and in what circumstances one might usefully employ a semi-colon And the correct usage of 'less' and 'fewer'. 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites