Slackhurst Broadcasting 374 Posted July 29 I looked up the definitions of image categories. Category A – Images involving penetrative sexual activity, sexual activity with an animal or sadism Category B – Images involving non-penetrative sexual activity Category C – Indecent images not falling in categories A or B I suppose the dropped-trouser pic would fall into category C, least serious - notwithstanding its nightmarish quality for anyone who's seen him announcing the Queen's death and other state occasions. On the other hand he's plainly involved in the making of that image, and the making of indecent images is a more serious offence than mere possession of them. If he's visible in the A and B pictures he could be in a lot of trouble. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
maryportfuncity 10,639 Posted July 29 5 minutes ago, Slackhurst Broadcasting said: I looked up the definitions of image categories. Category A – Images involving penetrative sexual activity, sexual activity with an animal or sadism Category B – Images involving non-penetrative sexual activity Category C – Indecent images not falling in categories A or B I suppose the dropped-trouser pic would fall into category C, least serious - notwithstanding its nightmarish quality for anyone who's seen him announcing the Queen's death and other state occasions. On the other hand he's plainly involved in the making of that image, and the making of indecent images is a more serious offence than mere possession of them. If he's visible in the A and B pictures he could be in a lot of trouble. Hell yeah, beyond even the redemitive possibilities of the celebrity jungle! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ladyfiona 2,572 Posted July 29 1 hour ago, Brad252 said: Looks like the BBC announcing the Queen's death won't be on public record anymore if found guilty. -In walks AI- "I heard you have a problem." Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Old Crem 3,580 Posted July 29 1 hour ago, Toast said: There's no good reason for not showing it. I can't see the justification for pretending certain people never existed because they've done something wrong. If there was any consistency to it, much of history would be wiped. They will just use the radio version. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Old Crem 3,580 Posted July 29 52 minutes ago, Slackhurst Broadcasting said: I looked up the definitions of image categories. Category A – Images involving penetrative sexual activity, sexual activity with an animal or sadism Category B – Images involving non-penetrative sexual activity Category C – Indecent images not falling in categories A or B I suppose the dropped-trouser pic would fall into category C, least serious - notwithstanding its nightmarish quality for anyone who's seen him announcing the Queen's death and other state occasions. On the other hand he's plainly involved in the making of that image, and the making of indecent images is a more serious offence than mere possession of them. If he's visible in the A and B pictures he could be in a lot of trouble. The trouser pic can’t be a child porn image - it was just him. The pictures seem to be of minors not just sent to them. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sod's Law 443 Posted July 29 Aw damn, I used to like him too. I once did an audio tour of Cardiff Castle and it was his voice narrating it. He was surprisingly good at making the place come to life. Mind you, I also used to like Neil Oliver and look at the rabbit hole he's been plunging down since Covid. Maybe I ought to just stop liking people on TV (a lesson my parents' generation will have learned long ago by now). 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Brad252 806 Posted July 29 1 hour ago, The Old Crem said: They will just use the radio version. Maybe even the "Dance version": https://youtu.be/NAkxOQ5zOOk?si=lRdA35pTXlBI46w7 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Comped 525 Posted July 29 2 hours ago, The Old Crem said: They will just use the radio version. Or they could co-opt one of the other networks if they absolutely had to. Would not be ideal, but possible. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Slackhurst Broadcasting 374 Posted July 29 3 hours ago, The Old Crem said: The trouser pic can’t be a child porn image - it was just him. The pictures seem to be of minors not just sent to them. So it's less awful than the pictures he's been charged for. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Comped 525 Posted July 30 2 hours ago, Slackhurst Broadcasting said: So it's less awful than the pictures he's been charged for. Legally speaking most likely. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
YoungWillz 21,023 Posted July 31 Pleads guilty: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cmj260e54x7o 3 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Father Brown 209 Posted July 31 Submitted a guilty plea. Willz just beat me to it! 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ulitzer95 12,574 Posted July 31 On 13/07/2023 at 19:16, ladyfiona said: Jonathan Pie's opinion. Jonathan Pie now has pie all over his face. Not the first time his big gob has jumped the gun and made him look like a twat, and won’t be the last. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
maryportfuncity 10,639 Posted July 31 Rockin' the MIB look 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Brad252 806 Posted July 31 59 minutes ago, Ulitzer95 said: Jonathan Pie now has pie all over his face. Not the first time his big gob has jumped the gun and made him look like a twat, and won’t be the last. Funnily enough he has recently retweeted Rachel Reeves from 2017 saying Labour stand up for Winter fuel allowance (among other aspects of pensioner support) and said this hasn't aged well. No surprise a number of the replies contain that video he did on Huw Edwards in a pot kettle black style fashion. Jonathan Pie on X: "Have to say it, this hasn’t aged well." / X (twitter.com) That said the charges he's plead guilty to are not the same ones that the Met were investigating last year, and Pie could (and should) issue a retraction and admit he got that wrong. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RoverAndOut 4,745 Posted July 31 Just to say, so that we're clear, that the term "making images" apparently doesn't necessarily mean what it sounds like. Receiving images via social media can be classified as "making images" and there is no suggestion that Edwards has made anything in a conventional sense. All seems to be linked to a single WhatsApp conversation exchanging pornographic material, some of which was illegal in nature, which he was aware of, at least to some degree (he did request nothing illegal at some point). Most of the images concern children between 12 and 15 but 2 Category A images involved a 7- to 9-year-old. This is only information, not a comment on the severity of his actions or the charges. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cmj260e54x7o 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
pazuzu 9 Posted July 31 Well some wikipedia editor has something to say about him anyway, if you look him up Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Master Obit 828 Posted July 31 4 hours ago, pazuzu said: Well some wikipedia editor has something to say about him anyway, if you look him up It's absolutely shameful that there are people like this out there. Putting the month first in the date is completely unacceptable. 1 8 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Toast 16,129 Posted July 31 29 minutes ago, Master Obit said: Putting the month first in the date is completely unacceptable. The expiry date on the covid tests delivered yesterday is 2024 - 10 - 11 I can't tell if that means October or November. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Master Obit 828 Posted July 31 5 minutes ago, Toast said: The expiry date on the covid tests delivered yesterday is 2024 - 10 - 11 I can't tell if that means October or November. In any civilised country, October. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JustPassingThrough 148 Posted July 31 1 hour ago, Toast said: The expiry date on the covid tests delivered yesterday is 2024 - 10 - 11 I can't tell if that means October or November. October. Numerical Year-Month-Day (ISO 8601) should be relatively standard everywhere, I'd think, even in a country that still spell the month first. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ulitzer95 12,574 Posted July 31 How’s about that then? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Youth in Asia 1,086 Posted July 31 So if someone posts some dodgy pictures through your letterbox, you can go to jail? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Windsor 2,233 Posted July 31 46 minutes ago, Youth in Asia said: So if someone posts some dodgy pictures through your letterbox, you can go to jail? If someone gives you pictures on one occasion and you keep swapping them after seeing the illegal ones…probably. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ladyfiona 2,572 Posted July 31 7 hours ago, Ulitzer95 said: Jonathan Pie now has pie all over his face. Not the first time his big gob has jumped the gun and made him look like a twat, and won’t be the last. I considered going to see him on tour. Instead i'm going to see a Youtuber called Max Fosh. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
