Huw Edwards

[Slackhurst Broadcasting 374]

I looked up the definitions of image categories.

 

• Category A – Images involving penetrative sexual activity, sexual activity with an animal or sadism
• Category B – Images involving non-penetrative sexual activity
• Category C – Indecent images not falling in categories A or B

 

I suppose the dropped-trouser pic would fall into category C, least serious - notwithstanding its nightmarish quality for anyone who's seen him announcing the Queen's death and other state occasions. On the other hand he's plainly involved in the making of that image, and the making of indecent images is a more serious offence than mere possession of them. If he's visible in the A and B pictures he could be in a lot of trouble.

[maryportfuncity 10,639]

5 minutes ago, Slackhurst Broadcasting said:

I looked up the definitions of image categories.

 

 

• Category A – Images involving penetrative sexual activity, sexual activity with an animal or sadism
• Category B – Images involving non-penetrative sexual activity
• Category C – Indecent images not falling in categories A or B

 

I suppose the dropped-trouser pic would fall into category C, least serious - notwithstanding its nightmarish quality for anyone who's seen him announcing the Queen's death and other state occasions. On the other hand he's plainly involved in the making of that image, and the making of indecent images is a more serious offence than mere possession of them. If he's visible in the A and B pictures he could be in a lot of trouble.

 

 

Hell yeah, beyond even the redemitive possibilities of the celebrity jungle! 

 

 

[ladyfiona 2,572]

1 hour ago, Brad252 said:

Looks like the BBC announcing the Queen's death won't be on public record anymore if found guilty.

 

-In walks AI- "I heard you have a problem."

[The Old Crem 3,580]

1 hour ago, Toast said:

 

There's no good reason for not showing it.  I can't see the justification for pretending certain people never existed because they've done something wrong. 

If there was any consistency to it, much of history would be wiped.

They will just use the radio version. 

[The Old Crem 3,580]

52 minutes ago, Slackhurst Broadcasting said:

I looked up the definitions of image categories.

 

 

• Category A – Images involving penetrative sexual activity, sexual activity with an animal or sadism
• Category B – Images involving non-penetrative sexual activity
• Category C – Indecent images not falling in categories A or B

 

I suppose the dropped-trouser pic would fall into category C, least serious - notwithstanding its nightmarish quality for anyone who's seen him announcing the Queen's death and other state occasions. On the other hand he's plainly involved in the making of that image, and the making of indecent images is a more serious offence than mere possession of them. If he's visible in the A and B pictures he could be in a lot of trouble.

The trouser pic can’t be a child porn image - it was just him. The pictures seem to be of minors not just sent to them. 

[Sod's Law 443]

Aw damn, I used to like him too. I once did an audio tour of Cardiff Castle and it was his voice narrating it. He was surprisingly good at making the place come to life. 

 

Mind you, I also used to like Neil Oliver and look at the rabbit hole he's been plunging down since Covid. Maybe I ought to just stop liking people on TV (a lesson my parents' generation will have learned long ago by now). 

[Brad252 806]

1 hour ago, The Old Crem said:

They will just use the radio version. 

Maybe even the "Dance version":

 

https://youtu.be/NAkxOQ5zOOk?si=lRdA35pTXlBI46w7

[Comped 525]

2 hours ago, The Old Crem said:

They will just use the radio version. 

Or they could co-opt one of the other networks if they absolutely had to. Would not be ideal, but possible.

[Slackhurst Broadcasting 374]

3 hours ago, The Old Crem said:

The trouser pic can’t be a child porn image - it was just him. The pictures seem to be of minors not just sent to them. 

 

So it's less awful than the pictures he's been charged for.

[Comped 525]

2 hours ago, Slackhurst Broadcasting said:

 

So it's less awful than the pictures he's been charged for.

Legally speaking most likely.

[YoungWillz 21,023]

Pleads guilty: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cmj260e54x7o

[Father Brown 209]

Submitted a guilty plea. 
 

Willz just beat me to it!

[Ulitzer95 12,574]

On 13/07/2023 at 19:16, ladyfiona said:

Jonathan Pie's opinion.

 

 

Jonathan Pie now has pie all over his face.

 

Not the first time his big gob has jumped the gun and made him look like a twat, and won’t be the last.

[maryportfuncity 10,639]

Rockin'  the MIB look

 

 

 

[Brad252 806]

59 minutes ago, Ulitzer95 said:

Jonathan Pie now has pie all over his face.

 

Not the first time his big gob has jumped the gun and made him look like a twat, and won’t be the last.

Funnily enough he has recently retweeted Rachel Reeves from 2017 saying Labour stand up for Winter fuel allowance (among other aspects of pensioner support) and said this hasn't aged well. No surprise a number of the replies contain that video he did on Huw Edwards in a pot kettle black style fashion.

 

Jonathan Pie on X: "Have to say it, this hasn’t aged well." / X (twitter.com)

 

That said the charges he's plead guilty to are not the same ones that the Met were investigating last year, and Pie could (and should) issue a retraction and admit he got that wrong.

 

 

[RoverAndOut 4,745]

Just to say, so that we're clear, that the term "making images" apparently doesn't necessarily mean what it sounds like. Receiving images via social media can be classified as "making images" and there is no suggestion that Edwards has made anything in a conventional sense. All seems to be linked to a single WhatsApp conversation exchanging pornographic material, some of which was illegal in nature, which he was aware of, at least to some degree (he did request nothing illegal at some point). Most of the images concern children between 12 and 15 but 2 Category A images involved a 7- to 9-year-old.

 

This is only information, not a comment on the severity of his actions or the charges. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cmj260e54x7o

[pazuzu 9]

Well some wikipedia editor has something to say about him anyway, if you look him up

[Master Obit 828]

4 hours ago, pazuzu said:

Well some wikipedia editor has something to say about him anyway, if you look him up

It's absolutely shameful that there are people like this out there. Putting the month first in the date is completely unacceptable.

[Toast 16,129]

29 minutes ago, Master Obit said:

Putting the month first in the date is completely unacceptable.

 

The expiry date on the covid tests delivered yesterday is 2024 - 10 - 11

I can't tell if that means October or November.

[Master Obit 828]

5 minutes ago, Toast said:

 

The expiry date on the covid tests delivered yesterday is 2024 - 10 - 11

I can't tell if that means October or November.

In any civilised country, October.

[JustPassingThrough 148]

1 hour ago, Toast said:

 

The expiry date on the covid tests delivered yesterday is 2024 - 10 - 11

I can't tell if that means October or November.

October. Numerical Year-Month-Day (ISO 8601) should be relatively standard everywhere, I'd think, even in a country that still spell the month first. 

[Ulitzer95 12,574]

How’s about that then?

 

[Youth in Asia 1,085]

So if someone posts some dodgy pictures through your letterbox, you can go to jail?

[Windsor 2,233]

46 minutes ago, Youth in Asia said:

So if someone posts some dodgy pictures through your letterbox, you can go to jail?

If someone gives you pictures on one occasion and you keep swapping them after seeing the illegal ones…probably. 

[ladyfiona 2,572]

7 hours ago, Ulitzer95 said:

Jonathan Pie now has pie all over his face.

 

Not the first time his big gob has jumped the gun and made him look like a twat, and won’t be the last.

 

I considered going to see him on tour. Instead i'm going to see a Youtuber called Max Fosh.