Jump to content
Handrejka

Johnny Hallyday

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, Joey Russ said:

She's 42. People can still be very beautiful on the outside at 42...

Agreed, see Jenna Fischer (From The Office US, I think she's 43 actually but whatever) and Gwen Stefani (who's 47 but looks the same as she did 20 years ago...)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, Joey Russ said:

She's 42. People can still be very beautiful on the outside at 42...

Nobody said otherwise.  What's your point? 

 

My point was that it is ridiculous to make insinuations of paedophilia when the female involved is 42 years old.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Toast said:

Nobody said otherwise.  What's your point? 

 

My point was that it is ridiculous to make insinuations of paedophilia when the female involved is 42 years old.

Sorry, I was trying to direct that to theoldlady on her actual age, I didn't mean to quote your post. But you definitely made your point very clear. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The way the photo is airbrushed it makes the female look extremely young. The guy looks ancient. It is just something show-business does, like an inprinting that it is acceptable for extremely 'young' people to be with old men. There are lots of predators out there, and show-biz folk are  trying to make pedaphilia a normal thing. ( Remember in Britain homosexuality was illegal until the 1950s or so - that view was changed by the media. Now they are working on changing societal attitudes on child/adult sex.)

  • Angry 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No, they're really not.

 

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, theoldlady said:

The way the photo is airbrushed it makes the female look extremely young. The guy looks ancient. It is just something show-business does, like an inprinting that it is acceptable for extremely 'young' people to be with old men. There are lots of predators out there, and show-biz folk are trying to make pedaphilia a normal thing. ( Remember in Britain homosexuality was illegal until the 1950s or so - that view was changed by the media. Now they are working on changing societal attitudes on child/adult sex.)

 

Do you know what paedophilia means?  It means being sexually attracted to PRE-PUBESCENT CHILDREN.  You are trivialising the word.

Being attracted to post-pubertal teenagers is totally different, and is not unnatural.  It is not paedophilia.  Neither is having a much younger/older sexual partner, which is something that has been going on since time immemorial.

The only people who might be "trying to make paedophilia a normal thing" are paedophiles themselves.

 

If people insist on re-defining the term 'paedophilia' and change its meaning, what do we have left to describe the much more serious, unnatural and disturbing condition of being sexually attracted to PRE-PUBESCENT CHILDREN? 

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, theoldlady said:

The way the photo is airbrushed it makes the female look extremely young. The guy looks ancient. It is just something show-business does, like an inprinting that it is acceptable for extremely 'young' people to be with old men. There are lots of predators out there, and show-biz folk are  trying to make pedaphilia a normal thing. ( Remember in Britain homosexuality was illegal until the 1950s or so - that view was changed by the media. Now they are working on changing societal attitudes on child/adult sex.)

Oh shut the fuck up you very stupid old lady.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Really can't stand the whole "acceptance of homosexuality is paving the way for acceptance of wanting to fuck children/animals/what have you" perspective. Only one of those involves two consenting adults.

  • Like 10

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A minority of left wing activists try to equate the two but it is a shit comparison and rightly pisses off many homosexuals.

 

Older men have married much younger women for decades.Providing they are dating someone 18 or over i.e an adult it poses no danger at all.A neighbour of mine is 49 and her husband is 77 and they have been together for 20 years and happily married for 17.

 

By that logic Hugh Hefner Ronnie Wood Joan Collins Barbara Windsor Clint Eastwood  Madonna Tina Turner and Brigitte Macron are all paedos!

 

I mean Johnny Hallyday is no Bill Wyman or Doug Hutchinson who I would argue are strange.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Shaun of the Dead said:

A minority of right  wing activists try to equate the two but it is a shit comparison and rightly pisses off many homosexuals.

 

Older men have married much younger women for decades.Providing they are dating someone 18 or over i.e an adult it poses no danger at all.A neighbour of mine is 49 and her husband is 77 and they have been together for 20 years and happily married for 17.

 

By that logic Hugh Hefner Ronnie Wood Joan Collins Barbara Windsor Clint Eastwood  Madonna Tina Turner and Brigitte Macron are all paedos!

 

I mean Johnny Hallyday is no Bill Wyman or Doug Hutchinson who I would argue are strange.

Left wing activists are not the ones against gays.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
55 minutes ago, The Mad Hatter said:

Left wing activists are not the ones against gays.

I guess it can be both.I meant to say left but both apply.The left more though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No i don't think that applies to the left at all. Left wing activists are pro lgbt rights and that would mean that the gays leads to pedophila would be presented as positive which it never had been because that argument is against gay rights.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
51 minutes ago, The Mad Hatter said:

No i don't think that applies to the left at all. Left wing activists are pro lgbt rights and that would mean that the gays leads to pedophila would be presented as positive which it never had been because that argument is against gay rights.

Some in far left groups such as the NCCL entertained PIE which campared the gay liberation movement to the paedo rights movement.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Basic arseholery doesn't need its own spot on the political spectrum, plenty of them at both ends. And indeed in the middle.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Absolutely but defending paedos does seem to be a position taken by the extremes in the most part.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, Shaun of the Dead said:

Absolutely but defending paedos does seem to be a position taken by the extremes in the most part.

 

Aye, but both extremes, and should be roundly denounced by everyone.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I never said otherwise.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have merely heard it fron the left more but equally depolarable whether left or right.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

*sigh* Let us be absolutely clear. We are all agreed that two consenting human adults of whatever gender who are in love should be equal, right? To equate that with anything other seems to me a great leap.

 

When I was at university, it was quite clear regarding the major political party's positions on homosexuality - I'm talking about the so-called centre of the 1980s. Thatch saw us as AIDS spreading scum and openly and brazenly denied rights, took away some and actively encouraged her fascist state police to arrest on sight for mere hand holding or kissing in public. The Labour Party quite clearly embraced gay rights as a political sop - their so-called face of minority rights on the face hid an underlying hatred also. After all, they had miners' and steelworkers' jobs to fight for, they weren't exactly forward at opposing Section 28 or Thatch on such rights - if you want to get elected, you don't get into bed with minorities. So it's not a left or right argument.

 

Things have changed, yes laws have changed. Attitudes less so, I'd say. There are still women who are paid less than men, still people who fear other people for the colour of their skin or their accent, still people who see anything other than their straight line from birth to death via marriage and kids as abnormal, abhorrent and can only lead to the breakdown of society.

 

On a site where death is our preoccupation, how people get there is nobody's concern. It unifies us all, levels the population at it's most basic condition. So do try and get along, tolerate a bit more and take a deep breath when seeing something outwith your definition of normal as the end of the world.

 

Imo....;)

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So odds on Hallyday making 2018?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Shaun of the Dead said:

So odds on Hallyday making 2018?

I think he has a higher chance of making 2018 then he did 3 months ago, since he's preparing for a 2018 tour. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'll take a stab at "He's not going on a Summer Hallyday, no more working....ever" in 2018.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Surely most people buying tickets must be thinking will he even be alive then?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×

Important Information

Your use of this forum is subject to our Terms of Use