Donald J Trump

[Joey Russ 7,149]

The New York Times says it perfectly. 

[Zsa Zsa's leg 764]

https://www.google.com/amp/abcnews.go.com/amp/Politics/attorney-general-jeff-sessions-suggested-resign-amid-rising/story%3Fid%3D47875090

Jeff Sessions, white supremacist attorney general is now likely to resign.

Now his cabinet is collapsing. This is unheard of to happen this quickly.

Resignation/Impeachment/Death sweepstakes for Trump and his administration?

September 9th, 2018

[Joey Russ 7,149]

December 25, 2017. So I could have a very happy Christmas.  

[RadGuy 1,605]

I actually started an impeachment sweepstakes for him at my school.

 

Going for the same date: April 21, 2018.

[charon 4,941]

He'll run for a second term imo ..... Loving the fact that the lassie who is charged with leaking documents to the press is called Reality Winner http://edition.cnn.com/2017/06/06/politics/reality-winner-twitter-account/index.

[Zsa Zsa's leg 764]

17 minutes ago, charon said:

He'll run for a second term imo ..... Loving the fact that the lassie who is charged with leaking documents to the press is called Reality Winner http://edition.cnn.com/2017/06/06/politics/reality-winner-twitter-account/index.

He'll run but he won't win.

[msc 18,062]

He'll win, bigly.

[the_engineer 1,413]

red

 

 

 

Unemployment rate at its lowest since may 2001 he is delivering on those jobs and if people are earning money, honestly alot of the other stuff will be forgotten . Look at the campaign he won on what he promised on the economy and immigration. Trump knows deliver on those two things and he will get elected again in 2020.

 

Dow Jones is also at record highs which keeps the businesses and money men happy .

 

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business/markets/us/djse_indu

 

http://www.politico.com/story/2017/05/05/economy-created-211-000-jobs-in-april-238028

 

Trump is delivering on the economy especially in swing states and I think in 2020 he will win all the states he won plus new Hampshire. Trump at 310 that's my early prediction . That's if he gets to 2020. The reason the media and dems are working overtime trying hard for that not to happen is they know he will win again and comfortably.

 

[Spade_Cooley 9,211]

[maryportfuncity 10,276]

57 minutes ago, the_engineer said:

red

 

 

 

Unemployment rate at its lowest since may 2001 he is delivering on those jobs and if people are earning money, honestly alot of the other stuff will be forgotten . Look at the campaign he won on what he promised on the economy and immigration. Trump knows deliver on those two things and he will get elected again in 2020.

 

Dow Jones is also at record highs which keeps the businesses and money men happy .

 

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business/markets/us/djse_indu

 

http://www.politico.com/story/2017/05/05/economy-created-211-000-jobs-in-april-238028

 

Trump is delivering on the economy especially in swing states and I think in 2020 he will win all the states he won plus new Hampshire. Trump at 310 that's my early prediction . That's if he gets to 2020. The reason the media and dems are working overtime trying hard for that not to happen is they know he will win again and comfortably.

 

 

How many quality sustainable jobs is he creating so quickly?

 

America also has a precariat

[Joey Russ 7,149]

I honestly don't understand why people think he will be reelected in 2020. The vast majority of his statements he's saying are false, and nearly all the liberals hate him. They will come out and vote against him, in stronger force than last time. Plus, most of the post 2000 births that are finally able to vote (including myself) will be voting against him, so he will be having 4 years max. 

[Zsa Zsa's leg 764]

5 hours ago, the_engineer said:

red

 

 

 

Unemployment rate at its lowest since may 2001 he is delivering on those jobs and if people are earning money, honestly alot of the other stuff will be forgotten . Look at the campaign he won on what he promised on the economy and immigration. Trump knows deliver on those two things and he will get elected again in 2020.

 

Dow Jones is also at record highs which keeps the businesses and money men happy .

 

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business/markets/us/djse_indu

 

http://www.politico.com/story/2017/05/05/economy-created-211-000-jobs-in-april-238028

 

Trump is delivering on the economy especially in swing states and I think in 2020 he will win all the states he won plus new Hampshire. Trump at 310 that's my early prediction . That's if he gets to 2020. The reason the media and dems are working overtime trying hard for that not to happen is they know he will win again and comfortably.

 

But let's remember, those statistics are after 8 years of Obama and less than 5 months of Trump. They won't stay this way in a few months anyways after leaving the Paris deal.

[charon 4,941]

Joey, the vast majority of any politicians statements are false, fuck, outright lies would be a better, more accurate phrase. And he'll be fine policy wise as the imperialists idea of a liberal is what the Rest of the World consider a

[the_engineer 1,413]

1 hour ago, Joey Russ said:

I honestly don't understand why people think he will be reelected in 2020. The vast majority of his statements he's saying are false, and nearly all the liberals hate him. They will come out and vote against him, in stronger force than last time. Plus, most of the post 2000 births that are finally able to vote (including myself) will be voting against him, so he will be having 4 years max. 

 

Just because someone is born after 2000 doesn't mean they're anti trump or won't vote for him. In fact there is evidence mounting up to the opposite. The new generation is rebelling against the previous liberal one. That's why you rarely get 3 terms in a row for one party in USA. The whole sjw liberalism is going to be pushed right back both demographically and ideologically.

 

Liberals for the most part just aren't interested in having kids or a large family.Me and my wife are conservative we want 4 or 5 kids and already on our way but 4 liberal couples we know or work with some want none others want 1 or 2 max and only one couple has one child.  Liberalism also just isn't cool nowadays I hear the young'uns talking about pepe and god emperor trump etc you dont hear them talking about mirco aggressions or checking their privilege.

 

We saw the start of this with trumps election . Big rural conservative families coming out and voting for trump . It won him Pennsylvania ,Florida,Ohio etc and nearly won him Virginia and new Hampshire. Also let's not forget 30% of Latinos voted trump. Be interesting I love election nights there's one in the UK I'm staying up for tomorrow.

 

http://www.cnsnews.com/commentary/eric-metaxas/next-generation-americans-gen-z-may-be-most-conservative-wwii

 

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/education/2017/02/17/student-lefts-culture-intolereance-creating-new-generation-ofconservatives/

 

http://anepigone.blogspot.co.uk/2015/12/among-whites-conservative-liberal.html?m=1

 

BTW In the 90s it was right wingers and Christians that were very uncool saying how video games made you violent and Marilyn Mansons music was of the devil etc remember that? Now its the left wing saying video games are all about white male heroism or they make you sexist by abusing female avators etc or a certain singer says something out of turn and they have to come on twitter in that ' I didn't understand the sensitivities of dressing as a native American' or having my hair in dreads etc. A conservative would just tell them to fuck off . In 20 years we will be laughing at the liberals and the SJWs.

 

 

 

[Joey Russ 7,149]

19 minutes ago, charon said:

Joey, the vast majority of any politicians statements are false, fuck, outright lies would be a better, more accurate phrase. And he'll be fine policy wise as the imperialists idea of a liberal is what the Rest of the World consider a

I try to keep a very open mind for any politician. I can tell you the things that Obama did right, but I can also tell what areas he fucked up on. The same goes for both Bushes, Clinton, Reagan, Carter, Ford. Hell, even Nixon did a few things right even though he was one of the most crooked presidents ever. You can also look at critically acclaimed presidents, such as Kennedy and both Roosevelts, and despite the things they did right, there were also things that they screwed up on (especially Kennedy in his first 100 days). Here's what I'm saying: I know all politicians lie about certain aspects of their plan, but they do always have a bit of the truth in their campaign as well. They do things that they promise, but then there are certain parts of their promise that they don't uphold, for various reasons (whether its the fact they don't really care about their promise or pressure from other parts of the government). The thing about Trump, though, is that every single thing that he's done has been harmful to his country. He is definitely one of the worst in American history.

[Joey Russ 7,149]

Just now, the_engineer said:

 

Just because someone is born after 2000 doesn't mean they're anti trump in fact there is evidence mounting up to the opposite. The new generation is rebelling against the previous liberal one. That's why you rarely get 3 terms in a row for one party in USA. The whole sjw liberalism is going to be pushed right back both demographically and ideologically.

 

Liberals for the most part just aren't interested in having kids or a large family.Me and my wife are conservative we want 4 or 5 kids and already on our way but 4 liberal couples we know or work with some want none others want 1 or 2 max and only one couple has one child.  Liberalism also just isn't cool nowadays I hear the young'uns talking about pepe and god emperor trump etc you dont hear them talking about mirco aggressions or checking their privilege.

 

We saw the start of this with trumps election . Big rural conservative families coming out and voting for trump . It won him Pennsylvania ,Florida,Ohio etc and nearly won him Virginia and new Hampshire. Also let's not forget 30% of Latinos voted trump. Be interesting I love election nights there's one in the UK I'm staying up for tomorrow.

 

http://www.cnsnews.com/commentary/eric-metaxas/next-generation-americans-gen-z-may-be-most-conservative-wwii

 

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/education/2017/02/17/student-lefts-culture-intolereance-creating-new-generation-ofconservatives/

 

http://anepigone.blogspot.co.uk/2015/12/among-whites-conservative-liberal.html?m=1

 

BTW In the 90s it was right wingers and Christians that were very uncool saying how video games made you violent and Marilyn Mansons music was of the devil etc remember that? Now its the left wing saying video games are all about white male heroism or they make you sexist by abusing female avators etc or a certain singer says something out of turn and they have to come on twitter in that ' I didn't understand the sensitivities of dressing as a native American' or having my hair in dreads etc. A conservative would just tell them to fuck off . In 20 years we will be laughing at the liberals and the SJWs.

 

 

 

Well, the thing about last election is that Clinton was unpopular (both candidates were actually), and it just so happened that Trump was lucky enough to win. Many of the liberals either didn't vote or voted for the independence candidate, which was one of the reasons why Clinton lost. You talk about lots of Latinos voted for Trump, but that honestly makes sense, as they have escaped communist, very liberal, countries (which isn't really doing that well, hence why certain conservative policies are beneficial). The liberals will be back, more of them will be voting next time, and it's very unlikely to be a conservative win (it's not impossible though, the liberals could once again nominate another unpopular candidate and cost them the election again). 

[LilyForrester 81]

7 hours ago, the_engineer said:

red

 

 

 

Unemployment rate at its lowest since may 2001 he is delivering on those jobs and if people are earning money, honestly alot of the other stuff will be forgotten . Look at the campaign he won on what he promised on the economy and immigration. Trump knows deliver on those two things and he will get elected again in 2020.

 

Dow Jones is also at record highs which keeps the businesses and money men happy .

 

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business/markets/us/djse_indu

 

http://www.politico.com/story/2017/05/05/economy-created-211-000-jobs-in-april-238028

 

Trump is delivering on the economy especially in swing states and I think in 2020 he will win all the states he won plus new Hampshire. Trump at 310 that's my early prediction . That's if he gets to 2020. The reason the media and dems are working overtime trying hard for that not to happen is they know he will win again and comfortably.

 

This is my logic as well. If the economy is doing well in 2020 and factory jobs in the rust belt have come back I can see him winning all his 2016 states, adding New Hampshire and Minnesota but maybe losing Florida or North Carolina. Remember, Bill Clinton was super unpopular for his first two terms but when the Republicans won the house and senate in 1994, he moderated and became more popular and easily won re-election. At the end of his 1996 campaign, Bob Dole knew he would lose as he was told early on 'If the economy is doing well, you won't beat Clinton'.

 

I see a similar situation happening with Trump. People may personally dislike him but if they are better off after his 4 years and have more money overall, they'll vote with their economic interests.

[charon 4,941]

Joey.... As yet he has not led you into a War.....marks him as the Best President you've ever had. Ever. And economy on the up, unemployment on the slide, and getting out of that shitty Paris Agreement means those whose noses are out of joint will hate him even more.... What was the number of Mexican companies that bid to build the Wall? 37 out of @200 maybe? Even other countries appreciate he ain't the usual quietly corrupt Yank. An obviously corrupt one is so much of a change it's refreshing.

[Lord Fellatio Nelson 6,181]

4 minutes ago, charon said:

Joey.... As yet he has not led you into a War.....marks him as the Best President you've ever had. Ever. And economy on the up, unemployment on the slide, and getting out of that shitty Paris Agreement means those whose noses are out of joint will hate him even more.... What was the number of Mexican companies that bid to build the Wall? 37 out of @200 maybe? Even other countries appreciate he ain't the usual quietly corrupt Yank. An obviously corrupt one is so much of a change it's refreshing.

Another iron fist in a velvet glove from Charon there.....

[Zsa Zsa's leg 764]

44 minutes ago, the_engineer said:

 

Just because someone is born after 2000 doesn't mean they're anti trump or won't vote for him. In fact there is evidence mounting up to the opposite. The new generation is rebelling against the previous liberal one. That's why you rarely get 3 terms in a row for one party in USA. The whole sjw liberalism is going to be pushed right back both demographically and ideologically.

 

Liberals for the most part just aren't interested in having kids or a large family.Me and my wife are conservative we want 4 or 5 kids and already on our way but 4 liberal couples we know or work with some want none others want 1 or 2 max and only one couple has one child.  Liberalism also just isn't cool nowadays I hear the young'uns talking about pepe and god emperor trump etc you dont hear them talking about mirco aggressions or checking their privilege.

 

We saw the start of this with trumps election . Big rural conservative families coming out and voting for trump . It won him Pennsylvania ,Florida,Ohio etc and nearly won him Virginia and new Hampshire. Also let's not forget 30% of Latinos voted trump. Be interesting I love election nights there's one in the UK I'm staying up for tomorrow.

 

http://www.cnsnews.com/commentary/eric-metaxas/next-generation-americans-gen-z-may-be-most-conservative-wwii

 

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/education/2017/02/17/student-lefts-culture-intolereance-creating-new-generation-ofconservatives/

 

http://anepigone.blogspot.co.uk/2015/12/among-whites-conservative-liberal.html?m=1

 

BTW In the 90s it was right wingers and Christians that were very uncool saying how video games made you violent and Marilyn Mansons music was of the devil etc remember that? Now its the left wing saying video games are all about white male heroism or they make you sexist by abusing female avators etc or a certain singer says something out of turn and they have to come on twitter in that ' I didn't understand the sensitivities of dressing as a native American' or having my hair in dreads etc. A conservative would just tell them to fuck off . In 20 years we will be laughing at the liberals and the SJWs.

 

 

 

Let's not forget that 17 United States agencies confirmed that Russia hacked the election.

https://www.google.com/amp/amp.usatoday.com/story/92514592/

We can't predict anything based off of 2016 until we know that the "results" are valid.

[Lord Fellatio Nelson 6,181]

6 minutes ago, Zsa Zsa's leg said:

Let's not forget that 17 United States agencies confirmed that Russia hacked the election.

https://www.google.com/amp/amp.usatoday.com/story/92514592/

We can't predict anything based off of 2016 until we know that the "results" are valid.

Well unless they actually hacked the voting count then the vote was the fucking vote.

[LilyForrester 81]

12 minutes ago, Zsa Zsa's leg said:

Let's not forget that 17 United States agencies confirmed that Russia hacked the election.

https://www.google.com/amp/amp.usatoday.com/story/92514592/

We can't predict anything based off of 2016 until we know that the "results" are valid.

That's a horribly loose term. 'Hacking the election' implies they broke into voting machines and changed votes, which all the intelligence agencies all said didn't happen, even the Obama appointees (Rogers, Clapper, Brennan). The most serious charge they are levelling is that they hacked the DNC and maybe Podesta's Emails and released (true) emails that made voters question Hillary's electability. Remember, nothing in the Wikileaks emails are fake and they are trying to discredit them by tying them to Russia so people won't look at them.

 

And I doubt Russia did anything in all honesty. This feels like an excuse for losing the most easily won election in history. The 'intelligence' agencies also reported Saddam Hussein had WMD's and that misinformation gave us the Iraq War.

 

Julian Assange and Wikileaks deny Russia being the source as well and they have a 100% track record when it comes to leaks and truthfulness, far better then the CIA, NSA and FBI. I think the source was most likely a disgruntled Bernie supporter who discovering the rigging against him and leaked in protest. Podesta even mentions that in one of his emails, saying how he might 'make an example' of a suspected leaker.

[the_engineer 1,413]

18 minutes ago, Zsa Zsa's leg said:

Let's not forget that 17 United States agencies confirmed that Russia hacked the election.

https://www.google.com/amp/amp.usatoday.com/story/92514592/

We can't predict anything based off of 2016 until we know that the "results" are valid.

 

I don't buy this Russia hacked the election nonsense,I highly doubt the powers that be would allow voting machines to be used in their election that can be hacked. Truthfully what it is , is a 'political out' in case trump gets too out of bounds or power grabs.They can't assassinate Trump (like Kennedy) it would cause civil war He has probably been warned don't try anything radical or reduce our power ,otherwise we'll impeach you, arrest you and throw you and your family in jail for rigging election. It's their hold over trump.

[Joey Russ 7,149]

All I'm going to say is that Putin is a dangerous man, and while the elections may not of been hacked, there was certainly some influence from the Russians that hurt Clinton's chances...

[Zsa Zsa's leg 764]

20 minutes ago, LilyForrester said:

That's a horribly loose term. 'Hacking the election' implies they broke into voting machines and changed votes, which all the intelligence agencies all said didn't happen, even the Obama appointees (Rogers, Clapper, Brennan). The most serious charge they are levelling is that they hacked the DNC and maybe Podesta's Emails and released (true) emails that made voters question Hillary's electability. Remember, nothing in the Wikileaks emails are fake and they are trying to discredit them by tying them to Russia so people won't look at them.

 

And I doubt Russia did anything in all honesty. This feels like an excuse for losing the most easily won election in history. The 'intelligence' agencies also reported Saddam Hussein had WMD's and that misinformation gave us the Iraq War.

 

Julian Assange and Wikileaks deny Russia being the source as well and they have a 100% track record when it comes to leaks and truthfulness, far better then the CIA, NSA and FBI. I think the source was most likely a disgruntled Bernie supporter who discovering the rigging against him and leaked in protest. Podesta even mentions that in one of his emails, saying how he might 'make an example' of a suspected leaker.

Wikileaks is open to the public. Almost everything is false or doesn't amount to anything but a slight amount of controversy. 

We can doubt it all we want, but 17 agencies believe the election was hacked, which virtually never happens. To have that large of a consensus on something that seems so vague to the public, they know what happened and are of course going to hide it to protect national security.