9. Noam Chomsky

[msc 18,477]

8 minutes ago, arghton said:

Says that the US is more totalitarian than 1970s Soviet Union, calls Lavrov the Prime Minister of Russia.  

 

I know he was a marmite figure, I know some thought him a zany comedy figure who said controversial things for attention, once upset Andrew Sachs,  and who famously got involved in elections he didn't understand, but man, bit disapppointed Chomsky would hurt this reputation by teaming up with Russell Brand here...

 

[gcreptile 10,974]

I do expect my public intellectuals to recognize when finally, for once, the USA aren't the evil party in an argument, and that they are a little more nuanced. To be fair though, Chomsky is very old and might not have the mental flexibility anymore. But it does make you wonder if he ever had a nuanced view or whether he's just anti-american on principle or because it's his brand. That I outgrew roughly 15 years ago.

[Charles De Gaulle 484]

2 hours ago, arghton said:

Says that the US is more totalitarian than 1970s Soviet Union, calls Lavrov the Prime Minister of Russia.  

Wouldn't be surprised if he doesn't see out the year. Mentally he is 100% there but he looks and sounds so stiff and frail. 

[Sean 6,329]

10 hours ago, Charles De Gaulle said:

Wouldn't be surprised if he doesn't see out the year. Mentally he is 100% there but he looks and sounds so stiff and frail. 

Calling Lavrov the Prime Minister suggests otherwise.Would have been unthinkable that Chomsky  a man of such intellect and known for his incredible recall would make a mistake without immediately realising even a couple of years ago.

[Sean 6,329]

10 hours ago, gcreptile said:

I do expect my public intellectuals to recognize when finally, for once, the USA aren't the evil party in an argument, and that they are a little more nuanced. To be fair though, Chomsky is very old and might not have the mental flexibility anymore. But it does make you wonder if he ever had a nuanced view or whether he's just anti-american on principle or because it's his brand. That I outgrew roughly 15 years ago.

Never shared many beliefs with him politically .I remember some years ago him saying that the Republican Party was the most dangerous organisation in human history which is just  ridiculous  and mind numbing as are his comments about the US living in a more totalitarian culture than Soviet Russia.

[Sean 6,329]

[JR976evil 906]

On 24/07/2022 at 14:04, arghton said:

Says that the US is more totalitarian than 1970s Soviet Union, calls Lavrov the Prime Minister of Russia.  

Pretty much the default socialist position, US is the most evil empire in the universe 

[The Daredevil 1,189]

Chomsky but no James Watson on the DL this year? Unbelievable!

 

Nonetheless, attached is a video of a chipper 93-year-old Chomsky (from 16:50) and 91-year-old Daniel Ellsberg reflecting upon the late Mikhail Gorbachev, Russia etc. 

 

Judging by this video, Chomsky looks like a safe drop for 2023, along with the usual healthy suspects: Attenborough, Van Dyke, Brooks, Lynn etc.

 

[johnykmanus 0]

Chomsky's propositions of alphabet and language are frequently appertained to as “ generative, ” “ transformational, ” or “ transformational- generative. ” In a fine sense, “ generative ” simply means “ formally unequivocal. ” In the case of language, still, the meaning of the term generally also includes the notion of “ productivity ”
 

[Great Uncle Bulgaria 1,284]

On 21/09/2022 at 12:08, The Daredevil said:

Judging by this video, Chomsky looks like a safe drop for 2023, along with the usual healthy suspects: Attenborough, Van Dyke, Brooks, Lynn etc.

This comment dated quickly....

[The Daredevil 1,189]

Mentally sharp and looking good for 94 in his latest video.

 

 

If I was the Committee I’d drop him next year.

 

[Ulitzer95 12,642]

5 hours ago, The Daredevil said:

Mentally sharp and looking good for 94 in his latest video.

 

 

If I was the Committee I’d drop him next year.

 

Why?

 

He’s just as frail as Greenspan IMO, and the two make just as many appearances. Yet you’re not calling on him to be dropped? 

[The Daredevil 1,189]

8 minutes ago, Ulitzer95 said:

Why?

 

He’s just as frail as Greenspan IMO, and the two make just as many appearances. Yet you’re not calling on him to be dropped? 

Well, Greenspan might be a worthy drop too, though seen less of him than Chomsky recently, so it is harder to say with him.

 

But yes, Chomsky and Greenspan will both likely make 2024 and would be understandable drops. Any 94 or 96 year old male is going to look frail to at least some degree.

[Charles De Gaulle 484]

9 minutes ago, Ulitzer95 said:

Why?

 

He’s just as frail as Greenspan IMO, and the two make just as many appearances. Yet you’re not calling on him to be dropped? 

Honestly I'd love to Greenspan to be dropped. Greenspan is only taking up space because he is really old and he is an economist *yawn*. They are way more interesting people.

[Sir Creep 7,070]

Why Chomsky isn’t on DL ‘23 can only be chalked up to “the action of delaying or slowing the progress or development of something.”

[Sean 6,329]

20 hours ago, The Daredevil said:

Mentally sharp and looking good for 94 in his latest video.

 

 

If I was the Committee I’d drop him next year.

 

I close friend of mine is a professional contact of Chomsky's . He agrees with my assessment that he is in decline and has even said he thinks he should retire for the sake of his legacy as is no longer at his best at all.He has also told me that he is responding less to correspondence and when he does there is an uncharacteristic lack of  intellectual engagement and criticality than you would have expected 3 years ago.

[The Daredevil 1,189]

Voices his opinion on the attempted coup in Brazil. I see a slight deterioration from a year ago, but I’d say he has 1-2 years left.

[Lafaucheuse 4,051]

I always thought he was a risky drop. Even if he’s active, he’s way more frail than other active nonagenarians on the list (DVD, Greenspan or Brooks to quote only a few) 

[The Daredevil 1,189]

Latest Interview

 

[gcreptile 10,974]

Youtube recommended me this interview:

 

The beginning is very good, a good interviewer. He also asks some introductory questions that might interest us. It looks like he has still some time, maybe a couple of years, left.

 

Also, on the topic of ChatGPT, unfortunately it does not want to predict deaths. I tried.

[The Daredevil 1,189]

Recent video

 

 

[Sly Ronnie 885]

On 18/02/2023 at 08:21, gcreptile said:

Youtube recommended me this interview:

 

The beginning is very good, a good interviewer. He also asks some introductory questions that might interest us. It looks like he has still some time, maybe a couple of years, left.

 

Also, on the topic of ChatGPT, unfortunately it does not want to predict deaths. I tried.

 

So it has morals? Surely there's a way round it to cough up some predictions.

[Zsa Zsa's leg 884]

Connections to Epstein have surfaced

[DaDeathGuy 202]

5 hours ago, Zsa Zsa's leg said:

Connections to Epstein have surfaced

Kyle Kulinski currently on life support after hearing this.

[Ulitzer95 12,642]