Drunk? Bored?? Psychopath???

[CarolAnn 926]

 

Well that would make sense, but even with it being 5-4 in favour of judges appointed by Republican Presidents. It was 6-3 in favour of Obama for the Affordable Health Care act, The only ones opposing were Scalia, Thomas, and Alito.

 

And Anthony Kennedy favouring the liberal side of passing same-sex marriage, despite Kennedy being nominated and appointed by George W. Bush.

Scalia, Thomas, Alito and Roberts being those opposing.

 

So with Kennedy being one that's more liberal, even though on paper it's 4-4 in reality it is 5-3 in favour of Obama.

US Supreme Court Justices are an fascinating bunch. As soon as you think you are 100% sure you know them, you don't. Lifetime appointments to direct tge ship of state. A fairly broad Constitutional directive. Perfect job.

[Phantom 2,533]

 

 

Well that would make sense, but even with it being 5-4 in favour of judges appointed by Republican Presidents. It was 6-3 in favour of Obama for the Affordable Health Care act, The only ones opposing were Scalia, Thomas, and Alito.

 

And Anthony Kennedy favouring the liberal side of passing same-sex marriage, despite Kennedy being nominated and appointed by George W. Bush.

Scalia, Thomas, Alito and Roberts being those opposing.

 

So with Kennedy being one that's more liberal, even though on paper it's 4-4 in reality it is 5-3 in favour of Obama.

US Supreme Court Justices are an fascinating bunch. As soon as you think you are 100% sure you know them, you don't. Lifetime appointments to direct tge ship of state. A fairly broad Constitutional directive. Perfect job.

 

 

There's some controvery brewing about how Scalia was able to pay for these lavish hunting trips. Certainly he was on a nice salary, but there's speculation that he accepted quite a few bribes to use his influence within the Supreme Court. There's always a chance that others have done that, and could be still doing it.

[CarolAnn 926]

 

 

Well that would make sense, but even with it being 5-4 in favour of judges appointed by Republican Presidents. It was 6-3 in favour of Obama for the Affordable Health Care act, The only ones opposing were Scalia, Thomas, and Alito.

 

And Anthony Kennedy favouring the liberal side of passing same-sex marriage, despite Kennedy being nominated and appointed by George W. Bush.

Scalia, Thomas, Alito and Roberts being those opposing.

 

So with Kennedy being one that's more liberal, even though on paper it's 4-4 in reality it is 5-3 in favour of Obama.

 

US Supreme Court Justices are an fascinating bunch. As soon as you think you are 100% sure you know them, you don't. Lifetime appointments to direct tge ship of state. A fairly broad Constitutional directive. Perfect job.

There's some controvery brewing about how Scalia was able to pay for these lavish hunting trips. Certainly he was on a nice salary, but there's speculation that he accepted quite a few bribes to use his influence within the Supreme Court. There's always a chance that others have done that, and could be still doing it.

Duh.

[Phantom 2,533]

 

 

 

Well that would make sense, but even with it being 5-4 in favour of judges appointed by Republican Presidents. It was 6-3 in favour of Obama for the Affordable Health Care act, The only ones opposing were Scalia, Thomas, and Alito.

 

And Anthony Kennedy favouring the liberal side of passing same-sex marriage, despite Kennedy being nominated and appointed by George W. Bush.

Scalia, Thomas, Alito and Roberts being those opposing.

 

So with Kennedy being one that's more liberal, even though on paper it's 4-4 in reality it is 5-3 in favour of Obama.

US Supreme Court Justices are an fascinating bunch. As soon as you think you are 100% sure you know them, you don't. Lifetime appointments to direct tge ship of state. A fairly broad Constitutional directive. Perfect job.

There's some controvery brewing about how Scalia was able to pay for these lavish hunting trips. Certainly he was on a nice salary, but there's speculation that he accepted quite a few bribes to use his influence within the Supreme Court. There's always a chance that others have done that, and could be still doing it.

Duh.

 

 

What do you mean "Duh"? I'm not disputing what you said. I'm just commenting on what is possibly coming to light at the moment. Scalia allegedly was infuential in Poindexter winning a case regarding age discrimination.

[CarolAnn 926]

I mean "duh" that anyone in the US government, including a federal judge, would ever, ever, ever sell their soul. Couldn't happen nuh uh.

 

Basically, I was being a cynically sarcastic bitch.

[Scraggy Taters 290]

I mean "duh" that anyone in the US government, including a federal judge, would ever, ever, ever sell their soul. Couldn't happen nuh uh.

 

Basically, I was being a cynically sarcastic bitch.

I presume by the regular use of the syllable 'uh'.. that you're American. Huh uh yuh ?

[Handrejka 1,904]

Guess who's drunk? I mean raelly really drunk?

[charon 4,943]

Hmmmm....

[Paul Bearer 6,102]

Guess who's drunk? I mean raelly really drunk?

Me, last night.

[Handrejka 1,904]

Guess who's hung over.

[Lard Bazaar 3,799]

Guess who's drunk? I mean raelly really drunk?

Me, tonight.

[Lard Bazaar 3,799]

Guess who's hung over.

Me, tomorrow.

[CarolAnn 926]

 

I mean "duh" that anyone in the US government, including a federal judge, would ever, ever, ever sell their soul. Couldn't happen nuh uh.

Basically, I was being a cynically sarcastic bitch.

 

I presume by the regular use of the syllable 'uh'.. that you're American. Huh uh yuh ?

Texan.

[Scraggy Taters 290]

 

 

I mean "duh" that anyone in the US government, including a federal judge, would ever, ever, ever sell their soul. Couldn't happen nuh uh.

Basically, I was being a cynically sarcastic bitch.

I presume by the regular use of the syllable 'uh'.. that you're American. Huh uh yuh ?

Texan.

 

Howdy doody ! Thought so. Am all hat & no cattle me.

[Sir Creep 7,070]

And the DL winner for posting the most useless pile of bollocks in their ouvre?

football_fan has 2617 posts, and an almost impossible paucity of 2 'likes'.
Also placing a bar of ineptitude and dislike as high as he can, Canadian Paul has over 4100 posts, and only 4 likes, which gives football_fan a fighting chance.
SirC

Edit: of course should one of the aforementioned come here and say 'fuck off Creep' they'll prolly get a couple 'likes' and off the schnide.

[The Mad Hatter 1,092]

And the DL winner for posting the most useless pile of bollocks in their ouvre?

football_fan has 2617 posts, and an almost impossible paucity of 2 'likes'.

Also placing a bar of ineptitude and dislike as high as he can, Canadian Paul has over 4100 posts, and only 4 likes, which gives football_fan a fighting chance.

SirC

 

they were around before likes so they are automatically going to get less likes.

[msc 18,477]

The Like system is fairly new. I know when I check old threads for a bit of data, I sometimes find posts that made me laugh but which were before the like system came into place. Canadian Paul would probably have a million likes these days, as he used to update a massive thread of DDP friendly corpses to be*, and ran the Canadian dead pool. The latter is way before I posted here, but longer time members have spoken fondly of it.

 

*I've since looked up the original Octopus of Odstock/Canadian Paul list - I believe over 60% of a 200-300 name list were dead within 2-3 years.

[Lord Fellatio Nelson 6,218]

And the DL winner for posting the most useless pile of bollocks in their ouvre?

 

football_fan has 2617 posts, and an almost impossible paucity of 2 'likes'.

Also placing a bar of ineptitude and dislike as high as he can, Canadian Paul has over 4100 posts, and only 4 likes, which gives football_fan a fighting chance.

SirC

 

Edit: of course should one of the aforementioned come here and say 'fuck off Creep' they'll prolly get a couple 'likes' and off the schnide.

Well they probably wont but I will.

You are, without a shadow of a doubt, a complete and utter tool.

Fuck off Cunt Creep.

[Toast 16,141]

And the DL winner for posting the most useless pile of bollocks in their ouvre?

 

football_fan has 2617 posts, and an almost impossible paucity of 2 'likes'.

Also placing a bar of ineptitude and dislike as high as he can, Canadian Paul has over 4100 posts, and only 4 likes, which gives football_fan a fighting chance.

SirC

 

Edit: of course should one of the aforementioned come here and say 'fuck off Creep' they'll prolly get a couple 'likes' and off the schnide.

 

I genuinely didn't think you were as stupid as this.

[The Mad Hatter 1,092]

 

And the DL winner for posting the most useless pile of bollocks in their ouvre?

football_fan has 2617 posts, and an almost impossible paucity of 2 'likes'.

Also placing a bar of ineptitude and dislike as high as he can, Canadian Paul has over 4100 posts, and only 4 likes, which gives football_fan a fighting chance.

SirC

Edit: of course should one of the aforementioned come here and say 'fuck off Creep' they'll prolly get a couple 'likes' and off the schnide.

 

I genuinely didn't think you were as stupid as this.

aren't there users with no likes at all. In fact notaguest has zero likes and is banned surely he would have been the worst poster by that logic.

[Phantom 2,533]

 

 

And the DL winner for posting the most useless pile of bollocks in their ouvre?

football_fan has 2617 posts, and an almost impossible paucity of 2 'likes'.

Also placing a bar of ineptitude and dislike as high as he can, Canadian Paul has over 4100 posts, and only 4 likes, which gives football_fan a fighting chance.

SirC

Edit: of course should one of the aforementioned come here and say 'fuck off Creep' they'll prolly get a couple 'likes' and off the schnide.

I genuinely didn't think you were as stupid as this.

aren't there users with no likes at all. In fact notaguest has zero likes and is banned surely he would have been the worst poster by that logic.

 

 

Why is this even an issue? If I remember correctly, years ago (I've only been on here 10 years) not many people would "like" posts.

It's only in the past couple of years that more people have been doing that.

So now days if you don't get that many "likes" then it could just be the policy of the posts you make.

[time 8,611]

 

And the DL winner for posting the most useless pile of bollocks in their ouvre?

 

football_fan has 2617 posts, and an almost impossible paucity of 2 'likes'.

Also placing a bar of ineptitude and dislike as high as he can, Canadian Paul has over 4100 posts, and only 4 likes, which gives football_fan a fighting chance.

SirC

 

Edit: of course should one of the aforementioned come here and say 'fuck off Creep' they'll prolly get a couple 'likes' and off the schnide.

 

I genuinely didn't think you were as stupid as this.

 

I did.

[Phantom 2,533]

I'm tempted to "like" as many of other people's posts except SC's posts. Just for S&Gs

[Lard Bazaar 3,799]

For fuck's sake. When my kid was about 16 she would go on like 'oh my god mum my insta photo got 47 likes'. WHO THE FUCK CARES?

[time 8,611]

For fuck's sake. When my kid was about 16 she would go on like 'oh my god mum my insta photo got 47 likes'. WHO THE FUCK CARES?

Sir Creep cares. Why the fuck he cares is anybody's guess, but given his history (such that it is) is anyone surprised he cares?