maryportfuncity 10,646 Posted December 2, 2014 Lionel Blair won't work with kids anymore because he's afraid of false child abuse allegations. Do we take this statement at face value? I had no idea the old hoofer was still "working." It gives him a break from noncing, obviously. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
maryportfuncity 10,646 Posted December 18, 2014 Hey up, this is going to keep us in banter for a week or two: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-30534235 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Guest Posted December 18, 2014 Lionel Blair won't work with kids anymore because he's afraid of false child abuse allegations. Do we take this statement at face value? i avoid kids as well in case I'm accused of being a pedo.if a kid was dying in the street I'd cross tithe otter side to avoid anyone getting the wrong idea.i think most guys think the same way these days.mind u I never really liked kids anyway... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
the_engineer 1,415 Posted December 18, 2014 Hey up, this is going to keep us in banter for a week or two: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-30534235 Yet still no arrests . This started over 2 years ago ,similar to the Hillsborough so called 'investigation' they are simply kicking it into the long grass . Wouldn't be surprised if a certain man named leon kicked the bucket pretty sharpish . Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DevonDeathTrip 2,358 Posted December 18, 2014 Hey up, this is going to keep us in banter for a week or two: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-30534235 Yet still no arrests . This started over 2 years ago ,similar to the Hillsborough so called 'investigation' they are simply kicking it into the long grass . Wouldn't be surprised if a certain man named leon kicked the bucket pretty sharpish . David Mellor stated a few months ago that Leon Brittan had health issues. Brittan is a decent man, and a dedicated public servant, who always carried out his duties with total integrity. In all my years in politics, I met no one I respected, or liked, more. He has been gravely ill recently, and does not deserve the opprobrium he has received. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
msc 18,439 Posted December 18, 2014 ] Hey up, this is going to keep us in banter for a week or two: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-30534235 Yet still no arrests . This started over 2 years ago ,similar to the Hillsborough so called 'investigation' they are simply kicking it into the long grass . Wouldn't be surprised if a certain man named leon kicked the bucket pretty sharpish . David Mellor stated a few months ago that Leon Brittan had health issues. Brittan is a decent man, and a dedicated public servant, who always carried out his duties with total integrity. In all my years in politics, I met no one I respected, or liked, more. He has been gravely ill recently, and does not deserve the opprobrium he has received. While I wouldn't bet on it, it wouldn't surprise me in the least if a few names from that period...forgot to take their medication one day in the near future, in a manner of speaking. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
maryportfuncity 10,646 Posted December 19, 2014 It wouldn't surprise me if Leon Brittan was asking Santa for incontinence pants this Christmas! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Dr. Zorders 1,271 Posted December 21, 2014 http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/11306575/Five-Westminster-paedophile-rings-probed-by-Scotland-Yard.html Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
maryportfuncity 10,646 Posted December 22, 2014 http://www.telegraph...tland-Yard.html Friend of a friend stuff at a Christmas get together but... apparently The Sun were set to run a story naming one prominent Westminster politician in the context of child abuse in 1984. A name we've already traded on here. Story pulled within hours of the presses rolling. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
the_engineer 1,415 Posted December 22, 2014 http://www.telegraph...tland-Yard.html Friend of a friend stuff at a Christmas get together but... apparently The Sun were set to run a story naming one prominent Westminster politician in the context of child abuse in 1984. A name we've already traded on here. Story pulled within hours of the presses rolling. Look out for MP's or Minsters in the 70s and 80s suddenly dying (not just leon) over christmas /new year .A so called Heart attack that's how they got robin cook,whilst hiking on ministry of defence land . http://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/latest-news/339807/Mystery-death-of-key-MP-witness-in-Diana-s-murder http://www.whale.to/b/cook4.html Still waiting for them to reopen the case into Jill Dando's death btw. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest droosy Posted December 22, 2014 The children from our kindergarten love Jimmy Savile!! The Christmas will be sad without him Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Phantom 2,533 Posted December 22, 2014 The children from our kindergarten love Jimmy Savile!! The Christmas will be sad without him If they're in kindergarten now, they'd only have been 1-2 years old when he died. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
the_engineer 1,415 Posted December 23, 2014 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alan_Williams http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/11232988/Westminster-paedophile-ring-now-where-does-the-investigation-go.html well here is one MP death and he was known as father of the house, MP for 46 years in wales and we all know about the systematic abuse that has come out in north wales surely a MP in that area for 46 years would know some names and be able to expose alot or maybe he was one of them . How many more you think will die between now and when they start to make arrests ? Of course it could just be a coincidence but... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Deathray 2,940 Posted January 2, 2015 http://m.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-30659629 if true some things about this could start making an awful lot of sense 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
thefunkyfaz 51 Posted January 27, 2015 I hadn't heard TV weatherman Fred Talbot had been accused of similar misdemeanours.Then I saw this headline... "Stone Roses' Ian Brown 'shown gay porn by Fred Talbot' " http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-manchester-31003041 My lad's got his first sex ed lesson today - I'd better quiz him on exactly what he's been taught... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Phantom 2,533 Posted February 3, 2015 Fred Talbot's trial has been halted after the took a tumble in the witness stand Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lord Fellatio Nelson 6,218 Posted February 3, 2015 Fred Talbot's trial has been halted after the took a tumble in the witness stand One of the very few times he has gone down and not headed mouth first towards a cock. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
themaninblack 2,112 Posted February 3, 2015 I hadn't heard TV weatherman Fred Talbot had been accused of similar misdemeanours.Then I saw this headline... "Stone Roses' Ian Brown 'shown gay porn by Fred Talbot' " http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-manchester-31003041 My lad's got his first sex ed lesson today - I'd better quiz him on exactly what he's been taught... I am the Resserection? 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Phantom 2,533 Posted February 4, 2015 Fred Talbot's trial resumes. The witness stand box is now marked with a "mind the step" sign. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Phantom 2,533 Posted February 10, 2015 Former classmate of Ian Brown has stated in court that Brown is talking bollocks ok he didn't use those words, he just said that Talbot never showed the class gay pornography, instead it was a film about child birth. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
maryportfuncity 10,646 Posted February 10, 2015 Former classmate of Ian Brown has stated in court that Brown is talking bollocks ok he didn't use those words, he just said that Talbot never showed the class gay pornography, instead it was a film about child birth. So, we need some common sense. I'm assuming a class full of Manc head cases, probs already under the influence of summat they took at break time, and the one thing we might usefully assume about Talbot's movie is that at some point a hand was inserted in a bodily orifice, beyond which the conflicting testimony - sort of - makes sense. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Phantom 2,533 Posted February 10, 2015 Former classmate of Ian Brown has stated in court that Brown is talking bollocks ok he didn't use those words, he just said that Talbot never showed the class gay pornography, instead it was a film about child birth. So, we need some common sense. I'm assuming a class full of Manc head cases, probs already under the influence of summat they took at break time, and the one thing we might usefully assume about Talbot's movie is that at some point a hand was inserted in a bodily orifice, beyond which the conflicting testimony - sort of - makes sense. I think perhaps he needs to be able to differentiate the difference between pornography and a social education documentary about reproduction. I vaguely remember the one we were shown. Naked couple (couldn't see any genitalia. And you could only see the breasts from the side view and her forearm was obscurring any sight of the nipple. And when they showed the part about penetration, it switched to a computer graphic image. I remember the horrified faces of some of the girls in our class when they showed the actual birth scene, yet 75% of those were ones that got pregnant by the time they were 18. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
thefunkyfaz 51 Posted February 10, 2015 Former classmate of Ian Brown has stated in court that Brown is talking bollocks ok he didn't use those words, he just said that Talbot never showed the class gay pornography, instead it was a film about child birth. So, we need some common sense. I'm assuming a class full of Manc head cases, probs already under the influence of summat they took at break time, and the one thing we might usefully assume about Talbot's movie is that at some point a hand was inserted in a bodily orifice, beyond which the conflicting testimony - sort of - makes sense. I think perhaps he needs to be able to differentiate the difference between pornography and a social education documentary about reproduction. I vaguely remember the one we were shown. Naked couple (couldn't see any genitalia. And you could only see the breasts from the side view and her forearm was obscurring any sight of the nipple. And when they showed the part about penetration, it switched to a computer graphic image. I remember the horrified faces of some of the girls in our class when they showed the actual birth scene, yet 75% of those were ones that got pregnant by the time they were 18. We didn't even get a video. Just one Biology lesson with lots of talking and occasional references to the text book. I think the assumption was that we knew it all already, based on the quality of the grafitti around the school... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Magere Hein 1,400 Posted February 11, 2015 We didn't even get a video. Just one Biology lesson with lots of talking and occasional references to the text book. I think the assumption was that we knew it all already, based on the quality of the grafitti around the school... My secondary school was a Roman Catholic one, so sex ed was a touchy subject, after all sex was a sin. But the law demands time for it, so the biology teacher did his best on the technical bits. The task of teaching the personal and erotic sides of things was passed around by the teachers like a hot potato and eventually handed to the one who taught religous stuff. This red-faced young teacher swallowed his embarrasment and did the job quite well. He showed no videos (the biology teacher did) but he did, a bit hush-hush, explain homosexuality and contraception. He answered all awkward questions, as far as any word would come from his equally red-faced pupils. He showed how to use a condom with a candle he'd nicked from the chapel. Brave man. regards, Hein Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Youwanticewiththat 611 Posted February 11, 2015 We didn't even get a video. Just one Biology lesson with lots of talking and occasional references to the text book. I think the assumption was that we knew it all already, based on the quality of the grafitti around the school... My secondary school was a Roman Catholic one, so sex ed was a touchy subject, after all sex was a sin. But the law demands time for it, so the biology teacher did his best on the technical bits. The task of teaching the personal and erotic sides of things was passed around by the teachers like a hot potato and eventually handed to the one who taught religous stuff. This red-faced young teacher swallowed his embarrasment and did the job quite well. He showed no videos (the biology teacher did) but he did, a bit hush-hush, explain homosexuality and contraception. He answered all awkward questions, as far as any word would come from his equally red-faced pupils. He showed how to use a condom with a candle he'd nicked from the chapel. Brave man. regards, Hein Now that's a real talent. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites