Leaderboard
Popular Content
Showing content with the highest reputation on 05/12/20 in Posts
-
2 points
-
2 pointsFired by Trump. Possibly the low point of his career https://www.google.com/amp/amp.washingtontimes.com/news/2020/dec/2/henry-kissinger-9-others-leave-defense-policy-boar/
-
2 pointsWe need some more actors. Gene Hackman, Robert Duvall, Joe Don Baker, Joss Ackland and Colin Jeavons should all be under serious consideration
-
2 pointsAssuming Philip goes within the next 2 years (which isn't in itself a certainty), I think QEII will live for at least another decade BUT we should probably start putting her on the List circa 2025. People need to get this nonsense out of their head about Philip dying then the Queen suddenly going down hill afterwards. For much of the year they're separated, and more so lately given Philip's retirement from public life. She did have a life prior to him and she will have one after him, regardless of length of marriage. Her focus has always been on service to her country, hence why I don't believe she will abdicate. She'd rather make Charles "Prince Regent" before doing that, whereby he fulfils all of her duties but she remains monarch in name. One of my friends used to be a butler for the Royals (no it isn't bloody Paul Burrell) and one thing he always stressed to me was the resilience of Her Majesty. She lost her father at a young age, and in the last two decades has watched as those from both the generation above her (the Queen Mother, Auntie Alice etc) and her own generation (friends, cousins, bridesmaids) have all passed away. She's always felt deep sorrow as such but springs back all the same. She's come to expect Philip's death for a long while now. He's been hospitalised on numerous occasions. I sincerely doubt that when he turned 90 she expected him to be around for another decade. She'll be very grateful that he's still by her side but by now she would have also come to terms with the fact that he likely won't be around for a great deal longer. She'll go on and in mid–2024 she'll become the longest reigning sovereign monarch in world history. And if other users are skeptical about my forecast, they only need to go back to April 2018 in this thread, when I said Philip will reach his centenary. That was 32 months ago. He's only got 6 to go. Most on here bet on him being gone ages ago. Never write the Royals off easily. They don't get a cold then suddenly they're dead. It's degeneration that gets them always, and it takes a lot longer than most because they live very active lives and have access to the best healthcare money can buy.
-
1 pointHello Everyone, as the 2020 season is coming to a close and we are all terribly excited to see who is going to win that close race at the top of the 2020 competition, here is the thread for the next round of this all-encompassing, difficult to manage deadpool. The general rules: Send me 50 main team names by pm or just post them in this thread, if you want, from now on until Dec 31st 2020, 23:59 GMT. You can choose one joker with double points - and you can also submit up to five substitutes in case one of your 50 dies before the end of the submission window. You may also choose new subs before the game starts if they die. Submission form: Just give them in the normal "First name", "Last name" format You don't need to number them before! No need to give birthdays! And only note their claim to fame if there might be confusion, for example: Kamala Harris (wrestler) - Update 2020: Well, this one is dead. Kamala Harris (US senator) - Update 2020: Well, this one is soon president. The scoring is [year of birth] - 1900 = score. So someone born in 2001 will get 101 points in case of death You may submit the following people: living, not having set a precise date of death (by execution, dignitas, or whatever), at least 18 years old on the beginning of January 1st, 2021, and being somewhat notable. "Somewhat notable" means: they should at least be notable for something else aside from being terminally ill. "Something else" being something that has an effect on society. Terminally ill activists are okay if they've done at least something generally beneficial, a campaign, a book, or a winning court case. If they're only in the news because of their tragedy or because they need our sympathy I will not accept them. So no "cancer mums with cancer kids", no "terminally ill fans", no "ordinary person in a coma because of a car crash". This also counts for brothers/sisters/children of notable people - unless they are so notable that every relative is also notable by default, like the House of Windsor, or maybe the Bush family. Unfortunately, it is me who will decide if the person is famous enough. Previous BBC coverage will usually convince me. More details: Notability is getting ever more diffuse nowadays, it is a difficult thing to judge. Some more guidelines: Media personalities and such will be accepted in any case if they have a social media account with more than 100.000 followers. So, as a contrast to last year, Criscilla Anderson is now a valid pick! A person that gets rejected in the DDP will also be rejected here - no exceptions. Family/friends of people, i.e. reality TV appendages like Litsa Menounos: Yes, they will be allowed if they actually play a meaningful part in these shows, as Litsa Menounos did. No, they will not be allowed if they only accidentally get an imdb entry because of an accidental appearance, or because they say a few sentences in a documentary. Also: "Oldest Person of XYZ" will always be allowed - even a completely irrelevant person (in the grand scheme of things) will be accepted if they are the oldest person of their country, or last survivor of World War II, Korean War, etc... Usually those people do not give many points, but maybe 5 pts is better than zero? And they are of a certain "historic relevance", you know President Tyler's grandson, and such. Anyway, I will allow them. Substitution phase: On the 1st of July 2021 GMT you may switch 5 old people still alive for 5 new ones for whom all the above rules also apply. When is a hit a hit: If the person permanently dies in 2021 (GMT!) and their death gets noticed in written form by qualifying media outlets within 2021 or the first seven days of 2022. The QO rules are: Everything accepted by the Derby Dead Pool 2021 plus The New York Times. Your host: I will also submit a team and will do so two posts below by December 15th at latest and hide the names with "XXXXX XXXXX" and reveal them on January 1st. Main reason for not already submitting right now is that I want to avoid the situation of 2019, when I ran out of subs and then filled the gaps with "new" names, especially Edmund Capon, who revealed his illness mid-December. So I hope I will not run out of subs if I submit a little later. As in last year, I will also make use of the substitution window, but only use 2 names. After all, there's always a pretty broad consensus of a couple of names (example 2019: Ivan Milat, Michael Sleggs, Tom Long), so I wouldn't steal anyone's names by picking those who are universally known anyway. Also, I will substitute on the 30th of June, so you can see my two names. I will not read your submission emails until January 1st (I think you can check that) to prevent the impression that I might take a name from your posts for other deadpools. This also means that I might discuss borderline acceptable picks with you on January 1st or 2nd. We will have to talk then. If you're unavailable, I will replace a disqualified name with one of your substitutions. Remember, the disqualification in some cases might come only after the DDP committee has decided, so maybe not before the 2nd week of January. If you post your team right in this thread, you save me some work but also give away names. If you pm me, please make sure that I know what the mail is about in the header "Death By Numbers", "Team submission" or something like that. If you have other questions, you can also ask in this thread!
-
1 pointOk - personally I think Jeroen Krabbe was the main villain in that film but I see I have made a claim easily disputable based on the perception of the word "main"! I withdraw it immediately.
-
1 pointAckland's old no doubt with all the associated health issues but he doesn''t look too bad here from earlier in the year... https://www.devonlive.com/news/devon-news/legendary-devon-actor-joss-ackland-4061973 Yaphet Kotto may be the oldest surviving main Bond villain but does he actually have any known health issues? At 81 he'd be a bit of a punt without any...
-
1 pointI have an idea, but if I told it, it wouldn't be a surprise anymore.
-
1 pointBusinessman Christos Tsiolias, co-founder and vice president of the Oxford clothing company, died aged 62 after being infected by the novel coronavirus. The announcement was made by the Hellenic Clothing Industry Association on Thursday. SC
-
1 pointI would be surprised if anyone was thick enough to take the swearing thing seriously when hidden in a wall of emoji-pasta, but I guess you can claim anything is hidden behind a wall of 'secondary sarcasm'. My clunkers are great I don't think I need to actually address very many of the comments here about me, though it's very tempting to respond to some of the bait. I would like to make an apology about only making 195 posts in my time here, I assure you that I will make an effort to immerse myself in your society! I noticed an admin opted me out which goes against "I think it's a feature that should be taken away completely rather than each profile being able to opt out." It's like tax loop-holes, people are unlikely to pay a larger amount of tax just for charitable reasons, if everyone else is in I'm still gonna have it enabled.
-
1 pointJust watched Vice and W back to back, what an enigmatic figure this guy was. Definitey one of the most influential people in modern history.
-
1 pointHe’s got a point though. This site is often teeming with children, and even when it’s not, there’s no need for such obscene language all the time. So I twatting well agree with every fucking single bastard cunting word this prick shat out. You’re the fucking dogs bollocks John Key, and don’t fucking let any other arsehole tell you different.
-
1 pointI was neutral on this until just now when I clicked on his reply to Lardy. (I didn't bother on first reading.) WTF? Or, shall I say, what the fuck? The swearing is one of the best things about this place. And what's that about emojis not being allowed here? What the fuck is that all about?
-
1 pointOK thanks. I'll try to put up an avatar, something appropriate for the time of year maybe... edit- OK, I've done it. What do you think? Just thought I'd make it a bit christmassy. I'll put another one up in the new year of course.
-
1 pointSince people keep asking, here is a list of 2020 picks from A to F that would be disallowed under the 2021 rules: Doug Allen Julie Allen Dolores Aviero Lynda Bailey Barbara Bamford Leanne Barrett Jennifer Bell Simona Birdsell Anne Brokenbaw M|area Burke Roberta Burton Karl Butler Mckennah Carter Hayley Casey Bethan Close Ria Collins Vicki Eastaugh Bruce Evans Anthony Faituna Pete Felton Lisa Fry (Then I got depressed, but you should get the general picture by now...) Would need a better look at their credentials or lack of: Criscilla Anderson
-
1 pointI have actually clicked on his profile to find that he has a whole 195 posts under his belt over three sodding years. He then expresses an opinion that a feature be removed! People truly take the piss.
-
1 point
-
1 pointMy own team: 1. XXX XXXXXX (joker) 2. XXX XXXXXX (replacement joker) 3. XXX XXXXXX 4. XXX XXXXXX 5. XXX XXXXXX (okay, that's it) 6. XXXXX XXXXXX 7. XXX XXXXXXXX 8. XXX XXXXX 9. XXXXX XXXXXXX 10. XXX XXXXXXXXX 11. XXXXX XXXXXXXX 12. XXXX XXXXXX 13. XXXX XXXXXXX 14. XXXXXX XXXXXXXX 15. XXXX XXXXXXX 16. XXXX XXXXXXXX 17. XXXX XXXXXXXX 18. XXXXX XXXXX 19. XXXX XXXX 20. XXXX XXXXXXX 21. XXXXXXX XXXXXX XX 22. XXXXXX XXXXX 23. XXXXXX XX 24. XXXX XXXXXX 25. XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX 26. XXXXXX XXXXX 27. XXXXXXX XXXXXXXX 28. XXXXXX XXXXX 29. XXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX 30. XXXXXXX XXXXXX 31. XXXXX XXXXXXX 32. XXXXX XXXX 33. XXXXXX XXXXXXXX 34. XXXX XXX XXXXX XXXXXXX 35. XXXXXXX XXXXXX 36. XXXX XXXXXX 37. XXX XXXXXXX 38. XXXX XXXXXXXX 39. XXXX XXXX 40. XXXXX XXXX 41. XXXXXX XXXXXXX 42. XX XXXXXXXX 43. XXXXX XXXXXXX 44. XXXXX XXXX 45. XXXXXXX XXXXX 46. XXXX XXXXXX 47. XXXX XXXXXX 48. XXXXX XXXXXXXX 49. XXX XXXXX 50. XXXXX XXXXXX Subs: XXXX-XXXXX XXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXX XXX XXX XXXXX XXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXX XXXXXXX Edit: The revelation: 1 Ady Barkan (joker) 26 Alvaro Colom 2 Tom Parker 27 Michael McKevitt 3 Dai Davies 28 Carlos Menem 4 Tim Bilton 29 Constantino Chiwenga 5 Tim Keller 30 Brendon Ormsby 6 Floyd Little 31 Tommy Lasorda 7 Tom Weiskopf 32 Ernie Moss 8 Tom Smith 33 Andrew McDonald 9 Susie Steiner 34 Jake "The Snake" Roberts 10 Ken Wilkinson 35 Mustafa Cengiz 11 David Gulpilil 36 Stan Bowles 12 Leon Spinks 37 Jon Hassell 13 Josu Ternera 38 Bill Turnbull 14 Sunday Burquest 39 Phil Read 15 Gary Burgess 40 Larry King 16 Paul Westphal 41 Dennis Skinner 17 Rush Limbaugh 42 OJ Brigance 18 James Whale 43 Sarah Ezekiel 19 Ezra Nawi 44 David Webb 20 Paul Cosford 45 Bernard Tapie 21 Gregory Scarpa Jr. 46 Suzy Friton 22 Johnny Ruffo 47 Ivan Julian 23 Rodion GA 48 Litsa Menounos 24 Gerd Müller 49 Lee Noble 25 Catherine Wybourne 50 Sarah Hughes
-
1 point
-
1 point
-
1 pointPopular Spelling Mistakes and How to Present Certain Names the DDP Way Basically for a pick to be recognised by the DDP database every name needs entered in a uniform way. So every spelling variation away from this needs amended whether a simple spelling mistake or the fact that there are sometimes many variations of writing the same persons name. Qaboos etc last time was a classic where there were about 20 variations of entry and all needed converted to one name. Now I can't address the new names this year because that is sharing information from people's picks but I think it is reasonable to share the correct DDP way that matches the Database for some very popular historical picks as follows:- Prince Philip - note one L Queen Elizabeth II - not The Queen or Queen Elizabeth or Elizabeth Windsor Pope Emeritus Benedict XVI - this is one of those that has so many variations but this is what they all get changed to I'll add to this list as I start going through entries and remind myself - it's only the popular names that make a difference - each of you taking time to spell basic names correctly though does save me time on each entry. As above to do this for your entries means doing the checks 3 times, but if nobody does I'm doing 400 times. Names not being recognised, checking the databases for the correct spelling, finding the correct spelling, amending probably takes a similar amount of time to the changing of the format so again could be 30 seconds per team on average. Another 4 hours. I think with a little bit of cooperation we could take 10 hours out of the team entry process which would be massive for me. All terribly boring I know but thanks if you have taken the time to read and doing your best to help. Cheers, GUN
-
1 pointJohn Savident who played Fred Elliott in Corrie. 82 now though has always looked about that age, no news about him since 2012. If he is still that obese he could be a good pick.
-
1 pointGerman wikipedia claims that SS Totenkopf Division Nazi Johann Rehbogen, died in November 2019. He was picked here and there last year, including in the DDP 2019 and 2020, after he was deemed unfit for trial.
-
1 pointhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Life_Ahead Her new movie is on Netflix,and she might end up being nominated for Best Actress at the 2021 Oscars
-
1 point
-
Newsletter
Important Information
Your use of this forum is subject to our Terms of Use